agentleFS
TheOnlyFusionCubeTheOnlyFusionCube/potetos-for-everyone/skills/principle-laziness-protocol/SKILL.md

principle-laziness-protocol

Skill18 starsChanged 53 days agoMITView on GitHub

Bias toward deletion and the smallest change that fully solves the problem. Use when considering adding code, abstractions, dependencies, or speculative features.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 43 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    When considering adding code, abstractions, dependencies, or speculative features.

    line 9
  2. Distinctive:

    Prefer evidence from the current repository/runtime over generic preference.

    line 19
  3. Distinctive:

    If the principle conflicts with an explicit user constraint, keep the constraint and state the tradeoff.

    line 20

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 43 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Laziness Protocol

Trigger

When considering adding code, abstractions, dependencies, or speculative features.

Rule

Bias toward deletion and the smallest change that fully solves the problem.

Application

  1. Name the concrete decision this principle changes.
  2. Apply the rule to that decision, not as a decorative citation.
  3. Prefer evidence from the current repository/runtime over generic preference.
  4. If the principle conflicts with an explicit user constraint, keep the constraint and state the tradeoff.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.