jira-draft
Skill0 starsChanged 13 days agoMITView on GitHub
Draft a CUBRID Jira issue (bug or task) from the current work, or redraft an existing one: a short English title and a Korean body under English section headers, ready to paste. Draft only, never posts. To read an issue, use jira-fetch. Triggers on phrases like 'jira 이슈 초안 작성해줘', 'CBRD 이슈 초안', '이 작업 jira 이슈로 정리'.
In this repository22 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- blogSkill
- ci-checkSkill
- cmt-manualSkill
- commitSkill
- cubrid-manualSkill
- hhh-dialect-verify-reportSkill
- hhh-dialect-verifySkill
- java-formatSkill
- jdbc-ctp-verify-reportSkill
- jira-fetchSkill
- noteSkill
- pr-draftSkill
- pr-reviewSkill
- reportSkill
- review-triageSkill
- self-reviewSkill
- skill-createSkill
- submodule-bumpSkill
- tutorSkill
- weekly-reportSkill
- worklogSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 25
Do not invent. If a field is unknown, write (확인 필요) rather than guessing.
- Very specific: line 76
Form: write each item as 현재 → 목표, concrete down to the version, path, or value, and use a table once there are several.
- Very specific: line 85
One bullet = one fact: never cram 현재 → 목표 into a single sentence.
- Distinctive: line 87
Say a shared fact once, up front: when several rows share the same current state, state it once before the table and leave only what …
- Distinctive: line 88
Split blocks that differ in kind: do not mix behavior, scope, exclusions, and no-change into one bullet list.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Draft a CUBRID JIRA issue
Write a ready-to-paste CUBRID JIRA issue from the current work. Title in concise English; section headers in English; body in Korean. The Description reads as plain, easy-to-understand prose (a reader new to the issue should get it); the other sections are 개조식 (bullet points, 핵심만). This produces a draft only. You paste it into JIRA; the skill does not post.
Step 1: Pick the type
- bug: something is broken / misbehaving.
- task: non-bug work (개선 / 기능 / 일반 작업).
Infer from the context; ask only if it is genuinely unclear.
Step 2: Gather the facts
Pull the specifics from the session (or ask the user):
- bug: 증상, 빌드/버전, 재현 절차, 기대 vs 실제.
- task: 무엇을·왜, 사양 변경 여부, 구현 방향, 완료 조건.
Do not invent. If a field is unknown, write (확인 필요) rather than guessing. (Optional: verify CUBRID behavior or terms with cubrid-manual before asserting.)
Step 3: Write the draft
Title (English, concise): [<AREA>] <short summary>: one line, specific, no trailing period. Example: [JDBC] getObject(LocalDateTime) throws on TIMESTAMP column.
Body (Korean, 개조식) under the English headers for the chosen type:
bug
## Description
처음 보는 사람도 이해할 수 있게 문제 상황을 서술체로 설명 (한두 문단)
## Test Build
- 빌드/버전/브랜치 (예: 11.3 latest, commit abc123)
## Repro
- 재현 절차 1
- 재현 절차 2
## Expected Result
- 기대 동작
## Actual Result
- 실제 동작 (에러/로그 요약)
## Additional Information
- (선택) 로그, 환경, 참고 링크task
## Description
이 작업이 무엇이고 왜 필요한지 서술체로 설명 (한두 문단)
## Specification Changes
- 바뀌는 것의 `현재 → 목표` (무엇이 달라지는가)
## Implementation
- 그것을 어떻게 구현하는가 (내부 흐름·범위)
## Acceptance Criteria
- 완료로 인정되는 조건 (검증 가능하게)
## Definition of Done
- 코드 / 테스트 / 문서 등 완료 기준What belongs in Specification Changes
QA and the manual writers read this section, so there is one test: does this work force a test or a document to change? Do not read "사양" narrowly as "an SQL syntax change". If any of these differs, the answer is not 없음:
- 동작: query results, default behavior, error codes and messages, log or output format
- 인터페이스: SQL syntax, function and API signatures, JDBC behavior, CLI options
- 설정: parameters added or removed, defaults, allowed ranges
- 산출물·의존성: library versions, the shipped jar set, file paths and names, supported JDK and platforms
- 제약: supported scope, compatibility, performance guarantees
Form: write each item as 현재 → 목표, concrete down to the version, path, or value, and use a table once there are several. Pinning down what does not change helps too (e.g. "그 외 라이브러리·경로 변경 없음").
Genuinely 없음 covers only a pure internal refactor where nothing observable from outside changes. Even then, do not write a bare "없음": say in one line what stayed the same (e.g. "없음 (동작·인터페이스·산출물 구성 동일)").
Write it to be read (shape rules)
The reader should get it by skimming. Shape is not a matter of taste: the shape of the data decides it.
- Table / bullets / sentence: the same field repeated across several targets is a table (columns: 대상 · 현재 · 변경 후); two or three unrelated facts are bullets; one fact is just a sentence.
- One bullet = one fact: never cram
현재 → 목표into a single sentence. When the result differs by condition, make the condition the row of a table. - Pull a list of four or more out of the sentence: do not chain more than four class/file/option names with commas. Split them into a table or list when the reader needs each name; compress to 기준 + 개수 when they only need the scope (e.g. "
Wrapper를 구현하는 7개 클래스, 상속 포함 12개 타입"). - Say a shared fact once, up front: when several rows share the same current state, state it once before the table and leave only what differs inside it.
- Split blocks that differ in kind: do not mix behavior, scope, exclusions, and no-change into one bullet list.
Rules: Description is 서술체 (one or two easy paragraphs), every other section is 개조식 (one line per item, essentials only). Do not drop an empty section: leave 없음 or (확인 필요) (only Additional Information may be omitted when there is nothing). No em-dash (—): use commas, colons, parentheses, periods.
Step 4: Output
Print the draft in one copy-paste block: the English title line, then the Korean body. Do not post to JIRA: tell the user to paste it into a new CUBRID JIRA issue.
(If CUBRID JIRA renders wiki markup rather than Markdown in your project, convert ## X to h2. X and - to * when pasting.)
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

