agentleFS
SpaghetticodersSpaghetticoders/developer-skills/skills/start-work/SKILL.md

start-work

Skill1 starsChanged 16 days agoMITView on GitHub

Starts a piece of work from a list of tickets (Jira, Linear, ClickUp) or from a description. Reads the cards and their comments, writes a plan and stops to wait for the go-ahead. Then runs the full protocol (branch, development, tests, gui-test, audit rounds, report) without committing until told to.

17 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 13 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Check whether it's already done: Before estimating, look at the code: a card sometimes describes something someone else has already closed.

    line 16
  2. Distinctive:

    Then stop and wait for the go-ahead: Don't touch the code before that.

    line 26
  3. Distinctive:

    If reading raises a question that would change the plan, ask it now, not halfway through the work.

    line 28
  4. Distinctive:

    Cases that can't be produced on demand get mocked: If a condition needs data the backend doesn't return (an empty profile, an expired …

    line 39
  5. Very specific:

    Every fix must be verified with verify-for-real: break it and watch the test fail before keeping it.

    line 54
  6. Distinctive:

    Stop and ask before implementing: Don't invent copy or measurements, and don't silently implement the version that looks right to you.

    line 59

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 13 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Starting a piece of work

Invoked with a list of tickets, or with a description in words. Everything else in this file is the protocol: it applies even when the user doesn't repeat it.

1. Understand before planning

  • Read every card and its comments. Comments hold course corrections the description doesn't: fix requests, decisions made in a call, Figma nodes. A card read without its comments is a card read halfway.
  • Check whether it's already done. Before estimating, look at the code: a card sometimes describes something someone else has already closed. Checking costs a grep and changes the plan.
  • Project facts (base branch, tracker, simulator, flavor, Figma file) live in the project docs: AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, the project memory. Read them, don't ask for them. Only ask for what really isn't there.

2. The plan, and then stop

A short plan: what changes, where, what breaks, what is still to be decided. Then stop and wait for the go-ahead. Don't touch the code before that.

If reading raises a question that would change the plan, ask it now, not halfway through the work.

3. Execution

Branch from the project's base branch, following the convention the repo already uses (look at the latest branches: git for-each-ref --sort=-committerdate refs/remotes).

Then, for each slice: development → tests → gui-test on the simulator → iterate until the screen is right. See gui-test and figma-check.

Cases that can't be produced on demand get mocked. If a condition needs data the backend doesn't return (an empty profile, an expired cache, no network), build a mock page in a developer menu, next to the project's other ones. It's also how people who don't code get to try the case.

4. Audit rounds

Audit 1, 2, ... N. An audit means rereading the diff and rerunning tests and gui-test, not just looking at the code.

Stop when a whole round produces only cosmetic findings: formatting, a stale number in a doc. That's the sign the curve has flattened: the first rounds find real defects, the last ones hygiene. Then one last security audit (what ends up on disk, what in the logs, what survives logout) and one last round of tests.

Every fix must be verified with verify-for-real: break it and watch the test fail before keeping it.

5. When the design looks wrong

Stop and ask before implementing. Don't invent copy or measurements, and don't silently implement the version that looks right to you.

But don't block everything: do all the work that doesn't depend on that answer, hold back only the uncertain piece, and ask at the right moment, not at the end of the turn. If the user decides to deviate from Figma, the deviation must be written down (code, docs, test) or someone will "restore" it by rereading the node.

6. Wrapping up

  • No commits and no pushes until the user says so. See deliver.
  • No comments on the tickets unless asked.
  • A final report: what was done, which defects came up and how they were measured, what is still open and what is waiting for the user's decision.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.