agentleFS
ZunoSmartLabsZunoSmartLabs/zsl-superpowers/skills/engineering/human-itl/SKILL.md

human-itl

Skill2 starsChanged 52 days agoMITView on GitHub

Walk a human through the manual-action [HITL] sub-tasks of a parent (PRD) issue — the steps a coding agent physically cannot perform — recording each as an audit trail and marking them done so the dependent [AFK] slices unblock, then hand back to /tdd-parallel. Use when /tdd-parallel skipped HITL slices, when the user wants to clear manual steps before a fanout, or when the user invokes /human-itl directly.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Hard refuse decision slices: If a slice is really a decision in disguise (Decide auth provider, Pick the cache strategy), do not walk the …

    line 32
  2. Very specific:

    If a "HITL" slice turns out to be implementable code, it's mislabeled — say so and tell the user it belongs in the AFK fanout ([AFK]).

    line 39
  3. Very specific:

    Ask the user for a one-line confirmation note (what they did.

    line 88
  4. Very specific:

    If the action embodies a decision worth keeping (a chosen provider, a negotiated limit), write or update an ADR — lazily, like …

    line 91

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Human in the loop

/tdd-parallel fans out only the [AFK] slices of a PRD — the ones an agent can run unattended. The [HITL] slices it skips need a human's hands or authority. This skill is the serial, human-present counterpart: it walks you through each manual-action slice, records what you did, and marks it done so the [AFK] slices that were Blocked by it unblock.

It does not write code or run red-green-refactor — that's /tdd. A [HITL] slice is a manual action, not a unit of TDD work.

What counts as HITL

A legitimate [HITL] slice requires a manual action a coding agent physically cannot perform:

  • Clicking through a third-party console (DNS registrar, cloud dashboard).
  • Rotating or issuing a real credential / secret / certificate.
  • Obtaining external sign-off (legal, security, a stakeholder).
  • Running a one-off production migration or cut-over by hand.

It is not an architectural decision or a design review. Those must be resolved upstream via /grill-with-docs and recorded as ADRs before issues are cut, so slices fall out maximally AFK — see /to-issues.

Hard refuse decision slices. If a slice is really a decision in disguise (Decide auth provider, Pick the cache strategy), do not walk the user through it. Flag it as a process leak and stop on that slice: tell the user to resolve it with /grill-with-docs + an ADR, then relabel it and its dependents [AFK] and re-run the fanout. Continue with the remaining genuine [HITL] slices.

If a "HITL" slice turns out to be implementable code, it's mislabeled — say so and tell the user it belongs in the AFK fanout ([AFK]).

Usage

/zsl:human-itl <parent-issue>   # clear all HITL slices of a PRD
/zsl:human-itl <hitl-issue>     # clear one HITL slice
/zsl:human-itl                  # no arg → picker of open HITL slices

Process

1. Pre-flight

  • docs/agents/issue-tracker.md exists (run /setup-zsl-superpowers if not). docs/agents/triage-labels.md exists.
  • Resolve the input. A parent issue → its sub-issues. A single issue → just that one. No argument → fetch open [HITL] issues carrying the configured ready-for-agent label and present a numbered picker.
  • Refuse a container issue (one with open sub-issues that is itself titled [HITL]) the same way the other skills do.

2. Discover the slices

Using docs/agents/issue-tracker.md conventions, fetch the parent's sub-issues. Keep only those that are:

  • Open
  • Title starts with [HITL]
  • Carry the configured ready-for-agent label
  • Not a container

Parse each slice's ## Blocked by section. A [HITL] slice may itself be blocked by an [AFK] slice that a prior fanout already merged — process slices in dependency order, skipping any whose blockers aren't satisfied yet (report them as "still blocked").

3. Walk the slices

Show the user the buckets first — To clear (numbered), Still blocked (issue + unmet blockers), Refused — decision slice (issue + why) — and confirm before starting.

Then, for each slice in dependency order:

  1. Present the slice: title, the ## What to build action, and the ## Acceptance criteria ("Done when") checklist.
  2. Pause. The user performs the manual action out of band.
  3. Ask the user for a one-line confirmation note (what they did; any id/link/ticket as evidence). Post it as a comment on the issue per docs/agents/issue-tracker.md — this is the audit trail.
  4. If the action embodies a decision worth keeping (a chosen provider, a negotiated limit), write or update an ADR — lazily, like /grill-with-docs. Don't batch; capture it now.
  5. Mark the issue done per the tracker convention (close it / git mv into issues/_done/ for local-markdown). This is what unblocks the dependent [AFK] slices.

4. Finish

Print a summary: slices cleared (issue + note), slices still blocked, slices refused as decision leaks. Then stop with the explicit next step — do not chain:

Cleared N HITL slices. Run /tdd-parallel <parent> to fan out the now-unblocked AFK work.

Not in scope

  • Writing code or running red-green-refactor — that's /tdd.
  • Resolving decisions — that's /grill-with-docs + an ADR, upstream.
  • Invoking /tdd-parallel for the user — this skill ends with the hint.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.