paper-figure
Skill8 starsChanged 8 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub
Generate publication-quality figures and tables from experiment results. Use when user says \"画图\", \"作图\", \"generate figures\", \"paper figures\", or needs plots for a paper.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. 4 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
4
Common
Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Other versions12 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 8
- wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep★ 18k75% same
- zjunlp/Mechanist★ 7540% same
- Chanw-research/claude-code-paper-writing★ 4299% same
- catalsqlb-cmd/Prism-H★ 1699% same
- Yulivu/debuffer-skills★ 982% same
- yvesory/academic-research-suite★ 963% same
- raja21068/AutoResearch★ 299% same
- talhaMah56/claude_skills★ 076% same
Wrote their own version · 4
- cabbage2000-lab/paper-tutor-skills★ 43same name
- 296711867/figcraft-skills★ 13same name
- Niko-mzz/Doctor-Ge-SCI-paper-Writing★ 4same name
- ShinKiHun/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use resubmit-pipeline, research-refine and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
raja21068Skillresubmit-pipeline
Workflow 5: orchestrate a text-only resubmit of a polished paper to a different venue under hard constraints (no new experiments, no bib edits, no framework changes, never overwrite prior submissions). Phase 0 physical isolation, Phase 0.5 health + anonymity check, Phase 1 audit (proof / claim / citation), Phase 2 microedits via auto-loop with edit-whitelist + citation-audit --soft-only, Phase 3 kill-argument adversarial gate, Phase 4 final compile + Overleaf push via /overleaf-sync. Use when user says \"resubmit pipeline\", \"重投流程\", \"port paper to <new venue>\", \"resubmit to <venue>\", \"tighten paper for resubmission\", or has a rejected/withdrawn paper to move to a different top venue under tight time budget.
Also in 5 projects that use this
raja21068Skillresearch-refine
Turn a vague research direction into a problem-anchored, elegant, frontier-aware, implementation-oriented method plan via iterative GPT-5.4 review. Use when the user says "refine my approach", "帮我细化方案", "decompose this problem", "打磨idea", "refine research plan", "细化研究方案", or wants a concrete research method that stays simple, focused, and top-venue ready instead of a vague or overbuilt idea.
Also in 8 projects that use this
PostHogSkillexperiment-audit
Audit a PostHog A/B experiment for a customer — verify config, exposure, attribution, and metrics. Trigger phrases include \"audit [customer]'s experiment\", \"audit the [name] experiment\", \"check experiment setup for [customer]\", \"validate this A/B test\", or any request to review whether an experiment is correctly wired up. Assumes you already have MCP access to the customer's project (typically via the impersonation flow set up by the `impersonate-audit` wrapper that ships with this plugin).
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +9 more from raja21068
In this repository26 other files it gives its agents.
- analyze-resultsSkill
- arxivSkill
- auto-paper-improvement-loopSkill
- auto-review-loop-llmSkill
- auto-review-loop-minimaxSkill
- auto-review-loopSkill
- dse-loopSkill
- feishu-notifySkill
- idea-creatorSkill
- idea-discovery-robotSkill
- idea-discoverySkill
- idea-validationSkill
- monitor-experimentSkill
- novelty-checkSkill
- paper-compileSkill
- paper-planSkill
- paper-writeSkill
- paper-writingSkill
- pixel-artSkill
- preflight-hpcSkill
- proof-writerSkill
- research-litSkill
- research-pipelineSkill
- research-reviewSkill
- run-experimentSkill
- validate-experimentSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

