implement
Skill3 starsChanged 13 days agoMITView on GitHub
执行范围明确的代码、配置或文档改动:行为改动按 tdd 先红后绿,按风险验证,完成后提交。用户请求、计划工单、Spec 或 review 发现已给出范围时使用;根因未知用 diagnose,重要取舍未定先用 brainstorm。
191 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- revisit-studies/studytheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- dz114879/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Dimon94/dveritytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Dimon94/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- The-Vibe-Company/quivrtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- miklschmidt/archboardtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use setup-ts-deep-modules, ask-matt and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
liufeng1976Skillsetup-ts-deep-modules
Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.
Also in 43 projects that use this
GoogleSkillask-matt
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Also in 91 projects that use this
RoentekSkillloop-me
Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.
Also in 50 projects that use this
AWSSkillto-questionnaire
Turn a decision you can't fully answer into a questionnaire for someone else to fill in.
Also in 88 projects that use this
ryotaroh180105Skillclaude-handoff
Hand the current conversation off to a fresh background agent that picks up the work immediately.
Also in 42 projects that use this
GoogleSkillto-spec
Turn the current conversation into a spec and publish it to the project issue tracker — no interview, just synthesis of what you've already discussed.
Also in 168 projects that use this
- +3 more from google
Other versions191 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 191
- mattpocock/skills★ 309ksame name
- QuivrHQ/quivr★ 40ksame name
- The-Vibe-Company/quivr★ 40ksame name
- foambubble/foam★ 17ksame name
- formbricks/formbricks★ 13ksame name
- ArcReel/ArcReel★ 6.3ksame name
- vinvcn/mattpocock-skills-zh-CN★ 5.5ksame name
- fallow-rs/fallow★ 5.3ksame name
- withcoral/coral★ 4.9ksame name
- bestofjs/bestofjs★ 3.1ksame name
181 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- autoresearchSkill
- brainstormSkill
- cleanupSkill
- diagnoseSkill
- find-skillsSkill
- handoffSkill
- harness-builderSkill
- planSkill
- remove-deadcode-pySkill
- researchSkill
- reviewSkill
- shipSkill
- sweepSkill
- tddSkill
- writing-for-agentsSkill
The file
Files
实现
把用户请求、计划工单、Spec 或 review 发现描述的工作做完并提交。
- 传入计划、工单或 Spec 的引用时,先读它并复述标题再动手;引用有歧义先问——做错对象的代价远大于问一句。
- 只改任务需要的部分,保护工作区里无关的改动,它们可能是用户正在进行的工作。
- 行为改动在事先商定的 seams(观察行为的公共边界)上按
tdd先红后绿,一次一片纵向切片;seams 不清楚时先和用户商定,或采用 Spec、计划里写明的验收面。文档和低风险配置不强求先写失败测试。 - typecheck 和单个测试文件常跑,全套测试收尾跑一次:短反馈能尽早发现偏差,全套只在最后证明整体没坏。验证强度按风险选,参考
references/verification-intensity.md。 - 跨模块合同、权限或数据边界、部署相关的改动,或用户要求时,完成后用
review评审;其余改动自审即可。 - 项目没有别的提交约定时,把一组已验证的改动落成一个 commit,信息用项目语言,免得已完成的工作悬在工作区里。
- 必需的验收失败或跑不了时,不宣称完成:做完独立的部分,具体说明缺口。根因未知时转
diagnose。 - 只在实质扩大范围、改变验收或碰到授权边界时停下来问。
最后报告改了什么、验证证据、遗留问题,以及是否已提交。
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

