kontext-sharing
Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Work correctly with records shared to or by the user in Kontext. Trigger when the user mentions shared access, a collaborator's project, a readOnly record, or asks what they can edit in someone else's Space. Do not trigger for ordinary owned records.
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- catch-upSkill
- kontext-contextSkill
- kontext-memorySkill
- kontext-tasksSkill
- log-decisionSkill
- recallSkill
- saveSkill
- save-skillSkill
- statusSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 16
Treat readOnly: true records as reference material only.
- Distinctive: line 29
Never move, import, archive, delete, re-share, or administer access on shared records, even when edit permission is present.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Kontext shared records
Records shared with the user arrive in normal MCP context, list, and read tools with explicit capability metadata. Nothing is copied: shared content stays in the owner's live Space.
Reading
- Shared entities carry
access.scope,readOnly,permission, andsharedByprovenance and use opaque recipient references. - Treat
readOnly: truerecords as reference material only. - Shared records are read-only at the graph boundary: they cannot be
relationship endpoints. Do not attempt
manage_context_relationshipormanage_task_relationshipon them.
Editing
- Edit a shared record only when its returned permission explicitly allows edit. Use the ordinary management tools with the opaque shared ID the tools returned — never a guessed owner-side ID.
- For an editable shared project, creating new tasks and documents inside it is allowed; those new items are owned by the current user, not the project owner.
- Never move, import, archive, delete, re-share, or administer access on shared records, even when edit permission is present.
Invitations
- Sharing invitations and revocation are managed in the Kontext Library web UI, not via MCP. If the user wants to share or unshare something, point them at https://thekontextco.ai/library.
- Incoming invitations resolve through the native sharing API to a pending state or an accepted opaque reference; the API never exposes item metadata before acceptance. Do not speculate about an invitation's contents.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

