novelty-check
Skill8 starsChanged 8 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub
Verify research idea novelty against recent literature. Use when user says "查新", "novelty check", "有没有人做过", "check novelty", or wants to verify a research idea is novel before implementing.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. 10 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
10
Common
Most of the 11 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 11 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Other versions12 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 10
- wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep★ 18k25% same
- zjunlp/Mechanist★ 7565% same
- AutoResearch-Factory/Agon★ 5438% same
- Immortalqx/my_codex_skills★ 5473% same
- Chanw-research/claude-code-paper-writing★ 4290% same
- catalsqlb-cmd/Prism-H★ 1690% same
- Yulivu/debuffer-skills★ 957% same
- yvesory/academic-research-suite★ 961% same
- raja21068/AutoResearch★ 290% same
- talhaMah56/claude_skills★ 047% same
Wrote their own version · 2
- sunnnybala/Rstack★ 69same name
- lhg-plugs/lhg-patent★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use research-refine, research-refine-pipeline and 7 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
raja21068Skillresearch-refine
Turn a vague research direction into a problem-anchored, elegant, frontier-aware, implementation-oriented method plan via iterative GPT-5.4 review. Use when the user says "refine my approach", "帮我细化方案", "decompose this problem", "打磨idea", "refine research plan", "细化研究方案", or wants a concrete research method that stays simple, focused, and top-venue ready instead of a vague or overbuilt idea.
Also in 4 projects that use this
raja21068Skillresearch-refine-pipeline
Run an end-to-end workflow that chains `research-refine` and `experiment-plan`. Use when the user wants a one-shot pipeline from vague research direction to focused final proposal plus detailed experiment roadmap, or asks to "串起来", build a pipeline, do it end-to-end, or generate both the method and experiment plan together.
Also in 3 projects that use this
YuchengZhang256Skillresearch-wiki
In an existing research wiki, ingest papers, answer wiki queries, or lint compiled Markdown pages.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +6 more from raja21068
In this repository26 other files it gives its agents.
- analyze-resultsSkill
- arxivSkill
- auto-paper-improvement-loopSkill
- auto-review-loop-llmSkill
- auto-review-loop-minimaxSkill
- auto-review-loopSkill
- dse-loopSkill
- feishu-notifySkill
- idea-creatorSkill
- idea-discovery-robotSkill
- idea-discoverySkill
- idea-validationSkill
- monitor-experimentSkill
- paper-compileSkill
- paper-figureSkill
- paper-planSkill
- paper-writeSkill
- paper-writingSkill
- pixel-artSkill
- preflight-hpcSkill
- proof-writerSkill
- research-litSkill
- research-pipelineSkill
- research-reviewSkill
- run-experimentSkill
- validate-experimentSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

