catch-up
Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Load Kontext context for this repository or project before starting work
21 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- whyashthakker/estacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- hype-sports/hype-assistant-plugintheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- hidenobunagai/astacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- requie/endostacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- JeffreyFerreiras/ai-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- zanellig/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use in-your-own-words, bro and 2 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
drafaelSkillin-your-own-words
Restate the user's goals and the problem they are trying to solve to check understanding. Manual invocation only; use when the user explicitly invokes in-your-own-words or requests this understanding check. Do not solve the task or rewrite the assistant's last answer.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillbro
Re-explain the previous assistant message in a much simpler way, for when the reply made you go 'bro what'. Use /bro to get a simpler version of the last answer in Plain Language + Chicago Manual of Style, with diagrams where they help.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillblast-radius
Assesses network dependency and shared-infrastructure exposure. Use when the user asks which services, customers, SLA policies, routes, or redundant links are affected by a network fault.
Also in 3 projects that use this
photon-groveSkillunslop
Detects and rewrites generic, overly polished, or AI-sounding prose while preserving meaning. Use when the user asks to "unslop", humanize, de-AI, tighten, or review whether writing sounds generated.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions21 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 21
- petekp/claude-code-setup★ 48same name
- ARCASSystems/FounderOS★ 7same name
- david-vrba/claude-power-skills★ 4same name
- requie/endostack★ 4same name
- matiopala/skills★ 2same name
- chendaniely/skills★ 1same name
- hidenobunagai/astack★ 1same name
- JeffreyFerreiras/ai-skills★ 1same name
- median-labs/close-the-books★ 1same name
- Tracebrain/mcp★ 1same name
11 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- kontext-contextSkill
- kontext-memorySkill
- kontext-sharingSkill
- kontext-tasksSkill
- log-decisionSkill
- recallSkill
- saveSkill
- save-skillSkill
- statusSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 20 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 20
Call get_my_context for the snapshot of active projects, tasks, documents, and Skills.
- Very specific: line 25
Call get_timeline with scope: "project" and the project id — this is exactly the "what changed, where did I leave off" case the timeline …
- Very specific: line 28
Call list_tasks for that project to get open work.
- Distinctive: line 43
If the Space has nothing for this repository, say so in one line and offer to start a project for it.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 20 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Catch up
Rebuild the context for $ARGUMENTS — or, with no argument, for the repository in the current working directory.
Establish what "here" is. With no argument, read the repository name and recent history:
git log --oneline -10 && git status --short && git branch --show-current- Call
get_my_contextfor the snapshot of active projects, tasks, documents, and Skills. It is bounded — if its counts or truncation metadata indicate more, follow up with the list and search tools rather than briefing from a partial view. - Find the matching workstream. If one project clearly corresponds, use it. Otherwise
search_contexton the repository name and the branch or feature name. - Call
get_timelinewithscope: "project"and the project id — this is exactly the "what changed, where did I leave off" case the timeline exists for. Fall back toscope: "account"when no single project matches. - Call
list_tasksfor that project to get open work. read_documenton anything the timeline or search surfaced that looks load-bearing — a design note, a decision record, a migration plan.
Then brief the user in a few sentences:
- What this project is and where it stands.
- The open tasks, and which one the current branch appears to be about.
- Decisions or constraints from Kontext that bear on the work ahead.
- Anything in Kontext that no longer matches the code, flagged as a discrepancy rather than resolved silently.
The timeline is bounded, best-effort history. It is not an audit log and not evidence of what the user considers important — present it as "recent activity", not as priorities.
If the Space has nothing for this repository, say so in one line and offer to start a project for it. Do not create one unprompted.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

