porters-five-forces
Skill6 starsChanged 3 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Perform Porter's Five Forces analysis — competitive rivalry, supplier power, buyer power, threat of substitutes, and threat of new entrants. Use when analyzing industry dynamics, assessing competitive forces, or evaluating market attractiveness.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
10
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 66
No substitutes for supplier offerings
- Distinctive: line 81
Consider vertical integration or alternatives
- Distinctive: line 110
Create switching costs through integration
- Distinctive: line 113
Create network effects or communities
- Distinctive: line 131
No good substitutes exist
- Distinctive: line 143
Create switching costs through ecosystem or community
- Distinctive: line 175
Create switching costs and customer lock-in
- Distinctive: line 194
Create strategic initiatives aligned with force analysis
- Distinctive: line 202
No industry is universally attractive or unattractive.
- Distinctive: line 205
Use Porter's Five Forces with SWOT and PESTLE for comprehensive analysis
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Porter's Five Forces
Metadata
- Name: porters-five-forces
- Description: Perform a Porter's Five Forces analysis evaluating competitive rivalry, supplier power, buyer power, threat of substitutes, and threat of new entrants.
- Triggers: Porter's five forces, competitive forces, industry analysis, market forces, competitive dynamics
Instructions
You are a competitive strategist conducting a Porter's Five Forces analysis for $ARGUMENTS.
Your task is to evaluate the structural attractiveness of an industry and identify the competitive dynamics that will determine profitability.
Input Requirements
- Industry or market definition
- Current competitors and competitive positioning
- Supplier and customer landscape
- Potential substitutes and new entrants
- Product or service specifics
Porter's Five Forces Framework
1. Competitive Rivalry (How intense is competition?)
The degree to which companies compete directly for market share and customers.
High Rivalry When:
- Many competitors of similar size and strength
- Slow industry growth (zero-sum competition)
- Low product differentiation (commoditized)
- High fixed costs (pressure to maintain volume)
- Exit barriers are high (expensive to leave)
- Price competition is intense
- Rivals have diverse strategies and goals
- Emotional or strategic commitments keep rivals fighting
Low Rivalry When:
- Few competitors
- High growth market
- High differentiation (less price-sensitive)
- Low fixed costs
- Low switching costs for competitors
- Industry leader has clear dominance
- Rivals are cooperative or have compatible goals
Strategic Implications:
- Assess competitive positioning and differentiation
- Define defensible competitive advantages
- Monitor competitor moves and market consolidation
- Invest in differentiation or cost leadership
2. Supplier Power (How much power do suppliers have?)
The ability of suppliers to increase prices or reduce quality, affecting your profitability.
High Supplier Power When:
- Few suppliers or concentrated supplier base
- Switching costs are high (changing suppliers is expensive)
- Backward integration threat (suppliers become competitors)
- Suppliers' product is critical or unique
- Suppliers have strong bargaining position
- No substitutes for supplier offerings
- Suppliers sell to many industries (less dependent on you)
Low Supplier Power When:
- Many suppliers available
- Low switching costs
- Suppliers depend on your business
- Commodity products (interchangeable suppliers)
- Threat of forward integration (you become your own supplier)
- Available substitutes for supplier offerings
- You have significant bargaining leverage
Strategic Implications:
- Diversify supplier base to reduce dependency
- Build strong supplier relationships
- Consider vertical integration or alternatives
- Negotiate long-term contracts with favorable terms
- Invest in suppliers' success (partnerships)
3. Buyer Power (How much power do customers have?)
The ability of customers to negotiate lower prices or demand higher quality, affecting your margin.
High Buyer Power When:
- Few large customers (concentrated demand)
- Buyers switch easily and often (low switching costs)
- Backwards integration threat (customers become competitors)
- Product is undifferentiated (commoditized)
- Buyers have price sensitivity or tight budgets
- Buyers have full information about alternatives
- Customers can bypass you entirely
Low Buyer Power When:
- Many fragmented customers
- High switching costs (lock-in, integration, training)
- High product differentiation (fewer alternatives)
- Customers depend on your product
- You have strong brand or reputation
- Switching to alternatives involves risk
- Customers lack information about alternatives
Strategic Implications:
- Build strong customer relationships and loyalty
- Create switching costs through integration
- Invest in brand and differentiation
- Develop customer success programs
- Create network effects or communities
- Segment customers by willingness to pay
4. Threat of Substitutes (Are there alternative solutions?)
The risk that customers will switch to alternative products that solve the same problem.
High Threat When:
- Good substitutes exist and are easily accessible
- Substitutes have similar performance or better value
- Switching costs to substitutes are low
- Customers are willing to try alternatives
- Substitutes are improving faster than your product
- Price-to-performance of substitutes is attractive
- Substitute technology is disruptive or emerging
Low Threat When:
- No good substitutes exist
- Substitutes are more expensive or inferior
- Switching costs are high
- Your product is deeply integrated into customer workflows
- Customer preference and loyalty are strong
- Barrier to substitute entry are high
- Your product solves the problem uniquely
Strategic Implications:
- Monitor emerging substitutes and disruptive technologies
- Build customer stickiness through integration and loyalty
- Invest in product innovation and improvement
- Create switching costs through ecosystem or community
- Diversify into adjacent or complementary products
- Defend through brand, service, or convenience
5. Threat of New Entrants (Can new competitors easily enter?)
The risk that new competitors will enter the market and capture share.
High Threat When:
- Low barriers to entry (capital, expertise, licensing)
- Attractive industry margins and growth
- Incumbents are vulnerable or complacent
- Distribution or channel access is available
- Economies of scale are limited
- Network effects are weak or absent
- Regulation is permissive
- New technologies enable disruption
Low Threat When:
- High barriers to entry (capital, IP, expertise, relationships)
- Entrenched incumbents with scale advantages
- Strong network effects or switching costs
- Brand loyalty is high
- Regulatory or licensing barriers exist
- Economies of scale create cost advantage
- Control of critical resources or distribution
- Retaliation by incumbents is credible
Strategic Implications:
- Build defensible barriers (IP, brand, network effects)
- Establish cost leadership and scale advantages
- Create switching costs and customer lock-in
- Invest in brand and customer relationships
- Monitor startups and disruptors in your space
- Build alliances and control key resources
Output Process
- Assess each of the five forces (High, Medium, Low)
- Rate industry attractiveness (High rivalry + strong forces = less attractive)
- For each force, identify:
- Current state and trend (getting stronger/weaker)
- Key players or dynamics
- Implications for profitability
- Prioritize the 2-3 forces most critical to your strategy
- Develop strategic responses:
- How can we reduce threat of high-power forces?
- How can we leverage weak forces for advantage?
- Identify competitive positioning opportunities
- Create strategic initiatives aligned with force analysis
Industry Attractiveness
- Attractive: Low rivalry, weak supplier/buyer power, few substitutes, high entry barriers
- Unattractive: High rivalry, strong supplier/buyer power, many substitutes, low entry barriers
- Moderate: Mixed dynamics requiring strategic differentiation
Notes
- No industry is universally attractive or unattractive; position matters
- Same industry can be attractive for some companies, unattractive for others
- Forces change over time; re-assess as market evolves
- Use Porter's Five Forces with SWOT and PESTLE for comprehensive analysis
- Strategy should directly address the highest-force threats
Further Reading
Other versions14 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 9
- Adhamxon/claude-code-skills★ 2100% same
- skytiger6724/qwen-skills★ 2100% same
- yuusakuri/agent-skills★ 2100% same
- daviszhen/agent-skills★ 1100% same
- miovrag/claude-skills★ 1100% same
- xeroc/skills★ 1100% same
- maeng777/claude-skills★ 0100% same
- stefanomartiradonna/claude-skills★ 0100% same
- vijaysuperpositionist/skills★ 0100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills★ 7.7ksame name
- 45ck/business-analysis-skills★ 28same name
- deciqAI/knowledge-skills★ 13same name
- tupe12334/instinct★ 1same name
- CAPP-Financials/Consulting_Brain★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use customer-journey-map, brainstorm-experiments-existing and 6 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
nandanosqlSkillcustomer-journey-map
Map the complete customer experience across all touchpoints using the NNGroup framework. Identifies pain points, emotions, and opportunities at every stage of the user journey.
Also in 5 projects that use this
skytiger6724Skillbrainstorm-experiments-existing
Design experiments to test assumptions for an existing product — prototypes, A/B tests, spikes, and other low-effort validation methods. Use when validating assumptions, testing feature ideas cheaply, or planning product experiments.
Also in 3 projects that use this
skytiger6724Skillbrainstorm-ideas-new
Brainstorm feature ideas for a new product in initial discovery from PM, Designer, and Engineer perspectives. Use when starting product discovery for a new product, exploring features for a startup idea, or doing initial ideation.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +5 more from skytiger6724
In this repository281 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/founder-productivity/salim/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/investments/ada/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/investments/khalil/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/product/vercel-composition-patterns/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/product/vercel-react-best-practices/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/product/vercel-react-native-skills/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .cursor/rules/ceramic-design-system.mdcCursor rule
- agent-persona-builderSkill
- agent-prdSkill
- alignment-values-north-starSkill
- defuddleSkill
- draft-ndaSkill
- executive-onboarding-playbookSkill
- find-skillsSkill
- full-output-enforcementSkill
- grammar-checkSkill
- json-canvasSkill
- last30daysSkill
- market-segmentsSkill
- market-sizingSkill
- obsidian-basesSkill
- obsidian-cliSkill
- obsidian-markdownSkill
- pestel-analysisSkill
- prioritization-frameworksSkill
- prioritizationSkill
- privacy-policySkill
- proofSkill
- review-resumeSkill
- role-switchSkill
- salimSkill
- skillshareSkill
- stakeholder-mapSkill
- swot-analysisSkill
- tam-sam-som-calculatorSkill
- workshop-facilitationSkill
- 3-statement-modelSkill
- adaSkill
- adverse-selection-priorSkill
- auction-first-price-shadingSkill
- auction-winners-curse-haircutSkill
- audit-xlsSkill
- bayesian-reasoning-calibrationSkill
- bond-futures-basisSkill
- bond-relative-valueSkill
- capital-structure-optimizerSkill
- causal-inference-root-causeSkill
- clean-data-xlsSkill
- competitive-analysisSkill
- comps-analysisSkill
- cost-of-capital-estimatorSkill
- datapack-builderSkill
- dcf-modelSkill
- decision-matrixSkill
- deck-refreshSkill
- deliberation-debate-red-teamingSkill
- design-of-experimentsSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

