seo-google
Skill10 starsChanged 27 days agoMITView on GitHub
Pulls real Google field data — Search Console search analytics (impressions, clicks, CTR, position), URL Inspection and sitemap status, PageSpeed Insights and CrUX Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS), and GA4 organic traffic. Uses a connected Search Console MCP or Google APIs when available; otherwise runs built-in on-page technical and GEO checks and names exactly what to connect for field data. Trigger when the user says "search console", "GSC", "PageSpeed", "CrUX", "field data", "GA4 organic", "URL inspection", or "real CWV data".
19 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- seranking/seo-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- alpit-patel/seo-aeo-geo-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- zhtyyx/codex-seotheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- joaoguirunas/team-ostheir own version, first seen Oct 21, 2026
- susantedit/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- webdevarif/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use seo-agentic.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
AgriciDanielSkillseo-agentic
Audit and fix agent readiness: the Lighthouse Agentic Browsing fraction, accessibility tree for agents, robots.txt and Content-Signal for AI agents, WAF treatment of agent traffic, llms.txt, Markdown delivery, ai-catalog.json, /.well-known discovery files, and WebMCP tools. Use when the user asks whether AI agents can use or browse the site, or about llms.txt or WebMCP. Exclude AI citability and brand signals (seo-geo) and commerce protocol depth (seo-ecommerce).
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions19 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 19
- AgriciDaniel/claude-seo★ 30ksame name
- seranking/seo-skills★ 201same name
- zhtyyx/codex-seo★ 152same name
- joaoguirunas/team-os★ 6same name
- avalonreset/legends-seo-dungeon★ 4same name
- alpit-patel/seo-aeo-geo-kit★ 2same name
- amirjahfar1/automate-seo-with-claude★ 2same name
- agrivisionai/claude-skills★ 1same name
- mahiunfiltered/claude-code-skills★ 1same name
- ahmedaminsa/aljazeera360-mcp-server★ 0same name
9 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository46 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- blast-promptSkill
- client-outreachSkill
- content-draftSkill
- copywritingSkill
- csv-to-reportSkill
- design-accessibilitySkill
- design-buildSkill
- design-croSkill
- design-dimensionsSkill
- design-motionSkill
- design-researchSkill
- design-system-genSkill
- design-system-persistSkill
- design-tokens-emitSkill
- design-visual-qaSkill
- html-extractSkill
- parallel-buildSkill
- portable-html-portSkill
- qa-gateSkill
- route-codex-reviewSkill
- route-gemini-contextSkill
- route-three-brainSkill
- seo-auditSkill
- seo-backlinksSkill
- seo-clusterSkill
- seo-competitor-pagesSkill
- seo-content-briefSkill
- seo-contentSkill
- seo-dataforseoSkill
- seo-driftSkill
- seo-ecommerceSkill
- seo-firecrawlSkill
- seo-geoSkill
- seo-hreflangSkill
- seo-image-auditSkill
- seo-image-genSkill
- seo-local-unifiedSkill
- seo-pageSkill
- seo-programmaticSkill
- seo-schemaSkill
- seo-sitemapSkill
- seo-strategySkill
- seo-sxoSkill
- seo-technicalSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 18 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 45
Detect available tooling: Run python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/workflow/capability_probe.py" (env keys) and check whether a Search …
- Distinctive: line 47
Field-data path (Tier 1, if connected): Call the connected GSC/Google MCP or Google APIs for the requested signal.
- Distinctive: line 63
Tier 1 — Google data: If a Search Console / Google MCP or Google APIs are connected, use them for true field data (GSC analytics, CrUX CWV, …
- Distinctive: line 67
Tier 4 — guided: If a request strictly needs field data (e.g.
- Distinctive: line 71
Always state which tier ran and what connecting Google would add.
- Very specific: line 90
When connected, this is the field-data source of truth the rest of the SEO family defers to for "is this actually a problem for real …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 18 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
seo-google
Family: seo Status: Stable
Purpose
The "real field data" layer for the SEO family — Google's own measurements of how
real users experience a site, versus the synthetic/lab heuristics in seo-technical.
It is tool-aware: when a Google Search Console MCP (or Google APIs) is connected
it returns true field data; when nothing is connected it still delivers a real
on-page technical + GEO read and names precisely what to connect to unlock field
data. It never just fails.
What field data adds when connected:
- Search Console — impressions, clicks, CTR, average position; URL Inspection; sitemap status
- PageSpeed Insights / CrUX — real-user Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS), with CrUX's multi-week history
- GA4 — organic traffic, engagement, conversions
Triggers
- "search console" / "GSC"
- "pagespeed" / "PSI"
- "crux" / "field data" / "real CWV data"
- "indexing api" / "URL inspection"
- "ga4 organic" / "ga4 seo"
- "LCP" / "INP" / "CLS" / "FCP" / "TTFB"
- "impressions" / "clicks" / "CTR" / "position"
Inputs
- Domain or page URL
- Which signal is wanted (search analytics | URL inspection | field CWV | organic traffic)
- Optional: date range / comparison window
Steps
- Detect available tooling. Run
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/workflow/capability_probe.py"(env keys) and check whether a Search Console / Google MCP is exposed this session. - Field-data path (Tier 1, if connected). Call the connected GSC/Google MCP or Google APIs for the requested signal; normalize into a compact table; for CrUX, overlay the available history.
- Built-in path (Tier 2, always available). Fetch the page with WebFetch and
run
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/seo/tech_audit.py"(on-page technical: title/meta, canonical, robots, viewport, structured-data presence, security headers, INP<200ms guidance) andpython3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/seo/geo_check.py"(AI-citability + llms.txt). This is real, useful output on its own — it just isn't field data. - Report which tier ran and, if field data wasn't available, the one-line setup to unlock it (connect a Search Console MCP, or set Google API OAuth).
Capability routing
This skill follows the plugin's capability-tier cascade
(references/CAPABILITY-TIERS.md):
- Tier 1 — Google data. If a Search Console / Google MCP or Google APIs are connected, use them for true field data (GSC analytics, CrUX CWV, GA4 organic).
- Tier 2 — built-in (default). Otherwise WebFetch +
tech_audit.py+geo_check.pyfor an on-page technical + GEO read. Lab/heuristic, not field. - Tier 4 — guided. If a request strictly needs field data (e.g. impressions) and no Google tool is connected, deliver the built-in read and name the exact setup to unlock the field metric.
Always state which tier ran and what connecting Google would add.
Outputs
- The requested signal as a compact table (field data when Tier 1; on-page + GEO findings when Tier 2)
- For CWV: the metric with its target (LCP<2.5s / CLS<0.1 / INP<200ms) and, on Tier 1, real-user values
- A one-line "to unlock field data, connect …" note when running built-in
Dependencies
- Optional (Tier 1): a Google Search Console MCP, or Google APIs via OAuth — adds real field data; free path below works without them
- Built-in (Tier 2): WebFetch;
scripts/seo/tech_audit.py;scripts/seo/geo_check.py scripts/workflow/capability_probe.py(capability detection)
Notes
When connected, this is the field-data source of truth the rest of the SEO family
defers to for "is this actually a problem for real users?" seo-technical covers
the synthetic/lab side. Related: seo-geo (AI-citability depth).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

