production-system-audit
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Comprehensive system audit methodology for production web applications. Use when auditing systems before launch, identifying technical debt, troubleshooting systematic issues, preparing for security reviews, or creating improvement roadmaps. Systematically audits database schema, API endpoints, external integrations, performance, security, and monitoring across all layers. Apply automatically when the request matches; the user does not need to mention this skill.
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- EvezArt/evez-skillsedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- EvezArt/evez-skills★ 399% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository76 other files it gives its agents.
- app-store-submission-packagerSkill
- digital-product-inventorSkill
- ios-testflight-github-actionsSkill
- meta-ads-analyzerSkill
- get-to-know-a-clientSkill
- investigate-before-recommendSkill
- similarweb-analyticsSkill
- stock-analysisSkill
- system-architectSkill
- autonomous-github-syncSkill
- autonomous-sync-scriptSkill
- github-gem-seekerSkill
- organize-github-reposSkill
- using-git-worktreesSkill
- brainstorm-logosSkill
- brand-driven-ux-overhaulSkill
- canvas-designSkill
- excel-generatorSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- inspirational-music-video-productionSkill
- theme-factorySkill
- video-generatorSkill
- multiplayer-game-builderSkill
- promo-code-systemSkill
- realistic-ai-persona-builderSkill
- role-based-access-controlSkill
- serverless-debuggingSkill
- vertical-expansion-blueprintSkill
- manus-mcp-configuratorSkill
- mcp-auto-recoverySkill
- mcp-builderSkill
- mcp-connector-testerSkill
- mcp-ecosystem-optimizerSkill
- voice-ai-integrationSkill
- api-endpoint-builderSkill
- database-schema-generatorSkill
- testing-frameworkSkill
- deployment-automationSkill
- error-monitoring-setupSkill
- github-workflow-automationSkill
- analytics-dashboardSkill
- email-system-builderSkill
- feature-flag-systemSkill
- user-authentication-systemSkill
- cron-job-schedulerSkill
- file-upload-systemSkill
- notification-systemSkill
- payment-integrationSkill
- search-implementationSkill
- debug-mining-engineSkill
- doc-coauthoringSkill
- docxSkill
- internet-skill-finderSkill
- pdfSkill
- pptxSkill
- project-handoff-ingestionSkill
- serverless-debuggingSkill
- skill-arsenal-builderSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- skill-demo-builderSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
18 rules. About 0 are common, 15 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈15
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Use this skill when the request matches its description.
- Distinctive: line 35
Actionable recommendations: Every finding includes specific fix guidance, not just problem description.
- Very specific: line 47
Read /home/ubuntu/skills/production-system-audit/references/database-audit-checklist.md and systematically check:
- Distinctive: line 69
Output: Document all findings with severity, impact, examples, and recommendations.
- Very specific: line 77
Read /home/ubuntu/skills/production-system-audit/references/integration-audit-checklist.md and check each integration:
- Distinctive: line 98
Output: Document integration-specific issues with recommendations.
- Distinctive: line 140
Check for missing logging:
- Distinctive: line 173
Check for missing validation:
- Distinctive: line 182
Check for XSS and injection risks:
- Distinctive: line 186
No eval() or dangerous functions
- Distinctive: line 190
Check for security gaps:
- Very specific: line 205
Use the template at /home/ubuntu/skills/production-system-audit/templates/audit-report-template.md.
- Distinctive: line 227
Document common failure scenarios with:
- Distinctive: line 237
Use consistent severity levels across all findings:
- Distinctive: line 257
Use checklists systematically: Don't skip items—systematic coverage catches hidden issues.
- Distinctive: line 259
Provide examples: Every finding should include code snippet or scenario showing the problem.
- Distinctive: line 263
Test your findings: Verify issues exist before documenting (run queries, test endpoints).
- Distinctive: line 275
Don't assume test coverage: Verify tests exist and pass for critical paths.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Overview
Comprehensive system audit methodology for production web applications. Use when auditing systems before launch, identifying technical debt, troubleshooting systematic issues, preparing for security reviews, or creating improvement roadmaps. Systematically audits database schema, API endpoints, external integrations, performance, security, and monitoring across all layers. Apply automatically when the request matches; the user does not need to mention this skill.
This skill should apply automatically when the request matches; the user does not need to mention this skill.
Usage
Use this skill when the request matches its description. The skill is discovered automatically; the user does not need to mention the skill explicitly.
Production System Audit
Systematically audit production systems to identify weaknesses, single points of failure, and troubleshooting spots before they become problems.
When to Use This Skill
- Pre-production launch - Audit before going live to catch issues early
- Technical debt assessment - Identify accumulated issues in existing systems
- Systematic troubleshooting - Debug issues that span multiple layers
- Security review preparation - Comprehensive security and reliability audit
- Scaling preparation - Identify bottlenecks before traffic increases
Core Principles
Systematic, not symptomatic: Audit all layers methodically, don't just fix visible bugs.
Severity-based prioritization: Categorize findings as Critical/High/Medium/Low to guide action.
Actionable recommendations: Every finding includes specific fix guidance, not just problem description.
Comprehensive coverage: Database → APIs → Integrations → Performance → Security → Monitoring.
Audit Workflow
Phase 1: Architecture Audit
Audit the foundational layers: database schema, API endpoints, and core architecture.
1.1 Database Schema Audit
Read /home/ubuntu/skills/production-system-audit/references/database-audit-checklist.md and systematically check:
- Foreign key constraints and referential integrity
- Indexes on foreign keys and common query patterns
- Unique constraints on natural keys
- Data types, lengths, and NOT NULL constraints
- Timestamps and audit trails
- JSON column usage
- Enum definitions
- Cascading deletes and orphaned record prevention
1.2 API Endpoint Audit
Read /home/ubuntu/skills/production-system-audit/references/api-audit-checklist.md and systematically check:
- Input validation (Zod schemas, range checks, format validation)
- Error handling (TRPCError usage, appropriate codes, descriptive messages)
- Authentication and authorization (procedure types, ownership checks)
- Rate limiting on expensive operations
- Pagination on list endpoints
- Data sanitization
- Transaction handling
- Response size limits
Output: Document all findings with severity, impact, examples, and recommendations.
Phase 2: Integration Audit
Audit external service integrations for reliability and security.
Read /home/ubuntu/skills/production-system-audit/references/integration-audit-checklist.md and check each integration:
Common Integrations to Audit:
- AI services (Hume AI, OpenAI, etc.)
- Communication services (Twilio, SendGrid, etc.)
- Storage services (S3, Cloudinary, etc.)
- Database services (Supabase, PlanetScale, etc.)
- Payment services (Stripe, PayPal, etc.)
For each integration, check:
- Error handling and retry logic
- Timeout configuration
- API key and credential management
- Webhook security (signature verification)
- Resource cleanup (no unbounded accumulation)
- Rate limit handling
- Data validation from external sources
- Webhook reliability (async processing, idempotency)
- Connection pooling
- Service health monitoring
Output: Document integration-specific issues with recommendations.
Phase 3: Performance & Scalability Audit
Identify performance bottlenecks and scalability issues.
3.1 Database Query Performance
Identify slow queries:
- Full table scans without indexes
- N+1 query problems
- Missing composite indexes for common filters
- Inefficient JOIN operations
- Unbounded result sets
3.2 API Response Times
Measure baseline performance:
- Average response times for critical endpoints
- Slow endpoints (>500ms)
- Endpoints without caching that should have it
3.3 Concurrent Usage
Identify untested scenarios:
- Multiple users creating resources simultaneously
- Race conditions in status updates
- Concurrent access to shared resources
- Load testing gaps
Output: List performance bottlenecks with optimization recommendations.
Phase 4: Monitoring & Observability Audit
Identify gaps in logging, error tracking, and health checks.
4.1 Logging Gaps
Check for missing logging:
- External API call success/failure rates
- File upload/download operations
- User action tracking
- Performance metrics (response times, query times)
- Security events (login attempts, permission denials)
4.2 Error Tracking
Assess current error tracking:
- Centralized error tracking (Sentry, etc.)
- Error aggregation and alerting
- Error rate monitoring
- Stack trace capture
4.3 Health Checks
Identify missing health checks:
- Database connection health
- External service availability (Hume AI, Twilio, S3, etc.)
- Disk space, memory usage
/api/healthendpoint with dependency checks
Output: Monitoring and observability improvement plan.
Phase 5: Security Audit
Identify security vulnerabilities and compliance gaps.
5.1 Input Validation
Check for missing validation:
- Phone number formats
- Email formats
- Code/identifier formats
- File upload types and sizes
- User-provided content sanitization
5.2 Data Sanitization
Check for XSS and injection risks:
- User-provided content displayed as HTML
- Script content not sanitized
- SQL injection prevention (parameterized queries)
- No eval() or dangerous functions
5.3 API Security
Check for security gaps:
- Rate limiting on all endpoints
- Request size limits
- Webhook signature verification
- HTTPS enforcement
- CORS configuration
Output: Security findings with remediation steps.
Deliverables
1. Comprehensive Audit Report
Use the template at /home/ubuntu/skills/production-system-audit/templates/audit-report-template.md.
Structure:
- Executive Summary (overall health, issue counts)
- Phase 1: Architecture Audit (database, APIs)
- Phase 2: Integration Audit (external services)
- Phase 3: Performance & Scalability
- Phase 4: Monitoring & Observability
- Phase 5: Security Audit
- Summary of Findings (categorized by severity)
- Recommended Action Plan (4-week roadmap)
- Troubleshooting Guide (common failure scenarios)
2. Prioritized Improvement Roadmap
Week 1: Critical and high-priority issues
Week 2: Medium-priority issues (performance, monitoring)
Week 3: Medium-priority issues (security, reliability)
Week 4: Low-priority issues (nice-to-haves, cleanup)
3. Troubleshooting Guide
Document common failure scenarios with:
- Symptoms (what user sees)
- Possible causes
- Debugging steps
- Prevention strategies
Severity Classification
Use consistent severity levels across all findings:
🔴 CRITICAL - System broken, data loss possible, security breach
Fix immediately (same day)
🔴 HIGH - Data integrity risk, major functionality broken, significant security gap
Fix within 1 week
🟡 MEDIUM - Performance degradation, poor UX, moderate security risk
Fix within 1 month
🟢 LOW - Minor issues, nice-to-haves, limited impact
Fix when convenient
Tips
Start broad, then deep: Audit all areas at high level first, then dive deep into problem areas.
Use checklists systematically: Don't skip items—systematic coverage catches hidden issues.
Provide examples: Every finding should include code snippet or scenario showing the problem.
Be specific in recommendations: "Add foreign key constraints" is better than "improve data integrity."
Test your findings: Verify issues exist before documenting (run queries, test endpoints).
Consider the audience: Technical findings for engineers, executive summary for leadership.
Common Gotchas
Don't just audit code: Also check deployment config, environment variables, DNS, SSL certs.
Don't ignore "working" systems: Just because it works doesn't mean it's correct (e.g., missing FK constraints).
Don't assume test coverage: Verify tests exist and pass for critical paths.
Don't skip documentation: Undocumented systems are harder to maintain and debug.
Don't forget cleanup: Temporary resources, expired codes, old configs—all accumulate over time.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

