human-itl
Skill2 starsChanged 52 days agoMITView on GitHub
Walk a human through the manual-action [HITL] sub-tasks of a parent (PRD) issue — the steps a coding agent physically cannot perform — recording each as an audit trail and marking them done so the dependent [AFK] slices unblock, then hand back to /tdd-parallel. Use when /tdd-parallel skipped HITL slices, when the user wants to clear manual steps before a fanout, or when the user invokes /human-itl directly.
In this repository32 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- ask-zslSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- commit-push-prSkill
- commitSkill
- decision-mappingSkill
- diagnoseSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- git-branchSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- prototypeSkill
- setup-zsl-superpowersSkill
- tdd-parallelSkill
- tddSkill
- teach-me-the-codebaseSkill
- to-issuesSkill
- to-prdSkill
- triageSkill
- verify-coverageSkill
- edit-articleSkill
- setup-pre-commitSkill
- steampipeSkill
- grillingSkill
- grill-meSkill
- handoffSkill
- timesheetSkill
- writing-great-skillsSkill
- afk-fanoutSkill
- afk-workerSkill
- morning-reviewSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 32
Hard refuse decision slices: If a slice is really a decision in disguise (Decide auth provider, Pick the cache strategy), do not walk the …
- Very specific: line 39
If a "HITL" slice turns out to be implementable code, it's mislabeled — say so and tell the user it belongs in the AFK fanout ([AFK]).
- Very specific: line 88
Ask the user for a one-line confirmation note (what they did.
- Very specific: line 91
If the action embodies a decision worth keeping (a chosen provider, a negotiated limit), write or update an ADR — lazily, like …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Human in the loop
/tdd-parallel fans out only the [AFK] slices of a PRD — the ones an
agent can run unattended. The [HITL] slices it skips need a human's
hands or authority. This skill is the serial, human-present counterpart:
it walks you through each manual-action slice, records what you did, and
marks it done so the [AFK] slices that were Blocked by it unblock.
It does not write code or run red-green-refactor — that's /tdd. A
[HITL] slice is a manual action, not a unit of TDD work.
What counts as HITL
A legitimate [HITL] slice requires a manual action a coding agent
physically cannot perform:
- Clicking through a third-party console (DNS registrar, cloud dashboard).
- Rotating or issuing a real credential / secret / certificate.
- Obtaining external sign-off (legal, security, a stakeholder).
- Running a one-off production migration or cut-over by hand.
It is not an architectural decision or a design review. Those must be
resolved upstream via /grill-with-docs and recorded as ADRs before
issues are cut, so slices fall out maximally AFK — see /to-issues.
Hard refuse decision slices. If a slice is really a decision in
disguise (Decide auth provider, Pick the cache strategy), do not
walk the user through it. Flag it as a process leak and stop on that
slice: tell the user to resolve it with /grill-with-docs + an ADR, then
relabel it and its dependents [AFK] and re-run the fanout. Continue with
the remaining genuine [HITL] slices.
If a "HITL" slice turns out to be implementable code, it's mislabeled —
say so and tell the user it belongs in the AFK fanout ([AFK]).
Usage
/zsl:human-itl <parent-issue> # clear all HITL slices of a PRD
/zsl:human-itl <hitl-issue> # clear one HITL slice
/zsl:human-itl # no arg → picker of open HITL slicesProcess
1. Pre-flight
docs/agents/issue-tracker.mdexists (run/setup-zsl-superpowersif not).docs/agents/triage-labels.mdexists.- Resolve the input. A parent issue → its sub-issues. A single issue →
just that one. No argument → fetch open
[HITL]issues carrying the configuredready-for-agentlabel and present a numbered picker. - Refuse a container issue (one with open sub-issues that is itself
titled
[HITL]) the same way the other skills do.
2. Discover the slices
Using docs/agents/issue-tracker.md conventions, fetch the parent's
sub-issues. Keep only those that are:
- Open
- Title starts with
[HITL] - Carry the configured
ready-for-agentlabel - Not a container
Parse each slice's ## Blocked by section. A [HITL] slice may itself be
blocked by an [AFK] slice that a prior fanout already merged — process
slices in dependency order, skipping any whose blockers aren't satisfied
yet (report them as "still blocked").
3. Walk the slices
Show the user the buckets first — To clear (numbered), Still blocked (issue + unmet blockers), Refused — decision slice (issue + why) — and confirm before starting.
Then, for each slice in dependency order:
- Present the slice: title, the
## What to buildaction, and the## Acceptance criteria("Done when") checklist. - Pause. The user performs the manual action out of band.
- Ask the user for a one-line confirmation note (what they did; any
id/link/ticket as evidence). Post it as a comment on the issue per
docs/agents/issue-tracker.md— this is the audit trail. - If the action embodies a decision worth keeping (a chosen provider, a
negotiated limit), write or update an ADR — lazily, like
/grill-with-docs. Don't batch; capture it now. - Mark the issue done per the tracker convention (close it /
git mvintoissues/_done/for local-markdown). This is what unblocks the dependent[AFK]slices.
4. Finish
Print a summary: slices cleared (issue + note), slices still blocked, slices refused as decision leaks. Then stop with the explicit next step — do not chain:
Cleared N HITL slices. Run
/tdd-parallel <parent>to fan out the now-unblocked AFK work.
Not in scope
- Writing code or running red-green-refactor — that's
/tdd. - Resolving decisions — that's
/grill-with-docs+ an ADR, upstream. - Invoking
/tdd-parallelfor the user — this skill ends with the hint.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

