verification-loop
Skill16 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Continuous self-evaluation after code changes. Combines compile/build verification with functional smoke tests and a code quality self-check. Catches problems before the user has to report them. Triggers on \"verify\" or \"run verification loop\" or \"check this works\" or after any code change.
84 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Rojios/everything-claude-codetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lhbsaa/apex-unifiedtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ahmadvahidi/skill-atlastheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- shkodnik1917/claude-brainlabtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- pankaj-mahaur/Agent-Daemontheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- ek0212/agent-ready-repo-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use everything-claude-code, everything-claude-code-conventions and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
InfopibeSkilleverything-claude-code
Also in 10 projects that use this
mryeastcodeSkilleverything-claude-code-conventions
Development conventions and patterns for everything-claude-code. JavaScript project with conventional commits.
Also in 8 projects that use this
InfopibeSkillinvestor-materials
Create and update pitch decks, one-pagers, investor memos, accelerator applications, financial models, and fundraising materials. Use when the user needs investor-facing documents, projections, use-of-funds tables, milestone plans, or materials that must stay internally consistent across multiple fundraising assets.
Also in 25 projects that use this
niloykumarbarmanSkillagent-sort
Build an evidence-backed ECC install plan for a specific repo by sorting skills, commands, rules, hooks, and extras into DAILY vs LIBRARY buckets using parallel repo-aware review passes. Use when ECC should be trimmed to what a project actually needs instead of loading the full bundle.
Also in 8 projects that use this
tpavanipradeepSkillnextjs-turbopack
Next.js 16+ and Turbopack — incremental bundling, FS caching, dev speed, and when to use Turbopack vs webpack.
Also in 15 projects that use this
CodeWithBehnamSkilldmux-workflows
Multi-agent orchestration using dmux (tmux pane manager for AI agents). Patterns for parallel agent workflows across Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and other harnesses. Use when running multiple agent sessions in parallel or coordinating multi-agent development workflows.
Also in 17 projects that use this
- +1 more from Infopibe
Other versions84 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 84
- affaan-m/ECC★ 246ksame name
- Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar★ 5.9ksame name
- xu-xiang/everything-claude-code-zh★ 1.9ksame name
- openJiuwen-ai/agent-core★ 464same name
- loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes★ 272same name
- Resgrid/Core★ 238same name
- cloudnative-co/claude-code-starter-kit★ 153same name
- cohen-liel/hivemind★ 108same name
- MRCalderon3D/everything-game-dev-code★ 105same name
- tpavanipradeep/everything-claude-code★ 104same name
74 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository45 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- docs/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- .claude/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- actSkill
- security-checkSkill
- environment-checkSkill
- run-verificationSkill
- refactorSkill
- debug-session-archivedSkill
- generate-guardsSkill
- check-anthropicSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- debug-sessionSkill
- end-sessionSkill
- evolve-checkSkill
- evolveSkill
- fix-bugSkill
- forgetSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- guardSkill
- kit-healthSkill
- learnSkill
- map-codebaseSkill
- modeSkill
- parallel-prototypesSkill
- planSkill
- powershell-safeSkill
- product-riskSkill
- progress-reportSkill
- prototype-hypothesisSkill
- recallSkill
- refactoring-uiSkill
- scan-codebaseSkill
- scan-conventionsSkill
- search-firstSkill
- search-memorySkill
- shadow-codeSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- smart-resumeSkill
- start-sessionSkill
- strategic-compactSkill
- tourSkill
- ux-heuristicsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 78 edited versions we read keep these.
11
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 21
Run your project's build command
- Distinctive: line 22
Verify exit code 0 / no errors
- Distinctive: line 23
If build fails: fix before proceeding
- Distinctive: line 27
Call/invoke each with minimal valid inputs
- Distinctive: line 28
Verify expected output — not just "no error"
- Distinctive: line 29
Check for runtime errors in logs
- Distinctive: line 32
Verify the changed UI element renders correctly
- Distinctive: line 33
Check that no JS errors would appear in console
- Very specific: line 34
Verify no undefined values in rendered output
- Distinctive: line 51
Run this skill after every substantive code change, before reporting done
- Distinctive: line 53
Update memory/reference docs as part of verification, not as an afterthought
- Distinctive: line 54
If verification reveals a new issue, fix it before marking the task complete
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 78 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Skill: verification-loop
Trigger: "verify" or "run verification loop" or "check this works" or after any code change
Auto-triggered by: debug-session after Step 5 (fix applied). Fires automatically — user does not need to ask.
Description: Continuous self-evaluation after code changes. Combines compile/build verification with functional smoke tests and a code quality self-check. Catches problems before the user has to report them.
Allowed Tools: Bash, Read, Glob
Steps
1. Build/Compile Check
- Run your project's build command
- Verify exit code 0 / no errors
- If build fails: fix before proceeding
2. Smoke Test
- Identify which endpoint(s) or function(s) were changed
- Call/invoke each with minimal valid inputs
- Verify expected output — not just "no error"
- Check for runtime errors in logs
3. Frontend Check (if applicable)
- Verify the changed UI element renders correctly
- Check that no JS errors would appear in console
- Verify no
undefinedvalues in rendered output
4. Self-Evaluation Checklist
- Does the change do exactly what was asked — no more, no less?
- Are edge cases handled? (empty values, null, missing params)
- Does it follow the project's conventions?
- Are memory files updated? (function indexes, reference docs)
- Any new code that introduces the same pattern we just fixed elsewhere?
5. Report
- ✅ "All checks passed — [summary of what was verified]"
- ❌ "[Issue found] — [description and suggested fix]"
Notes
- Run this skill after every substantive code change, before reporting done
- "It compiled" is not the same as "it works" — always smoke test
- Update memory/reference docs as part of verification, not as an afterthought
- If verification reveals a new issue, fix it before marking the task complete
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

