agentleFS
YepAPIYepAPI/skills/skills/financial-planning/SKILL.md

financial-planning

Skill8 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Revenue dashboards, MRR/ARR calculations, burn rate trackers, and financial projections.

Files
SKILL.md

Financial Planning

Rules

  • MRR calculation: sum of all active subscription monthly values — annual plans divided by 12, exclude one-time charges
  • ARR: MRR * 12 — display both on dashboard, use MRR for monthly trends, ARR for annual planning
  • MRR components: track new MRR, expansion MRR (upgrades), contraction MRR (downgrades), churn MRR (cancellations), reactivation MRR — display as waterfall chart
  • Burn rate: (starting cash - ending cash) / months — calculate monthly, display runway in months at current burn
  • Revenue dashboard: show MRR, ARR, MRR growth rate (MoM%), net revenue retention, total customers — update daily
  • Financial projections: model 3 scenarios (conservative, base, optimistic) — vary growth rate and churn rate, project 12-24 months
  • Currency handling: store all amounts in cents (integers) — never use floating point for money — display with Intl.NumberFormat
  • Date ranges: default to last 12 months, allow custom range — aggregate by month for trends, by day for recent activity

Dashboard Data Model

CREATE TABLE revenue_events (
  id UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT gen_random_uuid(),
  type TEXT NOT NULL, -- 'new' | 'expansion' | 'contraction' | 'churn' | 'reactivation'
  amount_cents INTEGER NOT NULL,
  customer_id UUID NOT NULL,
  occurred_at DATE NOT NULL,
  created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT NOW()
);

Aggregate MRR per month: SELECT date_trunc('month', occurred_at), type, SUM(amount_cents) FROM revenue_events GROUP BY 1, 2.

Avoid

  • Floating point for money — use integer cents everywhere
  • Counting MRR without separating components — you need to know why MRR changed
  • Monthly-only granularity — store daily events, aggregate for display
  • Ignoring contraction MRR — downgrades are early churn signals

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.