release-beta
Skill214 starsChanged 31 days agoMITView on GitHub
Create a beta pre-release for community testing with intelligent version detection. Use when creating beta releases, publishing pre-releases, or preparing versions for community testing.
- Commits and pushes
6 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- edihasaj/strolltheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- chrysb/alphaclawtheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- longbkit/clisbottheir own version, first seen Sep 29, 2026
- patterson-agents/skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 12, 2026
- getpaseo/paseotheir own version, first seen Aug 8, 2026
- ChisaAlter/ChisaCodetheir own version, first seen May 31, 2026
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 6
- getpaseo/paseo★ 23ksame name
- chrysb/alphaclaw★ 1.5ksame name
- longbkit/clisbot★ 131same name
- ChisaAlter/ChisaCode★ 4same name
- edihasaj/stroll★ 1same name
- patterson-agents/skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .aidriven/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- debugSkill
- implementSkill
- release-checkSkill
- release-rollbackSkill
- release-stableSkill
- reviewSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Create a BETA pre-release for community testing.
- Very specific: line 20
All scripts (bump-version.sh, create-prerelease.sh) already create tags without 'v'.
- Distinctive: line 21
Never create tags manually: - always use the scripts.
- Very specific: line 41
Run commit analysis: npm run analyze:commits
- Very specific: line 70
Only bug fixes (fix: commits)
- Distinctive: line 86
Commit breakdown (feat, fix, breaking, etc.)
- Distinctive: line 104
Remove noise (version bumps, merges, CI commits, deps updates)
- Very specific: line 206
Every release logged to: .opencode/logs/release-beta-{timestamp}.log
- Distinctive: line 246
All validations are blocking (must pass)
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Create Beta Pre-Release
Create a BETA pre-release for community testing.
Current version: Check package.json for current version.
⚠️ CRITICAL TAG FORMAT RULE
NEVER use 'v' prefix in git tags!
- ✅ CORRECT:
1.4.1-beta.1 - ❌ WRONG:
v1.4.1-beta.1
The GitHub workflows expect tags WITHOUT 'v' prefix. Using 'v' will cause workflow failures.
All scripts (bump-version.sh, create-prerelease.sh) already create tags without 'v'.
Never create tags manually - always use the scripts.
Intelligent Workflow
The workflow adapts automatically based on the current version:
First beta after stable release → AI analyzes commits and suggests version type (patch/minor/major) Incremental beta (beta.2 → beta.3) → Automatically increments without user validation
Phase 1: Version Detection & Analysis
Automatically detect release type:
- Detect release type:
- Current version:
1.4.0→ First beta (requires AI analysis) - Current version:
1.4.0-beta.2→ Incremental beta (auto-increment to beta.3)
- Current version:
- For first beta after stable:
- Run commit analysis:
npm run analyze:commits - Analyze commit types (feat, fix, BREAKING CHANGE)
- Count semantic changes
- Determine version bump type (patch/minor/major)
- Run commit analysis:
- For incremental beta:
- Skip analysis (already determined)
- Auto-increment beta counter
Phase 2: Version Type Decision (First Beta Only)
AI Semantic Analysis Rules:
MAJOR (X.0.0):
- Commits contain
BREAKING CHANGE:in footer - Commits use
!after type (e.g.,feat!:,fix!:) - API incompatible changes detected
- Database schema changes
- Major architecture refactoring
MINOR (X.Y.0):
- New features detected (
feat:commits) - Backward-compatible additions
- New components, views, cards
- Significant enhancements
PATCH (X.Y.Z):
- Only bug fixes (
fix:commits) - Documentation updates (
docs:) - Small improvements/refactoring
- Translation updates
- Dependency updates
AMBIGUOUS:
- Mixed signals (e.g., 5 feat + 1 BREAKING)
- Unclear impact
- → Ask user to decide manually
Present Validation Prompt:
Present detailed analysis with:
- Current version
- Proposed version
- Commit breakdown (feat, fix, breaking, etc.)
- AI reasoning with confidence level
- Key commits (most impactful)
- User decision options:
- [1] APPROVE - Proceed with AI suggestion
- [2] DOWNGRADE TO PATCH - Override AI
- [3] UPGRADE TO MAJOR - Override AI
- [4] VIEW COMMITS - Show full commit list
- [5] CANCEL - Abort safely
Phase 3: Release Notes Generation & Editing
Automatically:
- Generate release notes (
bash scripts/generate-release-notes.sh) - AI-powered editing:
- Remove noise (version bumps, merges, CI commits, deps updates)
- Enhance features/fixes (bold title + detailed description)
- Translate to French (same detail level)
- Fill beta testing instructions
- Remove TODO markers
- Format for GitHub (
bash scripts/format-release-notes.sh)
Phase 4: Quality Validation (BLOCKING)
All must pass:
A. Release notes validation (scripts/validate-release-notes.sh)
- Required sections EN/FR
- No TODO
- Beta testing filled
- Bold features
B. Code quality (17 checks) (scripts/check-release-ready.sh)
- Git clean 2. Branch main 3. Up-to-date 4. Deps installed 5. Lint 6. Type-check 7. Build 8. Version consistency 9. No FIXME 10. CHANGELOG 11. manifest.json 12. hacs.json 13. No secrets 14. Python syntax 15. README 16. LICENSE 17. Smoke tests ready
C. Smoke tests (15 tests) (npm run test:smoke)
Phase 5: Final Approval & Publication
Present final approval with:
- Version and bump type
- Changes summary (features, bug fixes)
- Beta testing checklist
- Validation results
- What happens if approved
User options:
- [1] APPROVE - Publish beta release
- [2] REQUEST CHANGES - Modify release notes
- [3] VIEW FULL NOTES - See complete file
- [4] CANCEL - Abort
Phase 6: Publication (Only after approval)
For first beta with explicit version type:
- Bump version (
bash scripts/bump-version.sh beta <patch|minor|major>)- Example:
bash scripts/bump-version.sh beta minor→ 1.5.0-beta.1
- Example:
- Update release notes with final version
- Commit + tag (
git commit+git tag) - Push (
git push && git push --tags) - Report success with monitoring links
For incremental beta:
- Bump version (
bash scripts/bump-version.sh beta)- Auto-increment: 1.5.0-beta.2 → 1.5.0-beta.3
- Update release notes with final version
- Commit + tag (
git commit+git tag) - Push (
git push && git push --tags) - Report success with monitoring links
GitHub Actions automatically:
- Builds project
- Runs smoke tests
- Creates ZIP
- Creates pre-release
- Sends Discord notification to @Beta Tester
- Cleans up RELEASE_NOTES.md
Quality Standards
Release notes: EN+FR equal quality, no TODO, detailed explanations, specific beta testing, user-focused, clean
Code: 17 checks passed, 15 smoke tests passed, lint+type-check passed, build succeeded
Version decision: AI analyzes commits semantically, presents detailed justification, user validates when needed
Options
Dry Run
--dry-runRuns everything, creates commit+tag locally, STOPS before push. Nothing published.
To undo: git reset HEAD~1 && git tag -d X.Y.Z-beta.N
Skip Approval (Final approval only)
--skip-approvalShows summary but auto-approves final publication. Still requires version decision validation if first beta. ⚠️ Use with caution.
Logs
Every release logged to: .opencode/logs/release-beta-{timestamp}.log
Contains: timestamps, commit analysis, AI reasoning, user decisions, git hashes, URLs, duration
Common Errors
Validation fails → Fix issues, re-run command
Smoke tests fail → Check npm run test:smoke, fix, re-run
Build fails → Run npm run build, fix errors, re-run
Push fails → git pull --rebase, re-run
Tag exists → git tag -d X.Y.Z-beta.N or re-run (auto-increments)
Ambiguous commits → AI asks you to decide manually between patch/minor/major
Related Commands
After beta testing:
- ✅ Beta successful → Use release-stable skill (finalizes beta → stable)
- 🐛 Issues found → Fix, then use release-beta skill again (increments beta.N automatically)
- 🚨 Critical issue → Use release-rollback skill
Version Detection Logic Summary
| Current Version | Detection | AI Analysis | User Validation | Result |
1.4.0 (stable) | First beta | ✅ Yes | ✅ Required | 1.5.0-beta.1 (if MINOR) |
1.4.0-beta.2 | Incremental | ❌ No | ❌ Not required | 1.4.0-beta.3 |
1.4.0-beta.5 | Incremental | ❌ No | ❌ Not required | 1.4.0-beta.6 |
Important
- First beta: AI analyzes commits, presents detailed reasoning, requires your validation
- Incremental beta: Automatic increment, no analysis, faster workflow
- All validations are blocking (must pass)
- Idempotent (safe to re-run)
- Logs everything
- Time: 5-10 min (first beta) or 3-5 min (incremental)
Scripts Used:
scripts/analyze-commits.sh- Commit analysis (first beta only)scripts/bump-version.sh beta [patch|minor|major]- Version bumpingscripts/generate-release-notes.sh- Release notes generationscripts/format-release-notes.sh- Formattingscripts/validate-release-notes.sh- Validationscripts/check-release-ready.sh- Code quality checks
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

