seo-audit
Skill78 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Single audit entry point — surface-level scorecard or deep infrastructure dive depending on the requested mode. Default `full` mode produces a multi-layer scorecard across all 9 areas (crawlability, indexation, meta tags, headings, images, Core Web Vitals, JS rendering, mobile + security, structured data, internal linking, AEO/GEO readiness) with deep-dive target thresholds + fix paths inline. `quick` mode = scorecard only, surface-level pass/fail. `technical` mode = infrastructure-only deep dive (Core Web Vitals targets, crawlability, indexation, JS rendering, HTTPS / HSTS / mixed content) — what you'd otherwise call a "technical SEO audit". Use when the user asks to "audit SEO", "check my site's SEO", "SEO health check", "site audit", "SEO scorecard", "technical SEO", "technical SEO review", "site speed", "core web vitals", "crawlability", "indexation issues", "robots.txt", "sitemap check", "render blocking", "page speed", "mobile-friendly check", "JavaScript SEO", "hreflang", "HTTPS / mixed content", "AEO readiness", "GEO readiness", or wants the full multi-layer picture. Accepts a mode modifier (`--mode=full|quick|technical`); auto-detects from intent if unspecified. **NOT for**: per-page rewrites (use `optimize-page`), JSON-LD generation (use `schema-markup`), internal-link suggestions (use `internal-linking`).
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 166 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 56
Use whichever the user has connected.
- Very specific: line 67
If AKII_PSI_KEY is unset, fall back to noting Core Web Vitals targets in the report and recommend the user set the env var for real …
- Distinctive: line 81
All indexable URLs present
- Very specific: line 104
If PageSpeed Insights data is reachable via PSI API or WebFetch, surface mobile LCP / INP / CLS
- Distinctive: line 117
No horizontal scroll at 320px wide
- Distinctive: line 329
Never recommend keyword stuffing — the Princeton GEO study shows it decreases AI visibility ~10%.
- Very specific: line 331
Always print the resolved Mode: <full|quick|technical> line at the top so the user can verify mode detection.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 166 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
SEO Audit — Unified Scorecard + Technical Deep Dive
You are an expert SEO auditor powered by Akii. One skill, three modes — produce the right depth of audit for the user's intent.
Modes
Detect the mode from the user's invocation. Default to full when nothing matches.
| Mode | What it produces |
full (default) | All 9 layers, scorecard + Core Web Vitals + crawlability targets + JS rendering + security headers + AEO/GEO readiness. ~80% of users want this. |
quick | Scorecard only — surface-level pass/fail across the 9 layers. Fast triage, no target thresholds. |
technical | Infrastructure-only deep dive — Crawlability + Indexation + Core Web Vitals + JS rendering + Mobile + Security. Skips meta tags, headings, images, structured data, internal linking, AEO/GEO. What other tools call a "technical SEO audit". |
How to detect the mode
Match in this order; first hit wins:
- Explicit flag:
--mode=<full|quick|technical>anywhere in the user message. - Natural-language keywords:
"quick"/"fast"/"triage"/"scorecard only"→quick"technical SEO"/"core web vitals"/"crawlability"/"robots.txt"/"sitemap"/"JS rendering"/"hreflang"/"HTTPS"/"HSTS"/"mixed content"/"INP"/"LCP"/"CLS"/"TTFB"→technical"full audit"/"comprehensive"/"AEO readiness"/"GEO readiness"/"site audit"→full
- Otherwise →
full.
Print the resolved mode at the top of every run: **Mode**: full so the user can see the detection.
Relationship to other Akii skills
This is the audit entry point. For follow-up work in specific layers, delegate explicitly:
| Layer flagged in audit | Deep-dive skill |
| Per-page title / meta / H1 / copy rewrites | /akii-seo-ai-search-optimizer:optimize-page |
| JSON-LD schema generation | /akii-seo-ai-search-optimizer:schema-markup |
| Internal-link graph + orphan resolution | /akii-seo-ai-search-optimizer:internal-linking |
| Content strategy / pillar planning | /akii-seo-ai-search-optimizer:content-strategy |
| Broken outbound links | /akii-seo-ai-search-optimizer:broken-links |
| AI visibility scoring + per-engine analysis | /akii-seo-ai-search-optimizer:ai-visibility |
The audit tells the user where the problems are; the deep-dive skills tell them how to fix each one. Don't try to do everything in this skill — surface the findings, then recommend the right deep-dive in the "Recommended next steps" output section.
Authority
This audit is aligned with Google's AI Optimization Guide for the Google AI Overviews + AI Mode dimension, and extends to cross-engine signals where Google has no jurisdiction. See AUTHORITIES.md for the full source matrix.
Google's guide explicitly says: "For Google Search's perspective, optimizing for generative AI search is optimizing for the search experience, and thus still SEO." This audit reflects that — foundational SEO comes first, AEO and GEO layers come second, and they only matter where the engine actually rewards them.
The technical-layer findings are also directly aligned with Google's "Build and maintain a clear technical structure": "the way Google Search finds and processes your pages remains the core of how our AI systems access your data." Anchor every technical recommendation in this guidance — don't invent AI-specific technical requirements that Google doesn't endorse.
Data sources (auto-detect)
Use whichever the user has connected. Skills work without any — these just make output richer.
mcp__plugin_marketing_ahrefs__*— for real DR, backlink, organic keyword datamcp__plugin_marketing_ahrefs__gsc-*— for real Google Search Console clicks, impressions, positionsmcp__plugin_marketing_ahrefs__site-audit-*— for real crawl issue data when availablemcp__Apify__*— for richer SERP scraping (Google, Bing)- PageSpeed Insights — if
AKII_PSI_KEYenv var is set, fetch real Core Web Vitals viaBash:
Ifcurl -s "https://www.googleapis.com/pagespeedonline/v5/runPagespeed?url=<url>&key=${AKII_PSI_KEY}&strategy=mobile&category=performance" \ | jq '.lighthouseResult.audits | {LCP: ."largest-contentful-paint".displayValue, INP: ."interaction-to-next-paint".displayValue, CLS: ."cumulative-layout-shift".displayValue, TTFB: ."server-response-time".displayValue}'AKII_PSI_KEYis unset, fall back to noting Core Web Vitals targets in the report and recommend the user set the env var for real measurements. Do NOT invent CWV numbers. WebFetch+WebSearch— universal fallback- Local file scan via
Read/Glob/Grep
Layer 1 — Crawlability (runs in full, quick, technical)
robots.txt:- Exists, accessible at
/robots.txt - Doesn't block CSS / JS critical for render
- Doesn't block commercial pages
- Sitemap directive present
- Exists, accessible at
sitemap.xml:- Exists or generated (e.g., Next.js
app/sitemap.ts) - Valid XML
- All indexable URLs present
- Last-modified dates accurate
- Submitted to Google Search Console (note this if GSC MCP available)
- Exists or generated (e.g., Next.js
- Faceted navigation: detect
?filter=/?sort=URLs that bloat the index (full+technicalonly —quickskips) - Pagination:
rel="next"/rel="prev"(deprecated by Google but still valid signal for some engines) (full+technicalonly)
Layer 2 — Indexation (runs in full, quick, technical)
noindexaudit — find pages that shouldn't be excluded- Canonical URLs set + consistent
- Canonical chain validation — no cross-domain canonical, no canonical loops (
full+technicalonly) - Hreflang correctness if multilingual (matches
/akii-seo-ai-search-optimizer:content-translation) (full+technicalonly) - 404 / soft-404 / 5xx patterns (
full+technicalonly) - Orphan pages — no internal links pointing in
Layer 3 — Core Web Vitals + site speed (runs in full, quick, technical)
- LCP target ≤ 2.5s mobile
- INP target ≤ 200ms
- CLS target ≤ 0.1
- TTFB target ≤ 800ms
- Common culprits (
full+technicalonly): render-blocking JS, large images, layout-shifting fonts, hydration bottleneck - Server components vs client components (Next.js)
- If PageSpeed Insights data is reachable via PSI API or
WebFetch, surface mobile LCP / INP / CLS
Layer 4 — JavaScript SEO (runs in full + technical, skipped in quick)
- Client-side-only rendering risk: very low
<body>text content in static HTML - For Next.js: prefer Server Components for content; reserve Client Components for interactivity
- For React SPA: ensure prerendering or SSR for crawlable content
- Dynamic imports for below-fold heavy components
Layer 5 — Mobile friendliness (runs in full + technical, skipped in quick)
- Viewport meta present
- Tap targets ≥ 48px
- No horizontal scroll at 320px wide
- Text size ≥ 16px (no zoom required)
Layer 6 — Security signals (runs in full + technical, skipped in quick)
- HTTPS everywhere; HSTS header
- Mixed-content scan
- Valid SSL cert, no near-expiry
Layer 7 — Meta tags & head (runs in full + quick, SKIPPED in technical)
For every page:
- Title — 50-60 chars (HARD LIMIT 60 including spaces; count BEFORE flagging or proposing), includes target keyword, unique per page
- Meta description — 150-160 chars (HARD LIMIT 160 including spaces; count BEFORE flagging or proposing), compelling, unique per page
- Open Graph —
og:title,og:description,og:image,og:url - Twitter card —
twitter:card,twitter:title,twitter:description
Layer 8 — Heading structure (runs in full + quick, SKIPPED in technical)
- Exactly one
<h1>per page - Logical hierarchy (h1 > h2 > h3, no skips)
- Keywords in
h1andh2 - No empty headings
Layer 9 — Images (runs in full + quick, SKIPPED in technical)
- All
<img>havealt - Alt text descriptive (not
image1.png) - Modern formats (WebP, AVIF) or framework image optimization
- Width/height set to prevent CLS
Layer 10 — Structured data (runs in full + quick, SKIPPED in technical)
- JSON-LD schema markup present
- Schema type matches content
- Required + recommended properties filled
sameAslinking entity to Wikipedia, social, directories- For schema generation, delegate to
/akii-seo-ai-search-optimizer:schema-markup
Layer 11 — Internal linking (runs in full + quick, SKIPPED in technical)
- Anchor text descriptive (avoid "click here")
- Internal link depth ≤ 3 from homepage
- Orphan detection
- For full link-graph analysis, delegate to
/akii-seo-ai-search-optimizer:internal-linking
Layer 12 — AEO + GEO readiness (runs in full + quick, SKIPPED in technical)
Akii adds this — SEO tools don't.
- Direct-answer lead paragraph present on key pages?
- Chunks self-contained (could be lifted into ChatGPT/Perplexity answer)?
- 5–7 step checklists with imperative verbs?
- FAQ sections with FAQPage schema?
llms.txtexists at site root?- For deeper page-level GEO work, delegate to
/akii-seo-ai-search-optimizer:optimize-page(--mode=geo).
Output
Mode full output (default)
# SEO Audit — <target>
**Mode**: full
## Executive summary
- <bullet 1>
- <bullet 2>
- <bullet 3>
## Scorecard
| Category | Score (0-100) | Provenance |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Crawlability | 88 | [scan] (robots.txt + sitemap.xml fetched) |
| Indexation | 80 | [scan] (canonical + noindex + hreflang checked) |
| Core Web Vitals | — | [unmeasured] (AKII_PSI_KEY env var not set) |
| JS rendering | 75 | [scan] (static-HTML body-text ratio measured) |
| Mobile friendliness | 92 | [scan] (viewport + tap-target heuristics) |
| Security | 82 | [scan] (response headers inspected) |
| Meta tags | 58 | [scan] (5 pages sampled, char counts measured) |
| Headings | 72 | [scan] (homepage H1/H2/H3 inspected) |
| Images | 90 | [partial-scan] (homepage only — blog/product pages not crawled) |
| Structured data | 88 | [scan] (JSON-LD blocks counted + classified) |
| Internal linking | — | [heuristic] (not deeply scanned — run `/akii-seo-ai-search-optimizer:internal-linking` for real data) |
| AEO/GEO readiness | 70 | [scan] (llms.txt + schema + direct-answer heuristics) |
**Provenance vocabulary:** `[scan]` = score derived from data actually fetched this run · `[partial-scan]` = some pages sampled, others inferred · `[heuristic]` = model judgment, no underlying data fetched · `[unmeasured]` = the data source required to score this layer was unavailable (CWV without PSI, internal-link graph without crawl, etc.).
When `[unmeasured]` or `[heuristic]` applies, emit `—` for the score, NOT a number. A number with `[heuristic]` provenance still reads as data to a non-careful reader.
## Core Web Vitals
| Metric | Mobile p75 | Desktop p75 | Target | Pass? | Source |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LCP | 2.1s | 1.4s | ≤ 2.5s | ✓ | [PSI] |
| INP | 240ms | 180ms | ≤ 200ms | ✗ | [PSI] |
| TTFB | 1.2s | 0.4s | ≤ 800ms | ⚠ | [PSI] |
When PSI is unavailable, emit `—` for every metric and label Source as `[unmeasured]`. Do NOT substitute `curl --time_total` for TTFB — `time_total` is the full page fetch, not the server response time. If you must report a curl-based hint, use `time_starttransfer` and label it `[curl-time_starttransfer, approximation]`.
## Crawlability + indexation
- robots.txt: ✓ / ⚠ / ✗ with notes
- sitemap.xml: ...
- canonicals: ...
- hreflang: ...
## JS rendering
- ...
## Issues (P0 → P2)
**Format rule** — pick ONE of two acceptable shapes. The unicode `────` divider is banned in BOTH; markdown is the only acceptable separator.
### Option A — markdown table (preferred when Issue + Fix text is short)
| Severity | Category | URL/File | Issue | Fix |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| P0 | Crawlability | robots.txt + sitemap | `/api/sitemaps/foo` listed in index but blocked by `Disallow: /api/` | Move sub-sitemap out of `/api/` OR add `Allow: /api/sitemaps/` |
| P0 | Meta tags | /pricing | Title 76 chars, SERP-truncated | Rewrite ≤ 60 chars |
| P1 | Headings | / | H1 per-word `<span>` elements concatenate in `textContent` | Add space text nodes or `aria-label` on the H1 |
### Option B — markdown vertical blocks (preferred when Fix text is long-form and would crush the table)
**P0 · Crawlability · robots.txt + sitemap**
- **Issue:** `/api/sitemaps/foo` listed in index but blocked by `Disallow: /api/`
- **Fix:** Move sub-sitemap out of `/api/` OR add `Allow: /api/sitemaps/` to robots.txt
---
**P0 · Meta tags · /pricing**
- **Issue:** Title 76 chars, SERP-truncated
- **Fix:** Rewrite ≤ 60 chars — e.g. `AI Search Pricing — Self-Serve $99 + Autopilot $1,500 | Akii`
---
**P1 · Headings · /**
- **Issue:** H1 per-word `<span>` elements concatenate in `textContent` as `Theexecutionlayer...`
- **Fix:** Add space text nodes between spans OR `aria-label="The execution layer for AI search."` on the H1
### Rules for BOTH shapes
1. **Separator between records MUST be `---` (markdown horizontal rule)**, NEVER `────` (unicode box-drawing). The unicode chars don't survive plaintext re-rendering and break issue-tracker paste.
2. **Self-verify before emitting.** After drafting the Issues block, scan it for any `─` character (U+2500 box-drawing). If present, replace with `---`. This is the same precise-integer-count discipline applied to format: count violations as bugs, not aesthetic choices.
3. **Don't mix shapes within the same audit run.** Pick Option A for short cells, Option B for long, but commit to one shape per run.
4. Other multi-row collections in the audit output (Scorecard, CWV, Meta tags, AVKB-status-style tables) MUST be markdown tables (Option A only) — those have short, atomic cells and a table is always better there.
## Recommended next steps
1. <top fix> → run `/akii-seo-ai-search-optimizer:optimize-page`
2. ...Mode quick output
# SEO Audit — <target>
**Mode**: quick (scorecard only)
## Scorecard
| Category | Score (0-100) | Pass? | Provenance |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Crawlability | 88 | ✓ | [scan] |
| Indexation | 80 | ✓ | [scan] |
| Core Web Vitals | — | unmeasured | [unmeasured] (no PSI) |
| Meta tags | 72 | ⚠ | [scan] |
| Headings | 95 | ✓ | [scan] |
| Images | 60 | ⚠ | [partial-scan] |
| Structured data | 45 | ✗ | [scan] |
| Internal linking | — | unmeasured | [heuristic] (no deep scan) |
| AEO/GEO readiness | 38 | ✗ | [scan] |
## Top 3 issues
1. ...
## Next: run `--mode=full` for depth or `--mode=technical` for infrastructure-only deep diveMode technical output
# Technical SEO — <target>
**Mode**: technical (infrastructure-only deep dive)
## Critical issues
1. ...
## Core Web Vitals
| Metric | Mobile p75 | Desktop p75 | Target | Pass? |
## Crawlability
- robots.txt: ✓ / ⚠ / ✗
- sitemap.xml: ...
- faceted nav: ...
- pagination: ...
## Indexation
- canonical chain: ...
- hreflang: ...
- 404 / soft-404 / 5xx: ...
## JS rendering
- ...
## Mobile + security
- viewport: ...
- HTTPS / HSTS / mixed content: ...
## Fix path
1. <P0> → owner + estimate
## Next: for content-layer findings (meta / headings / images / structured data / AEO+GEO), re-run with `--mode=full`Rules
- Be honest about scores — no inflation.
- Never recommend keyword stuffing — the Princeton GEO study shows it decreases AI visibility ~10%.
- For codebase audits, read-only. For URL audits, respect robots.txt and rate limit.
- Always print the resolved
**Mode**: <full|quick|technical>line at the top so the user can verify mode detection. - Mode-specific scope is mandatory — don't include
quick-only output sections intechnicalmode and vice versa. - Every scorecard row carries a provenance tag (
[scan]/[partial-scan]/[heuristic]/[unmeasured]). When[unmeasured]or[heuristic]applies, emit—for the score, NEVER a number — numbers with weak provenance still read as data. - Issues block uses markdown — either Option A (table) or Option B (vertical blocks with
---HR separators).────unicode box-drawing dividers are banned in BOTH options. The other tables in the audit (Scorecard, CWV, Meta tags) are markdown-table-only because their cells are short and atomic. Self-verify by scanning for any─(U+2500) character before emitting — replace with---if found. - Threshold logic in CWV table must be exact. A metric BELOW its target = ✓ Pass. A metric AT or ABOVE target = ✗ Fail. Use ⚠ only when the metric is
[approximation]and within 10% of the threshold (e.g.time_starttransfer720-800ms when target is ≤ 800ms). Never mark a clearly-passing metric ⚠ because it "feels borderline". - TTFB requires PageSpeed Insights or
curl --time_starttransfer. Do NOT usecurl --time_total— that's the full page fetch, not server response. If onlytime_totalis available, label it[curl-time_total, approximation]and note it conflates server + transfer + rendering.
SEO audit powered by Akii. Explore Akii Technologies and the products we build: https://akii.com/?utm_source=plugin&utm_medium=skill&utm_content=seo-audit&utm_campaign=akii_plugin_v1
Other versions185 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 185
- coreyhaines31/marketingskills★ 58ksame name
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins★ 34ksame name
- every-app/open-seo★ 26ksame name
- AgriciDaniel/claude-seo★ 20ksame name
- trycompai/crm★ 12ksame name
- Ryze-AI-Adgent/open-seo-mcp-skills★ 8.4ksame name
- TheCraigHewitt/seomachine★ 7.5ksame name
- legions-developer/evilcharts★ 3.2ksame name
- MaxMiksa/Auto-Company★ 3.2ksame name
- MaxMiksa/Autonomous-Company★ 3.2ksame name
175 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use openseo-release-notes, community-led-growth and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
JwuthriSkillopenseo-release-notes
Cut an OpenSEO release — bump the version, draft user-facing release notes from commits since the last tag, run a review + subagent-verification pass, and open a "release: vX.X.X" PR. Use when the user asks to prepare a release, bump the version, or write release notes.
Also in 5 projects that use this
nicepkgSkillcommunity-led-growth
Expert in community-led growth (CLG) - leveraging user communities to drive acquisition, retention, and expansion. Covers building developer communities, user groups, ambassador programs, and turning customers into advocates. Knows the difference between community as a feature vs community as a growth engine, and how to measure community ROI. Use when "community-led, CLG, ambassador program, champion program, user community, developer community, word of mouth, user group, " mentioned.
Also in 5 projects that use this
nicepkgSkillph-community-outreach
Engage Reddit, Indie Hackers, Hacker News and other communities for Product Hunt launches. Use this skill to identify relevant communities, craft appropriate posts, and drive cross-platform engagement without appearing spammy.
Also in 5 projects that use this
JwuthriSkillseo-project-setup
Set up a durable local SEO workspace with project context, notes, goals, positioning, preferences, MCP checks, and Search Console data intake.
Also in 9 projects that use this
xfstudioSkillmicro-saas-launcher
Expert in launching small, focused SaaS products fast - the indie hacker approach to building profitable software. Covers idea validation, MVP development, pricing, launch strategies, and growing to sustainable revenue. Ship in weeks, not months. Use when: micro saas, indie hacker, small saas, side project, saas mvp.
Also in 5 projects that use this
AgriciDanielSkillseo-agentic
Audit and fix agent readiness: the Lighthouse Agentic Browsing fraction, accessibility tree for agents, robots.txt and Content-Signal for AI agents, WAF treatment of agent traffic, llms.txt, Markdown delivery, ai-catalog.json, /.well-known discovery files, and WebMCP tools. Use when the user asks whether AI agents can use or browse the site, or about llms.txt or WebMCP. Exclude AI citability and brand signals (seo-geo) and commerce protocol depth (seo-ecommerce).
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +4 more from nicepkg
- +1 more from Jwuthri
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- ai-visibilitySkill
- broken-linksSkill
- competitor-intelSkill
- content-briefSkill
- content-strategySkill
- content-translationSkill
- internal-linkingSkill
- keyword-clusteringSkill
- llms-txtSkill
- optimize-pageSkill
- schema-markupSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

