agentleFS
TimCodes04TimCodes04/second-brain/.claude/skills/project/SKILL.md

project

Skill1 starsChanged 51 days agoMITView on GitHub

Learn by building — scoped computational mini-projects (simulate, verify, fit, derive) grounded in recently learned material; Claude scaffolds, the user writes the part that teaches.

  • Installs packages

39 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use next, lint and 6 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • VercelSkill

    next

    Next.js renderer for json-render that turns JSON specs into full Next.js applications with routes, layouts, SSR, and metadata. Use when working with @json-render/next, building Next.js apps from JSON specs, or creating AI-generated multi-page applications.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • Microsoft AzureSkill

    lint

    Run all linting and spell checking for TypeScript and Rust code. Run this before committing to catch style issues, clippy warnings, and misspellings.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • Microsoft AzureSkill

    test

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • OpenAISkill

    audit

    Audit or critique a product flow, journey, workflow, funnel, onboarding path, checkout path, settings path, screen, or multi-step product experience by capturing screenshots first, then reporting UX, design, and accessibility findings inline from that evidence. Use Figma only when the user explicitly asks for a board. Use when the user asks to audit, review, critique, inspect, assess, analyze, evaluate, or give feedback on a product experience.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • SentrySkill

    review

    Fixture review skill.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • Hugging FaceSkill

    implement

    Make tests pass. Invoke after /write-tests produces failing tests.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • +2 more from Azure

The file

Files
SKILL.md

/project [<course-slug | lesson | topic>] [--scope 1h|3h]

Applied encoding: computing a thing cements it better than re-reading it. Read docs/pedagogy.md and docs/vault-schema.md (project schema) first. Vault: <vault>.

1. Propose

Offer 2–3 project options grounded in recently read/quizzed material, each with: the goal, what understanding it cements, estimated scope (default ~1h; --scope 3h for deeper). Favor: simulate a phenomenon from a lesson, numerically verify a formula or claim, fit a model to generated/real data, or a computational derivation check. Read Profile.md — a project that touches the user's actual work is worth proposing when the connection is genuine. The user picks or names their own.

2. Set up

Create projects/<kebab-name>/ in the vault: a project note (type: project frontmatter per vault-schema: course_slug, lessons links, status: active, summary) stating the goal, the plan, and success criteria — plus the code file(s) (python3, numpy/matplotlib; if imports fail, tell the user what to pip install rather than working around it).

3. Build — scaffold, don't solve

The division of labor is the pedagogy:

  • Agent writes: skeleton, I/O, plotting boilerplate, test harness — the plumbing.
  • User writes: the core physics/math/logic — the part that teaches. Mark it with # TODO(you): … and explain what each block must do.
  • Review their code with them: run it, interpret failures together, hint before fixing; take over a step only when they explicitly ask.

4. Wrap up

Run the final version; save figures into the project folder and embed them in the project note. Prompt the user for 3–5 "what this taught me" bullets (their words) and record them. Set status: done, link the project from the source lesson's and concepts' ## Related, and mint 0–2 cards if durable insights emerged. Unfinished is fine — status: active projects get surfaced by /study and /brief as an open thread.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.