agentleFS
TheOnlyFusionCubeTheOnlyFusionCube/potetos-for-everyone/skills/technical-writing/SKILL.md

technical-writing

Skill18 starsChanged 53 days agoMITView on GitHub

Write maintainable technical docs, RFCs, READMEs, PR descriptions, and commit messages. Use for durable engineering prose.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 116 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Put prerequisites and outcome before implementation history.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Use task-oriented sections for procedures, concept-oriented sections for mental models, and reference tables only for lookup material.

    line 9
  3. Distinctive:

    Keep terminology stable and sentences concrete.

    line 10

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 116 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Technical Writing

  1. Identify the reader and the action/decision the document should enable.
  2. Put prerequisites and outcome before implementation history.
  3. Use task-oriented sections for procedures, concept-oriented sections for mental models, and reference tables only for lookup material.
  4. Keep terminology stable and sentences concrete. Define unavoidable jargon once.
  5. Examples must be runnable or explicitly illustrative. Never fabricate commands, links, benchmarks, or compatibility claims.
  6. For change documents, include impact, design/behavior, verification, migration/rollback if relevant, and open risks.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.