skill-eval
Skill4 starsChanged 18 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when checking whether a plugin skill in this repo actually works on a real agent — does it trigger on the right prompts, stay quiet on unrelated ones, and produce better output than no skill or than its previous version. Also use before releasing a skill change, when a RED baseline is needed, or when the user says "eval this skill", "benchmark the skill", "test with a real agent", "with vs without skill", "did my skill edit help".
21 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- pedrosatin/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- thenavidm/skill-buildertheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- paureis/pau-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- michalstrnadel/source-to-skilltheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- davidscotttufts/hyvemindtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- AbdouMoumen/claude-skills-plugintheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use mutation-test, postmortem and 5 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
squall-chuaSkillmutation-test
Break the source on purpose, find the mutants the tests fail to catch, and report each survivor with the behaviour nobody is checking.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Hongyu-yuSkillpostmortem
Use when analyzing failures, outages, incidents, or negative outcomes, conducting blameless postmortems, documenting root causes with 5 Whys or fishbone diagrams, identifying corrective actions with owners and timelines, learning from near-misses, establishing prevention strategies, or when user mentions postmortem, incident review, failure analysis, RCA, lessons learned, or after-action review.
Also in 3 projects that use this
nicolasestremSkillbrainstorm
Structured idea generation and solution exploration with systematic analysis.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillhandoff
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
Also in 5 projects that use this
NVIDIASkillresearch
Before designing a feature, research how comparable libraries solve the problem, check best practices, known pitfalls, and upstream changes. Use when starting a new feature, investigating an unfamiliar area, or the user asks to research something.
Also in 3 projects that use this
SentrySkillreview
Fixture review skill.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions21 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 21
- boshu2/agentops★ 453same name
- IndelibleVivi/skill-field-lab★ 13same name
- joris887/exosuit★ 9same name
- sunitghub/canon-skills★ 9same name
- michalstrnadel/source-to-skill★ 8same name
- greglas75/zuvo★ 7same name
- databricks-industry-solutions/hls-skills★ 6same name
- sean2077/skills★ 5same name
- ArangoGutierrez/claude-toolkit★ 4same name
- paureis/pau-skills★ 2same name
11 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository3 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- docs/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- validateSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 19 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 61
Before trusting a judge item, open the grading.json evidence for at least one run.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 19 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
skill-eval
Runs headless claude -p agents on a suite of prompts, once per arm, then scores each run.
| Arm | What the agent sees |
with | plugins/<plugin> from the working tree |
without | no plugin |
against | plugins/<plugin> at --against <git-ref>, for old-vs-new comparisons |
Every run uses a fresh temp workdir outside the repo with --setting-sources project,local --strict-mcp-config. User plugins, hooks, MCP servers and the global CLAUDE.md are not loaded, so the only non-built-in skill an arm can see is the one under test. Trigger rates are therefore measured without competition from other installed skills.
Run
EVAL=.claude/skills/skill-eval/skill-eval.py
python3 $EVAL run evals/<plugin>/<suite>.json --model sonnet --reps 3 --budget 1
python3 $EVAL run evals/<plugin>/<suite>.json --arms with,against --against HEAD # did my uncommitted edit help?
python3 $EVAL grade evals/<plugin>/runs/<run-id> # re-grade after editing checks/rubricrun --help lists every flag. Output goes to evals/<plugin>/runs/<suite>-<timestamp>/ (gitignored): summary.md holds the table, and each <case>/<arm>-<rep>/ holds transcript.jsonl, run.json (tool calls, cost, turns, final reply), grading.json and work/ (files after the run).
Each run is a paid model call. Run 1 rep on one --case first, read its transcript, then scale up.
Suite format
evals/<plugin>/<suite>.json. Example: evals/aio-anti-slop/prose.json.
{
"plugin": "aio-anti-slop", "skill": "aio-anti-slop",
"permission_mode": "acceptEdits", "allowed_tools": ["Bash"],
"cases": [{
"id": "readme-robotic",
"prompt": "Our README.md sounds robotic ...",
"files": {"README.md": "seed content"},
"trigger": true,
"checks": [{"desc": "install command kept", "file": "README.md", "regex": "bun add tinyq"},
{"desc": "answers O(log n)", "output": true, "not_regex": "..."}],
"rubric": ["README.md adds no new factual claims"]
}]
}trigger: whether the skill should load in plugin arms. Setfalsefor unrelated prompts to measure false triggers. It's detected fromSkill/Read …/SKILL.mdtool calls in the transcript, not from the agent's own account.checks: regex tests against a workdirfileor the final reply (output: true). They're cheap and deterministic, so use them for anything a regex can decide.rubric: judged by a separate blindclaude -pcall (--judge-model, defaultsonnet). The judge sees the task, the final reply and the workdir files, but not the arm.permission_mode/allowed_tools: headless runs deny any tool that would prompt. Addallowed_toolswhen the skill runs scripts, and check thedenialscolumn.
Reading results
- Score is the fraction of trigger, check and rubric items passed, averaged over reps. The number that matters is the difference between arms, not the absolute score.
- An item that passes in every arm doesn't discriminate. Replace it with one the baseline fails.
- High variance across reps means you need more reps or a more specific prompt before drawing a conclusion.
- Before trusting a judge item, open the
grading.jsonevidence for at least one run.
Common mistakes
- Writing only should-trigger cases. Always include at least one prompt that must not trigger the skill.
- Seed files that already pass the checks. The
withoutarm has to fail them, or the case measures nothing. - Copying the skill's own trigger phrases into the prompt. Write the request the way a user would actually phrase it.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

