deliver
Skill1 starsChanged 16 days agoMITView on GitHub
Turns a dirty working tree into disjoint, readable commits, with English messages. Never pushes unless told to, and when given a time it really commits and pushes at that time.
25 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- zahidakhyar/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- frostney/knipstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/agent-configtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/claudetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- mblauberg/provenanttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- AcKeskin/contexturetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use prune, create-issue and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
matthewpSkillprune
Find and remove unused CSS in a Tideway project — classes defined in stylesheets but never referenced in markup. Use whenever the user wants to prune dead CSS, find unused styles or classes, clean up or slim a stylesheet, find orphaned BEM classes, or "tree-shake" hand-written CSS.
Also in 3 projects that use this
sahinSkillcreate-issue
Also in 3 projects that use this
BlockSkillplan
Draft a TDD, PRD, or lightweight plan in the conversation without committing it.
Also in 5 projects that use this
SentrySkillspec
Produce a verified spec — problem, desired outcome, and acceptance criteria — before building. Use when given a GitHub/Linear issue link, when starting from a fuzzy in-conversation idea, or asked to "figure out what to do" / "scope this" / "what should I build" — whenever the *what* isn't yet pinned down. Grills the ambiguities, checks the premise against the code, and produces acceptance criteria you sign off on — then hands to design-first.
Also in 4 projects that use this
AWSSkillship
Finalize dev work on an issue branch — update docs, push, and open a PR.
Also in 5 projects that use this
AWSSkillwait-what
Stop. That last message did not land: re-pitch it.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions25 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 25
- google-gemini/gemini-managed-agents-templates★ 99same name
- domengabrovsek/agent-config★ 22same name
- domengabrovsek/claude★ 22same name
- domitriusclark/claude-skills★ 11same name
- coder-xieshijie/dev-skills★ 5same name
- AcKeskin/contexture★ 2same name
- andeeplus/aplus★ 2same name
- MarkTripoli/skills★ 2same name
- matiopala/skills★ 2same name
- dcguim/skills★ 1same name
15 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- figma-checkSkill
- gui-testSkill
- squadraSkill
- start-workSkill
- verify-for-realSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 25 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 15
AI signatures in commits: the team decides, once: If the team doesn't want them (Co-Authored-By, "Generated with" in commits, PRs and …
- Distinctive: line 42
If it prints anything, you wrote it in Italian.
- Distinctive: line 51
every modified file is in exactly one group.
- Distinctive: line 52
no group names files that haven't changed.
- Distinctive: line 59
If the user says "commit at 17:54", the commit and the push must happen
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 25 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Delivering
The rules that don't change
- Never push unless the user says so. A commit is proposed, not taken for granted: yesterday's authorisation doesn't hold today.
- Messages in English, conventional commits.
- Code comments in English, even where the file next door has them in another language.
- AI signatures in commits: the team decides, once. If the team doesn't want
them (
Co-Authored-By, "Generated with" in commits, PRs and release notes), make it mechanical instead of trusting memory: turn attribution off in the Claude Code settings and add acommit-msghook that rejects a message containing it.
# .git/hooks/commit-msg
grep -qiE 'co-authored-by:.*(claude|anthropic)|generated with' "$1" \
&& { echo "commit-msg: AI signature in the message"; exit 1; } || exit 0Before committing
- Sweep the junk:
find . -name '._*' -not -path './.git/*' -deleteon ExFAT or network volumes, and check none of it made it into the index. - Leave local files out. Some projects have changes that must never be committed (framework swaps for the simulator, local xcconfigs). They are listed in the project docs. After the commit, check they stayed out.
- Check the language of added comments, mechanically and not from memory. Example for people who work in Italian:
git diff | grep '^+' | grep -vE '^\+\+\+' | sed 's/^+//' | grep -E '^\s*(///|//)' \
| grep -iE '\b(che|non|della|delle|una|perché|quindi|senza|già|questo|questa)\b'If it prints anything, you wrote it in Italian. It happens because the conversation is in Italian and you write in the language you think in: the check catches it, good intentions don't.
Grouping
With many modified files, a single commit is unreadable. Partition them into disjoint groups, one theme per commit, and check before running:
- every modified file is in exactly one group;
- no group names files that haven't changed.
A file touched by two different themes goes into one group only: pick the one that tells the why, and mention the other in the message body.
Commits at a given time
If the user says "commit at 17:54", the commit and the push must happen really at that time, not earlier with a rewritten date.
Prepare the groups and the messages, schedule the run, and don't touch the files in those groups until it has fired: the command adds whatever it finds at that moment, so any other change in between would end up inside. Work on other files while you wait, and check the log afterwards.
And don't stage anything while you wait. git add <paths> followed by
git commit -F <file> commits the whole index, not just the added paths:
work done in the meantime and staged would end up in the scheduled commit with
a message that has nothing to do with it. Before each scheduled time, check that
git diff --cached --name-only prints nothing.
Verify afterwards, on the commits and not on the working state. A file that
is still modified doesn't prove it wasn't committed earlier:
git log --name-only --format=%h <base>..HEAD | grep '^ios/' is the right question.
The message
It says what changes and why, not which lines. If the fix comes from a measurement, the measurement goes in the body: that's what makes the commit useful six months from now.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

