agentleFS
Vinix24Vinix24/vnx-orchestration/.claude/terminals/T2/CLAUDE.md

vnx-orchestration / T2

CLAUDE.md63 starsChanged 9 days agoMITView on GitHub

Purpose: testing, integration, validation. For this feature, T2 is responsible for proving that headless observability signals are real, not just structurally present. This prints the skill command and full prompt. Execute those instructions as your task. Your report must always include:

The file

We split this CLAUDE.md into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Write your report to $VNX_DATA_DIR/unified_reports/ using the absolute runtime path from environment.

    line 7
  2. Very specific:

    When your first message is load-dispatch <dispatch-id>, read the dispatch bundle from disk:

    line 10
  3. Very specific:

    All shell changes must pass bash -n

    line 43
  4. Distinctive:

    Prefer exact commands over prose summaries

    line 48
  5. Distinctive:

    If CI matters, say whether you checked local-only or remote GitHub state

    line 49
  6. Distinctive:

    If path resolution or worktree behavior is relevant, test both where feasible

    line 50
  7. Distinctive:

    If closure depends on your numbers, make them independently checkable by T0

    line 51
  8. Distinctive:

    Call out explicitly when smoke, integration, certification, PTY behavior, or live-worker coverage is still missing

    line 52

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 26,980 CLAUDE.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
CLAUDE.md

T2 Worker Terminal (Track B)

Purpose: testing, integration, validation. For this feature, T2 is responsible for proving that headless observability signals are real, not just structurally present.

Startup

  1. Your dispatch arrives in this conversation. Execute only the scoped work in that dispatch.
  2. Write your report to $VNX_DATA_DIR/unified_reports/ using the absolute runtime path from environment.

load-dispatch Activation

When your first message is load-dispatch <dispatch-id>, read the dispatch bundle from disk:

python scripts/load_dispatch.py --dispatch-id <dispatch-id>

This prints the skill command and full prompt. Execute those instructions as your task.

Required Report Discipline

Your report must always include:

  • exact verification commands
  • exact test file names
  • actual pass/fail totals from what you ran
  • which run scenarios you exercised:
    • success
    • timeout
    • no-output hang
    • interrupted run
  • any CI, path, integration, or environment caveats
  • ## Open Items section, even when empty

Do NOT:

  • quote test totals you did not personally verify
  • refer to non-existent test files
  • mark integration "done" if only unit tests ran and real run-state behavior did not
  • claim merge-readiness or feature completion from local evidence alone
  • describe serialized same-terminal work as "parallel" execution

Project Rules

  • This project modifies VNX itself
  • Main CLI: bin/vnx
  • All shell changes must pass bash -n
  • Backward compatibility with existing commands is mandatory unless dispatch says otherwise

Evidence Standard

  • Prefer exact commands over prose summaries
  • If CI matters, say whether you checked local-only or remote GitHub state
  • If path resolution or worktree behavior is relevant, test both where feasible
  • If closure depends on your numbers, make them independently checkable by T0
  • Call out explicitly when smoke, integration, certification, PTY behavior, or live-worker coverage is still missing

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.