agentleFS
Sign inStart free
Tsuchiya2Tsuchiya2/evaluator-driven-agent-flow/.claude/skills/edaf-evaluation/SKILL.md

edaf-evaluation

Skill1 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub

This skill provides reusable evaluation patterns and scoring frameworks for the EDAF (Evaluator-Driven Agent Flow) system. Use this skill when: - Evaluating code quality, security, performance, or maintainability - Scoring design documents or task plans - Generating evaluation reports with consistent formatting - Applying the EDAF 10-point scoring system

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill when:

    line 9

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

EDAF Evaluation Skill

Overview

This skill provides reusable evaluation patterns and scoring frameworks for the EDAF (Evaluator-Driven Agent Flow) system.

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Evaluating code quality, security, performance, or maintainability
  • Scoring design documents or task plans
  • Generating evaluation reports with consistent formatting
  • Applying the EDAF 10-point scoring system

Capabilities

  1. Scoring Framework: Consistent 10-point scale (0.0-10.0) with pass thresholds:
    • Phases 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7: ≥8.0/10.0
    • Phase 4 Quality Gate: 10.0/10.0 (zero tolerance for lint errors/warnings + all tests passing)
  2. Evaluation Patterns: Reusable criteria for different evaluation types
  3. Report Generation: Standardized markdown report templates
  4. Issue Classification: Categorization by severity (Critical, High, Medium, Low)

Files

  • SKILL.md - This overview file
  • SCORING.md - Detailed scoring criteria and rubrics
  • PATTERNS.md - Common issues and anti-patterns to check
  • REPORT-TEMPLATE.md - Standard evaluation report format

Usage Example

When evaluating code, reference:
- SCORING.md for score calculation
- PATTERNS.md for common issues
- REPORT-TEMPLATE.md for output format

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free