agentleFS
afaraha8403afaraha8403/balakit/.cursor/rules/changelog.mdc

balakit / rules

Cursor rule1 starsChanged 8 days agoMITView on GitHub

Maintain CHANGELOG.md for significant changes; grouped by type (Features, Fixes, Changes); source for GitHub release notes

The file

We split this changelog.mdc into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Update CHANGELOG.md (at project root) whenever you or the user:

    line 10
  2. Distinctive:

    Add a new feature

    line 12
  3. Distinctive:

    Remove or deprecate something user-facing

    line 15
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not add trivial edits (typos, comment-only, formatting-only) unless the user asks.

    line 17
  5. Very specific:

    If CHANGELOG.md does not exist, create it with a title, an ## [Unreleased] section, and add the relevant entry/entries.

    line 64

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 6,668 Cursor rule files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
changelog.mdc
---
description: Maintain CHANGELOG.md for significant changes; grouped by type (Features, Fixes, Changes); source for GitHub release notes
alwaysApply: true
---

# Changelog maintenance

## When to update

Update `CHANGELOG.md` (at project root) whenever you or the user:

- Add a **new feature**
- Ship a **significant fix** (bug fix that affects behavior or correctness)
- Make a **notable change** (refactor, config, dependency, or UX change worth documenting)
- Remove or deprecate something user-facing

Do **not** add trivial edits (typos, comment-only, formatting-only) unless the user asks.

## Format (grouped by type)

- **Unreleased at top.** The first section is `## [Unreleased]` for changes not yet in a release.
- **Released versions below.** Each release has a section `## [vX.Y.Z]` or `## [X.Y.Z]` (e.g. `## [v0.0.1-beta.7]`, `## [1.0.0]`). Use the exact version string that will be tagged (with or without leading `v`).
- **Newest release first** under Unreleased. When you cut a release, the previous `[Unreleased]` content can be moved under a new `## [vX.Y.Z]` section.
- **Group by type.** Within each version section, organize entries under three subsections: `### Features`, `### Fixes`, `### Changes`.
- **No type prefix.** Items do not need `**Feature:**`, `**Fix:**`, or `**Change:**` prefixes since they are grouped by section.
- One line per item; keep text concise.

Structure:

```markdown
# Changelog

## [Unreleased]

### Features
- Short description of new feature.
- Another feature.

### Fixes
- Bug fix description.
- Another fix.

### Changes
- Refactor or UX change description.

## [v0.0.1-beta.7]

### Features
- Something shipped in this version.

### Changes
- Another change.

## [v0.0.1-beta.6]
- ...
```

## Releases and GitHub

If the project uses a tag-triggered release workflow, it typically looks in `CHANGELOG.md` for a section whose heading matches the pushed tag (e.g. `## [v1.2.3]` or `## [1.2.3]`) and uses that section as the release notes body. Add the version section before tagging so the release notes are populated; if it's missing, the release should still succeed with a default body.

## If the file is missing

If `CHANGELOG.md` does not exist, create it with a title, an `## [Unreleased]` section, and add the relevant entry/entries.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.