systematic-feature-builder
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Systematic approach to implementing features with detailed planning, tracking, and testing. Use when building new features, adding functionality to existing projects, implementing multi-step requirements, or when user requests organized, methodical development workflow. Apply automatically when the request matches; the user does not need to mention this skill.
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- EvezArt/evez-skillsedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- EvezArt/evez-skills★ 399% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository76 other files it gives its agents.
- app-store-submission-packagerSkill
- digital-product-inventorSkill
- ios-testflight-github-actionsSkill
- meta-ads-analyzerSkill
- get-to-know-a-clientSkill
- investigate-before-recommendSkill
- production-system-auditSkill
- similarweb-analyticsSkill
- stock-analysisSkill
- system-architectSkill
- autonomous-github-syncSkill
- autonomous-sync-scriptSkill
- github-gem-seekerSkill
- organize-github-reposSkill
- using-git-worktreesSkill
- brainstorm-logosSkill
- brand-driven-ux-overhaulSkill
- canvas-designSkill
- excel-generatorSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- inspirational-music-video-productionSkill
- theme-factorySkill
- video-generatorSkill
- multiplayer-game-builderSkill
- promo-code-systemSkill
- realistic-ai-persona-builderSkill
- role-based-access-controlSkill
- serverless-debuggingSkill
- vertical-expansion-blueprintSkill
- manus-mcp-configuratorSkill
- mcp-auto-recoverySkill
- mcp-builderSkill
- mcp-connector-testerSkill
- mcp-ecosystem-optimizerSkill
- voice-ai-integrationSkill
- api-endpoint-builderSkill
- database-schema-generatorSkill
- testing-frameworkSkill
- deployment-automationSkill
- error-monitoring-setupSkill
- github-workflow-automationSkill
- analytics-dashboardSkill
- email-system-builderSkill
- feature-flag-systemSkill
- user-authentication-systemSkill
- cron-job-schedulerSkill
- file-upload-systemSkill
- notification-systemSkill
- payment-integrationSkill
- search-implementationSkill
- debug-mining-engineSkill
- doc-coauthoringSkill
- docxSkill
- internet-skill-finderSkill
- pdfSkill
- pptxSkill
- project-handoff-ingestionSkill
- serverless-debuggingSkill
- skill-arsenal-builderSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
26 rules. About 0 are common, 23 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈23
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Use this skill when the request matches its description.
- Distinctive: line 23
Use this skill when:
- Distinctive: line 33
Follow these five phases in order:
- Distinctive: line 36
Implementation Planning: - Create detailed, step-by-step plan
- Distinctive: line 39
Documentation & Checkpoint: - Create comprehensive checkpoint
- Distinctive: line 61
Ask targeted questions if requirements are unclear:
- Distinctive: line 71
Use the implementation plan template:
- Distinctive: line 118
Add all planned tasks to project's todo.md:
- Very specific: line 156
Use file tool's edit action to update checkboxes efficiently.
- Distinctive: line 160
If you deviate from the plan:
- Distinctive: line 161
Document why in the plan file
- Distinctive: line 162
Update todo.md with new tasks
- Distinctive: line 176
Test at all three levels before checkpoint:
- Distinctive: line 215
Before creating checkpoint, verify all tasks complete:
- Distinctive: line 228
Ensure documentation reflects changes:
- Distinctive: line 229
Update README if user-facing features added
- Distinctive: line 230
Add inline code comments for complex logic
- Distinctive: line 231
Update API documentation if endpoints changed
- Very specific: line 235
Follow checkpoint guidelines in references/checkpoint-guidelines.md.
- Distinctive: line 270
Before creating webdev checkpoint:
- Distinctive: line 283
Always follow this sequence:
- Very specific: line 286
Run pnpm db:push to apply migration
- Distinctive: line 292
Create files in this order:
- Distinctive: line 337
Test → Verify fix + no regressions
- Distinctive: line 420
Update todo.md after each task
- Distinctive: line 421
Test each component independently
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Overview
Systematic approach to implementing features with detailed planning, tracking, and testing. Use when building new features, adding functionality to existing projects, implementing multi-step requirements, or when user requests organized, methodical development workflow. Apply automatically when the request matches; the user does not need to mention this skill.
This skill should apply automatically when the request matches; the user does not need to mention this skill.
Usage
Use this skill when the request matches its description. The skill is discovered automatically; the user does not need to mention the skill explicitly.
Systematic Feature Builder
Implement features systematically with detailed planning, progress tracking, and comprehensive testing.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Building new features from requirements or specifications
- Adding functionality to existing projects
- Implementing multi-step features that require coordination
- User requests "systematic", "organized", or "methodical" approach
- User provides a spec or detailed requirements document
- Features require database changes, API integration, or complex logic
Core Workflow
Follow these five phases in order:
- Requirements Analysis - Understand what needs to be built
- Implementation Planning - Create detailed, step-by-step plan
- Systematic Implementation - Execute plan with progress tracking
- Testing & Verification - Validate at multiple levels
- Documentation & Checkpoint - Create comprehensive checkpoint
Phase 1: Requirements Analysis
Gather Information
Extract clear requirements from user input:
- What features need to be built?
- What is the expected behavior?
- Are there existing examples or references?
- What are the success criteria?
Identify Dependencies
Determine what exists and what needs to be created:
- Existing code/components that can be reused
- Database schema changes required
- External services or APIs needed
- Dependencies between features
Clarify Ambiguities
Ask targeted questions if requirements are unclear:
- Edge cases and error handling
- User permissions and access control
- Performance or scalability requirements
- UI/UX preferences
Phase 2: Implementation Planning
Create Detailed Plan
Use the implementation plan template:
# Copy template to project
cp /home/ubuntu/skills/systematic-feature-builder/templates/implementation-plan-template.md \
<project-path>/docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-feature-name.mdPlan Structure:
- Overview and objectives
- Task breakdown with estimated time
- Step-by-step instructions with file paths
- Testing strategy for each task
- Success criteria
- Rollback plan
Break Down Into Atomic Tasks
Each task should:
- Be completable in one sitting (30-90 minutes)
- Have clear inputs and outputs
- Be independently testable
- Have explicit success criteria
Example Task Breakdown:
### Task 1: Add Database Field (15 min)
1. Update schema.ts with new field
2. Run `pnpm db:push` to migrate
3. Verify field exists in database
### Task 2: Create Backend Endpoint (30 min)
1. Add endpoint to router
2. Implement business logic
3. Add input validation
4. Write unit tests
### Task 3: Build Frontend Component (45 min)
1. Create component file
2. Add tRPC integration
3. Implement UI with shadcn/ui
4. Handle loading/error statesUpdate todo.md
Add all planned tasks to project's todo.md:
## [Feature Name]
- [ ] Task 1: Database changes
- [ ] Task 2: Backend endpoint
- [ ] Task 3: Frontend component
- [ ] Task 4: Testing
- [ ] Task 5: DocumentationPhase 3: Systematic Implementation
Execute Plan Sequentially
Implement tasks in order, following the plan:
- Start with backend/data layer (database, APIs)
- Then business logic (endpoints, services)
- Finally UI layer (components, pages)
This order minimizes rework and allows incremental testing.
Track Progress in todo.md
Mark tasks complete as you finish them:
## [Feature Name]
- [x] Task 1: Database changes
- [x] Task 2: Backend endpoint
- [ ] Task 3: Frontend component ← Currently working on this
- [ ] Task 4: Testing
- [ ] Task 5: DocumentationUse file tool's edit action to update checkboxes efficiently.
Handle Deviations
If you deviate from the plan:
- Document why in the plan file
- Update todo.md with new tasks
- Adjust time estimates if needed
Communicate Progress
For long implementations, send info messages at milestones:
- "✅ Task 1 complete: Database schema updated"
- "📊 Progress: 3/5 tasks complete"
- "⚠️ Encountered issue with X, implementing alternative approach"
Phase 4: Testing & Verification
Three-Level Testing
Test at all three levels before checkpoint:
1. Unit Tests
- Individual functions and endpoints
- Database operations
- Input validation
2. Integration Tests
- Features working together
- End-to-end workflows
- External service integration
3. Manual Verification
- UI renders correctly
- User flows work as expected
- Edge cases handled gracefully
Webdev-Specific Testing
For webdev projects:
# Run automated tests
pnpm test
# Check dev server health
# (use webdev_check_status tool)
# Manual browser testing
# - Open dev server URL
# - Test feature in browser
# - Check console for errors
# - Verify responsive designRefer to references/testing-strategies.md for detailed testing approaches.
Verify Completion
Before creating checkpoint, verify all tasks complete:
python /home/ubuntu/skills/systematic-feature-builder/scripts/verify_completion.py \
<project-path>/todo.mdThis script checks for incomplete [ ] items and reports them.
Phase 5: Documentation & Checkpoint
Update Documentation
Ensure documentation reflects changes:
- Update README if user-facing features added
- Add inline code comments for complex logic
- Update API documentation if endpoints changed
Create Comprehensive Checkpoint
Follow checkpoint guidelines in references/checkpoint-guidelines.md.
Checkpoint Description Template:
[Feature name]: [brief summary]
## Features Added
### 1. [Feature Name]
- Key capability 1
- Key capability 2
- Location/integration point
## Technical Details
**Database Changes:**
- [Schema changes]
**New Files:**
- [Important new files and their purpose]
**Dependencies:**
- [New packages added]
## Testing
- [X] tests passing
- [Y] tests failing (if any, explain why)
## Next Steps
- [Suggested follow-up actions]Webdev Checkpoint Checklist
Before creating webdev checkpoint:
- All tests passing (or failures documented)
webdev_check_statusshows no critical errors- Feature works in dev server
- todo.md updated with completed items marked
[x] - Large media files uploaded to S3 (not in project directory)
- Database migrations applied successfully
Webdev-Specific Guidance
Database Changes
Always follow this sequence:
- Edit
drizzle/schema.ts - Run
pnpm db:pushto apply migration - Verify migration succeeded
- Test database operations
File Organization
Create files in this order:
- Database layer:
drizzle/schema.ts - Data access:
server/db.ts(query helpers) - Business logic:
server/*-router.ts(tRPC endpoints) - Frontend:
client/src/components/*.tsx,client/src/pages/*.tsx
Testing Pattern
// server/feature.test.ts
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest';
describe('Feature Tests', () => {
it('should handle valid input', async () => {
// Arrange
const input = { /* test data */ };
// Act
const result = await endpoint(input);
// Assert
expect(result).toMatchObject({ expected });
});
it('should handle error cases', async () => {
// Test error scenarios
});
});Common Patterns
Adding a Feature:
- Plan → Update todo.md
- Schema → Database migration
- Backend → tRPC endpoint + tests
- Frontend → Component + integration
- Test → Manual verification
- Checkpoint → Comprehensive description
Fixing a Bug:
- Reproduce → Document steps
- Identify → Root cause analysis
- Fix → Minimal change
- Test → Verify fix + no regressions
- Checkpoint → Explain bug and fix
Best Practices
Do
✅ Write plans before coding - Saves time, reduces rework
✅ Update todo.md actively - Provides clear progress tracking
✅ Test incrementally - Catch issues early
✅ Document decisions - Future you will thank present you
✅ Create detailed checkpoints - Enable easy rollback and review
Don't
❌ Skip planning - Leads to disorganized implementation
❌ Implement everything at once - Hard to debug, test, and review
❌ Forget to update todo.md - Loses track of progress
❌ Skip testing - Bugs slip into production
❌ Create vague checkpoints - Useless for rollback or review
Templates and Scripts
Available Resources
Templates (templates/):
implementation-plan-template.md- Structured feature plantodo-template.md- Format for tracking features
Scripts (scripts/):
verify_completion.py- Validates all checklist items complete
References (references/):
testing-strategies.md- Testing approaches by project typecheckpoint-guidelines.md- Checkpoint best practices
Using Templates
Copy templates to your project:
# Implementation plan
cp /home/ubuntu/skills/systematic-feature-builder/templates/implementation-plan-template.md \
<project>/docs/plans/$(date +%Y-%m-%d)-feature-name.md
# Todo file (if project doesn't have one)
cp /home/ubuntu/skills/systematic-feature-builder/templates/todo-template.md \
<project>/todo.mdExamples
Example: Adding Bulk CSV Import Feature
Phase 1: Requirements
- Admin needs to import rep codes from CSV
- CSV format: email, repCode
- Show import results with errors
Phase 2: Plan
### Task 1: Backend Endpoint (30 min)
1. Add bulkImportRepCodes to admin-router.ts
2. Parse CSV data from input
3. Validate each row
4. Update database
5. Return results with errors
### Task 2: Frontend Component (45 min)
1. Create BulkRepCodeImport.tsx
2. Add file upload input
3. Integrate Papa Parse
4. Show import results
5. Add CSV template download
### Task 3: Integration (15 min)
1. Add component to Admin page
2. Test with sample CSV
3. Verify error handlingPhase 3: Implementation
- Implement tasks sequentially
- Update todo.md after each task
- Test each component independently
Phase 4: Testing
- Unit test: endpoint validates CSV correctly
- Integration test: upload CSV via UI
- Manual test: download template, upload, verify results
Phase 5: Checkpoint
Title: Add bulk rep code CSV import
## Features Added
- Admin endpoint for bulk importing rep codes
- BulkRepCodeImport component with file upload
- Papa Parse integration
- Detailed error reporting
## Technical Details
**New Files:**
- server/admin-router.ts: bulkImportRepCodes endpoint
- client/src/components/BulkRepCodeImport.tsx
**Dependencies:**
- papaparse, @types/papaparse
## Testing
- 52 tests passingTroubleshooting
"Plan is too detailed/taking too long" → Reduce granularity. Focus on major steps, not every line of code.
"Implementation deviating from plan" → Update plan document with deviations and reasoning. Adjust todo.md.
"Tests failing after implementation" → Fix tests before checkpoint. Document any intentional test changes.
"Checkpoint description too long" → Focus on what changed and why. Move detailed technical notes to plan document.
Summary
This skill provides a systematic, organized approach to feature implementation:
- Analyze requirements thoroughly
- Plan implementation with detailed steps
- Implement systematically with progress tracking
- Test at multiple levels
- Document comprehensively in checkpoint
The result: high-quality, well-tested features with clear documentation and easy rollback capability.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

