agentleFS
ZachArticulateVZachArticulateV/designer-pro-and-seo/skills/seo-google/SKILL.md

seo-google

Skill10 starsChanged 27 days agoMITView on GitHub

Pulls real Google field data — Search Console search analytics (impressions, clicks, CTR, position), URL Inspection and sitemap status, PageSpeed Insights and CrUX Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS), and GA4 organic traffic. Uses a connected Search Console MCP or Google APIs when available; otherwise runs built-in on-page technical and GEO checks and names exactly what to connect for field data. Trigger when the user says "search console", "GSC", "PageSpeed", "CrUX", "field data", "GA4 organic", "URL inspection", or "real CWV data".

19 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use seo-agentic.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • AgriciDanielSkill

    seo-agentic

    Audit and fix agent readiness: the Lighthouse Agentic Browsing fraction, accessibility tree for agents, robots.txt and Content-Signal for AI agents, WAF treatment of agent traffic, llms.txt, Markdown delivery, ai-catalog.json, /.well-known discovery files, and WebMCP tools. Use when the user asks whether AI agents can use or browse the site, or about llms.txt or WebMCP. Exclude AI citability and brand signals (seo-geo) and commerce protocol depth (seo-ecommerce).

    Also in 4 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 18 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Detect available tooling: Run python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/workflow/capability_probe.py" (env keys) and check whether a Search …

    line 45
  2. Distinctive:

    Field-data path (Tier 1, if connected): Call the connected GSC/Google MCP or Google APIs for the requested signal.

    line 47
  3. Distinctive:

    Tier 1 — Google data: If a Search Console / Google MCP or Google APIs are connected, use them for true field data (GSC analytics, CrUX CWV, …

    line 63
  4. Distinctive:

    Tier 4 — guided: If a request strictly needs field data (e.g.

    line 67
  5. Distinctive:

    Always state which tier ran and what connecting Google would add.

    line 71
  6. Very specific:

    When connected, this is the field-data source of truth the rest of the SEO family defers to for "is this actually a problem for real …

    line 90

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 18 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

seo-google

Family: seo Status: Stable

Purpose

The "real field data" layer for the SEO family — Google's own measurements of how real users experience a site, versus the synthetic/lab heuristics in seo-technical. It is tool-aware: when a Google Search Console MCP (or Google APIs) is connected it returns true field data; when nothing is connected it still delivers a real on-page technical + GEO read and names precisely what to connect to unlock field data. It never just fails.

What field data adds when connected:

  • Search Console — impressions, clicks, CTR, average position; URL Inspection; sitemap status
  • PageSpeed Insights / CrUX — real-user Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS), with CrUX's multi-week history
  • GA4 — organic traffic, engagement, conversions

Triggers

  • "search console" / "GSC"
  • "pagespeed" / "PSI"
  • "crux" / "field data" / "real CWV data"
  • "indexing api" / "URL inspection"
  • "ga4 organic" / "ga4 seo"
  • "LCP" / "INP" / "CLS" / "FCP" / "TTFB"
  • "impressions" / "clicks" / "CTR" / "position"

Inputs

  • Domain or page URL
  • Which signal is wanted (search analytics | URL inspection | field CWV | organic traffic)
  • Optional: date range / comparison window

Steps

  1. Detect available tooling. Run python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/workflow/capability_probe.py" (env keys) and check whether a Search Console / Google MCP is exposed this session.
  2. Field-data path (Tier 1, if connected). Call the connected GSC/Google MCP or Google APIs for the requested signal; normalize into a compact table; for CrUX, overlay the available history.
  3. Built-in path (Tier 2, always available). Fetch the page with WebFetch and run python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/seo/tech_audit.py" (on-page technical: title/meta, canonical, robots, viewport, structured-data presence, security headers, INP<200ms guidance) and python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/seo/geo_check.py" (AI-citability + llms.txt). This is real, useful output on its own — it just isn't field data.
  4. Report which tier ran and, if field data wasn't available, the one-line setup to unlock it (connect a Search Console MCP, or set Google API OAuth).

Capability routing

This skill follows the plugin's capability-tier cascade (references/CAPABILITY-TIERS.md):

  1. Tier 1 — Google data. If a Search Console / Google MCP or Google APIs are connected, use them for true field data (GSC analytics, CrUX CWV, GA4 organic).
  2. Tier 2 — built-in (default). Otherwise WebFetch + tech_audit.py + geo_check.py for an on-page technical + GEO read. Lab/heuristic, not field.
  3. Tier 4 — guided. If a request strictly needs field data (e.g. impressions) and no Google tool is connected, deliver the built-in read and name the exact setup to unlock the field metric.

Always state which tier ran and what connecting Google would add.

Outputs

  • The requested signal as a compact table (field data when Tier 1; on-page + GEO findings when Tier 2)
  • For CWV: the metric with its target (LCP<2.5s / CLS<0.1 / INP<200ms) and, on Tier 1, real-user values
  • A one-line "to unlock field data, connect …" note when running built-in

Dependencies

  • Optional (Tier 1): a Google Search Console MCP, or Google APIs via OAuth — adds real field data; free path below works without them
  • Built-in (Tier 2): WebFetch; scripts/seo/tech_audit.py; scripts/seo/geo_check.py
  • scripts/workflow/capability_probe.py (capability detection)

Notes

When connected, this is the field-data source of truth the rest of the SEO family defers to for "is this actually a problem for real users?" seo-technical covers the synthetic/lab side. Related: seo-geo (AI-citability depth).

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.