agentleFS
afaraha8403afaraha8403/balakit/.agents/skills/refreshing-app-verify/SKILL.md

refreshing-app-verify

Skill1 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub

Keep a generated verification skill and feature map honest: source wave per feature, one live pass driving every feature, at most one PR of proven corrections. Apply when the user invokes /refreshing-app-verify or asks to audit the verify skill. Use generating-app-verify if none exists. Never edit product code on this pass.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Only the verification skill directory.

    line 41

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Refresh an app verify skill

Leading words: source then live, proven corrections, never product code.

Upkeep for a skill from generating-app-verify. The unit is the feature, not every sentence.

Copy these steps into the todo list verbatim. Skip with skip: <reason>.

  1. Locate skills/verify-*/ (or the project's verify skill). None → stop and point at generating-app-verify.
  2. Index hygiene on the feature-map README.
  3. Source wave: one read-only subagent per feature file. Children never drive or edit.
  4. Reconcile recipes. Flag user-facing surfaces missing from the map only with a source path.
  5. Live pass: exercise every feature at least once. Doctor before first drive and after failed drives. Evidence survives cleanup.
  6. Triage: map drift → fix the map. Harness gap → fix harness. App broken → report, do not paper over.
  7. Outcome: clean (no PR) / changed (one PR of proven corrections) / blocked (say what blocked).

Edit scope

Only the verification skill directory. A behavior the map describes that the app no longer does is doc drift (fix the map) or a product regression (report it).

Reply contract

Outcome, features covered, unreachable prerequisites, confirmed drift.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.