agentleFS
YogirajAYogirajA/Claude-Skills/config-gc/SKILL.md

config-gc

Skill1 starsChanged 57 days agoMITView on GitHub

Garbage collection for your Claude Code configuration. Periodically scans ~/.claude (skills, memory, hooks, permissions, MCP servers, caches) for redundant, stale, orphaned, or low-value items, then walks the user through a confirm-each-deletion cleanup. Use when the user says "clean up my config", "config GC", "too many skills", "audit my setup", "my .claude is bloated", or asks for a periodic config review.

  • Commits and pushes

2 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    After installing a large skill pack (e.g.

    line 17
  2. Distinctive:

    Do NOT activate for: cleaning project source code (that's refactoring), clearing chat history, or uninstalling Claude Code itself.

    line 19
  3. Very specific:

    Forced human-in-the-loop: Every candidate gets its own [y/n/skip] confirmation.

    line 27
  4. Very specific:

    Keep a log: Every GC run appends to ~/.claude/gc_log.md: what was touched, why, and how to undo it.

    line 28
  5. Distinctive:

    Scan: all channels (or the subset the user names).

    line 45
  6. Very specific:

    Hard-deleting on first pass: If there's no _gc_trash/ copy or .disabled rename, you did it wrong.

    line 102
  7. Distinctive:

    Run after big additions, not just on a calendar: installing a 50-skill pack is exactly when overlap with existing skills appears.

    line 109
  8. Distinctive:

    When two skills overlap, prefer disabling the one with the weaker trigger description: it's the one that was probably never firing anyway.

    line 110
  9. Very specific:

    Keep gc_log.md forever. It's tiny, and "when did I disable that hook and why" comes up more often than you'd think.

    line 112

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Config GC: Garbage Collection for Claude Code Setups

Borrowed from runtime garbage collection: periodically scan for objects that are no longer referenced, redundant, expired, or low-value, and reclaim the space. The critical difference: here, collection requires a human in the loop. Never delete autonomously.

When to Activate

  • The user asks to clean up, audit, or slim down their Claude Code configuration
  • The user complains about too many skills, noisy hooks, or slow session startup
  • A monthly/periodic config review is due
  • After installing a large skill pack (e.g. this repo), to reconcile overlaps with existing setup

Do NOT activate for: cleaning project source code (that's refactoring), clearing chat history, or uninstalling Claude Code itself.

Design Philosophy

  1. Append-only configs leak. Skills, memory files, hooks, and permission entries only ever get added. Without periodic review they rot silently.
  2. Regular audits beat one-time purges. Scan every ~30 days, propose a small batch of candidates each time.
  3. Per-channel strategies. Each accumulation type (skills, hooks, permissions, ...) has its own staleness signals, don't apply one rule everywhere.
  4. Soft-delete first. Rename to .disabled > move to ~/.claude/_gc_trash/ > real deletion. Always keep an undo path.
  5. Forced human-in-the-loop. Every candidate gets its own [y/n/skip] confirmation. No "yes to all" shortcut.
  6. Keep a log. Every GC run appends to ~/.claude/gc_log.md: what was touched, why, and how to undo it.

Scan Channels

#ChannelPathStaleness / redundancy signals
1Skills~/.claude/skills/*/Heavily overlapping names; never triggered in recent transcripts; domain mismatch with the user's actual work; broken or empty SKILL.md
2Memory~/.claude/**/memory/*.md + its indexMultiple index entries for one topic; contents contradicting newer entries; dates that have passed; orphan files missing from the index; sub-100-word fragments that should merge
3Hooks~/.claude/hooks/ + settingsScripts present on disk but referenced by no hook config; old versions superseded by rewrites
4Permissionspermissions.allow in settings.json / settings.local.jsonDuplicate entries; specific entries already covered by a wildcard (e.g. Bash(git push) when Bash(*) is allowed); one-off grants from past experiments
5MCP servers~/.claude.json or project .mcp.jsonServers that fail to connect; functional duplicates; long-unused
6Scheduled reminders / jobswherever the user keeps themFired one-shots older than 30 days; jobs whose target scripts no longer exist
7Project history~/.claude/projects/*/Stale handoff snapshots; session records superseded by newer state. The remember plugin keeps its handoffs in the repo's .remember/ folder and owns their retention, so config-gc does not audit those
8Runtime cachescache/, file-history/, logs/, shell-snapshots/Sort by size and mtime; propose items >30 days old and large

Workflow

  1. Scan all channels (or the subset the user names). Collect candidates with: path, channel, signal that flagged it, size, last-modified.
  2. Rank by confidence (broken/orphaned = high; merely old = low) and present as a numbered table. Cap each run at ~20 candidates, GC is periodic, not exhaustive.
  3. Confirm one by one. For each candidate show the evidence, then ask [y/n/skip]. The user can stop at any point.
  4. Soft-delete confirmed items: prefer .disabled rename for skills/hooks and _gc_trash/<date>/ move for files. Permission entries live in JSON (no comments possible): back up the settings file, record each removed entry verbatim in gc_log.md, then remove it from the allow array with jq. Only hard-delete when the user explicitly asks.
  5. Log the run to ~/.claude/gc_log.md: timestamp, items actioned, undo instructions.
  6. Report: reclaimed size, channels still healthy, suggested next review date.

Example Scan Commands

Orphaned hook scripts (channel 3), scripts on disk that no hook config references:

for f in ~/.claude/hooks/*; do
  name=$(basename "$f")
  grep -rq "$name" ~/.claude/settings.json ~/.claude/settings.local.json 2>/dev/null \
    || echo "ORPHAN: $f"
done

Redundant permission entries (channel 4), duplicates, and specific grants shadowed by a wildcard:

jq -r '.permissions.allow[]' ~/.claude/settings.local.json | sort | uniq -d
if jq -e '.permissions.allow | index("Bash(*)")' ~/.claude/settings.local.json >/dev/null; then
  jq -r '.permissions.allow[]' ~/.claude/settings.local.json \
    | grep '^Bash(' | grep -vF 'Bash(*)'
fi

Largest stale caches (channel 8), du -k instead of GNU-only find -printf, so it works on macOS/BSD too:

find ~/.claude/file-history ~/.claude/shell-snapshots -type f -mtime +30 \
  -exec du -k {} + 2>/dev/null | sort -rn | head -20

Soft-delete with undo path (capture the date once so the log can't disagree with the directory):

gc_date=$(date +%Y-%m-%d)
mkdir -p ~/.claude/_gc_trash/$gc_date
mv ~/.claude/skills/dead-skill ~/.claude/_gc_trash/$gc_date/
echo "$(date -Iseconds) moved skills/dead-skill -> _gc_trash/$gc_date/ (undo: mv back)" >> ~/.claude/gc_log.md

Removing a confirmed-redundant permission entry (JSON has no comments, back up, log, then edit):

cp ~/.claude/settings.local.json ~/.claude/settings.local.json.bak
echo "$(date -Iseconds) removed permission entry: Bash(git push) (undo: restore from .bak or re-add)" >> ~/.claude/gc_log.md
jq '.permissions.allow -= ["Bash(git push)"]' ~/.claude/settings.local.json.bak \
  > ~/.claude/settings.local.json

Anti-Patterns

  • Bulk approval. Asking "delete all 15? [y/n]" defeats the design. One item, one decision.
  • Hard-deleting on first pass. If there's no _gc_trash/ copy or .disabled rename, you did it wrong.
  • Treating "old" as "dead". A skill untouched for 60 days may be seasonal (tax season, quarterly reviews). Age is a signal, not a verdict: that's why a human confirms.
  • Cleaning memory by truncation. Merging two contradicting memory files requires reading both and keeping the newer truth, not deleting the longer one.
  • Touching anything outside ~/.claude (or the project's .claude/). Config GC never wanders into source trees. That includes the remember plugin's .remember/ folder in the repo: it owns its own retention, so config-gc does not audit it.

Best Practices

  • Run after big additions, not just on a calendar: installing a 50-skill pack is exactly when overlap with existing skills appears.
  • When two skills overlap, prefer disabling the one with the weaker trigger description: it's the one that was probably never firing anyway.
  • Permission cleanup is the highest-value channel per minute spent: redundant allow-entries make security review harder.
  • Keep gc_log.md forever. It's tiny, and "when did I disable that hook and why" comes up more often than you'd think.

Related Skills

  • hindsight: produces the memory files this skill later audits.
  • security-review: pairs well with the permissions channel.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.