edaf-orchestration
Skill1 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub
Skill Type: Workflow Orchestration Used By: Main Agent Trigger: When user requests feature implementation with "エージェントフロー" or "EDAF" This skill provides the 7-Phase Gate System workflow for EDAF (Evaluator-Driven Agent Flow). It defines the complete workflow from requirements gathering to deployment with quality gates at each phase. Use this skill when user says: - "エージェントフローで実装して" - "EDAFで開発して" - "Use EDAF for this feature" - "Implement with agent flow"
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- .claude/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- edaf-evaluationSkill
- review-standardsSkill
- setupSkill
- ui-verificationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 5
Trigger: When user requests feature implementation with "エージェントフロー" or "EDAF"
- Distinctive: line 17
Use this skill when user says:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
EDAF Orchestration Skill
Skill Type: Workflow Orchestration Used By: Main Agent Trigger: When user requests feature implementation with "エージェントフロー" or "EDAF"
Overview
This skill provides the 7-Phase Gate System workflow for EDAF (Evaluator-Driven Agent Flow). It defines the complete workflow from requirements gathering to deployment with quality gates at each phase.
Trigger Conditions
Use this skill when user says:
- "エージェントフローで実装して"
- "EDAFで開発して"
- "Use EDAF for this feature"
- "Implement with agent flow"
Skill Contents
| File | Purpose |
SKILL.md | This overview file |
PHASE1-REQUIREMENTS.md | Phase 1: Requirements Gathering Gate workflow |
PHASE2-DESIGN.md | Phase 2: Design Gate workflow |
PHASE3-PLANNING.md | Phase 3: Planning Gate workflow |
PHASE4-IMPLEMENTATION.md | Phase 4: Implementation workflow with quality gate |
PHASE5-CODE.md | Phase 5: Code Review Gate workflow |
PHASE6-DOCUMENTATION.md | Phase 6: Documentation Update workflow |
PHASE7-DEPLOYMENT.md | Phase 7: Deployment Gate workflow (optional) |
GATE-PATTERNS.md | Common gate patterns and pass criteria |
Quick Reference
Phase Overview
Phase 1: Requirements Gathering Gate
├── Requirements Gatherer (interactive 5W2H dialogue)
└── 7 Requirements Evaluators approve (≥8.0/10.0)
↓
Phase 2: Design Gate
├── Designer creates design document
└── 7 Design Evaluators approve (≥8.0/10.0)
↓
Phase 3: Planning Gate
├── Planner creates task plan
└── 7 Planner Evaluators approve (≥8.0/10.0)
↓
Phase 4: Implementation
├── Database Worker
├── Backend Worker
├── Frontend Worker
├── Test Worker
└── Quality Gate Evaluator (Score 10.0 = PASS: lint + tests)
↓
Phase 5: Code Review Gate
├── 7 Code Evaluators approve (≥8.0/10.0)
└── UI Verification (if frontend changed)
↓
Phase 6: Documentation Update
├── Documentation Worker updates permanent docs
└── 5 Documentation Evaluators approve (≥8.0/10.0)
↓
Phase 7: Deployment Gate (Optional)
└── 5 Deployment Evaluators approve (≥8.0/10.0)Critical Rules
- NEVER skip phases
- ALWAYS launch evaluators in parallel
- WAIT for ALL evaluators to approve before proceeding
- Pass criteria:
- Phases 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7: ≥8.0/10.0
- Phase 4 Quality Gate: 10.0/10.0 (zero errors, zero warnings, all tests passing)
Phase Flow Control
Starting EDAF
// Update status
await bash('.claude/scripts/update-edaf-phase.sh "Starting" "Initializing EDAF workflow"')
// Begin Phase 1
// Reference: PHASE1-DESIGN.mdPhase Transition
// After Phase 1 passes
await bash('.claude/scripts/update-edaf-phase.sh "Phase 1" "Complete - 7/7 evaluators passed"')
// Transition to Phase 2
await bash('.claude/scripts/update-edaf-phase.sh "Phase 2" "Starting planning"')Evaluator Reference
Phase 1: Requirements Evaluators (7)
- requirements-clarity-evaluator
- requirements-completeness-evaluator
- requirements-feasibility-evaluator
- requirements-goal-alignment-evaluator
- requirements-scope-evaluator
- requirements-testability-evaluator
- requirements-user-value-evaluator
Phase 2: Design Evaluators (7)
- design-consistency-evaluator
- design-extensibility-evaluator
- design-goal-alignment-evaluator
- design-maintainability-evaluator
- design-observability-evaluator
- design-reliability-evaluator
- design-reusability-evaluator
Phase 3: Planner Evaluators (7)
- planner-clarity-evaluator
- planner-deliverable-structure-evaluator
- planner-dependency-evaluator
- planner-goal-alignment-evaluator
- planner-granularity-evaluator
- planner-responsibility-alignment-evaluator
- planner-reusability-evaluator
Phase 4: Quality Gate Evaluator (1)
- quality-gate-evaluator (checks both lint and tests, requires 10.0/10.0)
Phase 5: Code Evaluators (7)
- code-quality-evaluator-v1-self-adapting
- code-testing-evaluator-v1-self-adapting
- code-security-evaluator-v1-self-adapting
- code-documentation-evaluator-v1-self-adapting
- code-maintainability-evaluator-v1-self-adapting
- code-performance-evaluator-v1-self-adapting
- code-implementation-alignment-evaluator-v1-self-adapting
Phase 6: Documentation Evaluators (5)
- documentation-completeness-evaluator
- documentation-accuracy-evaluator
- documentation-consistency-evaluator
- documentation-clarity-evaluator
- documentation-currency-evaluator
Phase 7: Deployment Evaluators (5)
- deployment-readiness-evaluator
- production-security-evaluator
- observability-evaluator
- performance-benchmark-evaluator
- rollback-plan-evaluator
Related Resources
- Workers:
.claude/agents/workers/ - Evaluators:
.claude/agents/evaluators/ - Scoring Skill:
.claude/skills/edaf-evaluation/ - UI Verification Skill:
.claude/skills/ui-verification/
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

