agentleFS
ahmedsakriahmedsakri/youtube-agent-pro/skills/yt-audit/SKILL.md

yt-audit

Skill1 starsChanged 37 days agoMITView on GitHub

Audit a YouTube channel end to end - packaging, consistency, the first fifteen seconds, and what to fix first. Use for "audit my channel", "why isn't my channel growing", "review my videos", or a pasted channel URL.

5 other projects use a version of this, 5 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 2 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 2

    Common

    Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read the shared operating guide for profile lookup, helper paths, capability limits, and cross-skill routing before using this workflow.

    line 11
  2. Very specific:

    Use the creator's supplied voice profile or context, then a local ~/.claude/youtube/voice.md if available, following the operating guide.

    line 18
  3. Common:

    Never invent a number, a result or a source.

    line 21
  4. Very specific:

    The last ten titles, as a set: Read them as a list, the way the channel page shows them.

    line 26
  5. Common:

    Never open an audit with praise you do not mean, and never end one with a list of twenty things.

    line 45

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

yt-audit

Read the shared operating guide for profile lookup, helper paths, capability limits, and cross-skill routing before using this workflow.

An audit that lists twenty problems is a way of avoiding the one that matters. This ends in ONE fix.

Before you write

  1. Use the creator's supplied voice profile or context, then a local ~/.claude/youtube/voice.md if available, following the operating guide. If absent, draft in a clear voice using the stated audience and format; do not make voice-profile setup a prerequisite.
  2. Never invent a number, a result or a source. If a figure would strengthen it and you do not have one, ask for it or write the line without it.

What to look at, in this order

  1. The last ten titles, as a set. Read them as a list, the way the channel page shows them. Do they promise different things? Run them through ../yt-package/title.py. A channel where every title is the same shape has a format problem, not a title problem.
  2. The thumbnails, at feed size. Shrink them. What survives? If three of them are unreadable at that size, that is the fix and nothing else matters yet.
  3. The first fifteen seconds of the three most recent. Transcribe them and score with ../yt-script/hookscore.py. This is where most channels lose.
  4. Upload rhythm and capacity. Compare formats, publication age, and performance before attributing a result to frequency. A sustainable cadence helps planning, but consistency alone does not establish how YouTube will distribute a video.
  5. The retention shape, if they can export it. /youtube-agent-pro:yt-retention.

What to hand back

  • The single biggest fix, named, with what to do this week.
  • Three things that are already working, so they do not break them. Be specific; "your energy is good" is not an observation.
  • What NOT to do yet, and why.

Never open an audit with praise you do not mean, and never end one with a list of twenty things.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.