quiz
Skill1 starsChanged 51 days agoMITView on GitHub
Run an interactive LLM-graded retrieval quiz in the terminal over one course or a set of lessons, then update mastery, write the quiz log, and spawn targeted flashcards from every error.
14 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- TakaGoto/rag-learning-academytheir own version, first seen Oct 28, 2026
- ajitta/know-your-unknownstheir own version, first seen Oct 27, 2026
- dymchenkko/claude-study-agenttheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- ProjectAJ14/eklavyatheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- simoncorry/foundrytheir own version, first seen Oct 7, 2026
- qiao/quiztheir own version, first seen Sep 17, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use progress.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
remenoscodesSkillprogress
Longitudinal language learning progress report with metrics, trends, and insights
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions14 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 14
- maludb/learn-claude★ 51same name
- simoncorry/foundry★ 39same name
- alexiocassanifm/anthropic-certifications★ 36same name
- ProjectAJ14/eklavya★ 29same name
- TakaGoto/rag-learning-academy★ 24same name
- joyehuang/skills★ 9same name
- Aetheria-Labs1/storefront-skills★ 8same name
- ajitta/know-your-unknowns★ 2same name
- dymchenkko/claude-study-agent★ 2same name
- qiao/quiz★ 2same name
4 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 13 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 15
Default: interleaved mix across the course's status: read|quizzed|mastered lessons, weighted toward low mastery and staleness.
- Very specific: line 16
Read the scoped lessons AND their concept notes to ground questions.
- Distinctive: line 20
Before asking, privately write a 10-point rubric for the question.
- Distinctive: line 21
Ask conversationally. Mix formats per pedagogy.md: free recall, explain-why, worked problems (user answers in text/LaTeX-ish), transfer …
- Distinctive: line 22
Every 2–3 questions, ask for a confidence rating (1–5) before grading — flag high-confidence misses.
- Very specific: line 28
All rules below are defined in docs/vault-schema.md (lesson type) — apply them exactly.
- Very specific: line 31
Write the quiz log per templates/quiz-log.md at courses/<slug>/quizzes/YYYY-MM-DD Quiz <scope>.md — per-question record, weak_concepts …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 13 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/quiz [<course-slug>] [--lessons 1,3] [--weak] [--n <questions>]
Interactive retrieval practice — the core of the testing effect. Read docs/pedagogy.md (quiz rules) and docs/vault-schema.md (mastery update rule, quiz-log schema) first. Vault: <vault>.
Scope selection
--lessons: exactly those lessons of the course.--weak: lessons withmastery < 60, plus stale ones (last_quizzed> 21 days,mastery < 85).- Default: interleaved mix across the course's
status: read|quizzed|masteredlessons, weighted toward low mastery and staleness. No course given → mix across all active courses (max interleaving). - Read the scoped lessons AND their concept notes to ground questions. Default length: 6–10 questions (
--noverrides).
Session loop (one question at a time)
- Before asking, privately write a 10-point rubric for the question.
- Ask conversationally. Mix formats per pedagogy.md: free recall, explain-why, worked problems (user answers in text/LaTeX-ish), transfer questions. Never multiple choice.
- Every 2–3 questions, ask for a confidence rating (1–5) before grading — flag high-confidence misses.
- Grade /10 against the rubric with partial credit. Give elaborative feedback: correct answer, why, misconception note if relevant, link to the concept note. If the missed knowledge is encoded in the user's mind palace (grep
palace/for a link to the concept), add the location as a retrieval cue ("this lives in your palace —<room>,<spot>") — cue the place, never recite their image. Then next question. - The user can stop anytime ("stop", or the equivalent in their language) — finish the session bookkeeping with what was answered.
After the last question
All rules below are defined in docs/vault-schema.md (lesson type) — apply them exactly.
- Overall score /100 (weighted by rubric points), plus a lesson score (0–100) for each covered lesson from its own questions only.
- Write the quiz log per
templates/quiz-log.mdatcourses/<slug>/quizzes/YYYY-MM-DD Quiz <scope>.md— per-question record,weak_concepts(anything graded ≤ 5, plus high-confidence misses), and the per-lesson## Resulttable. A session spanning several courses writes one log per course. If the filename already exists, append(2),(3), … — never overwrite a log. - Update each covered lesson's frontmatter, reading
last_quizzedbefore overwriting it:mastery(first quiz, i.e.last_quizzedempty → lesson score; elseround(0.4×old + 0.6×lesson score)), thenlast_quizzed= today, thenstatus(masterediff mastery ≥ 85 and the last two lesson scores — this one and the previous quiz log's — are ≥ 80, elsequizzed; this also demotes a slippedmastered). Recompute each affected course'slessons_done. Set each involved concept note'smasteryto 10 × its most recent question grade. - For every failed item (≤ 5/10): append 1–2 new targeted cards to the relevant lesson's card file (or
concepts/Inbox Cards.md, deck#flashcards/inbox, if courseless), attacking exactly the gap. New cards have no SR comment → due immediately. Never touch existing card lines with<!--SR:comments; bumpcard_count. - Report: score, per-lesson mastery changes, cards spawned, and what
/studyshould prioritize tomorrow.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

