receipt
Skill14 starsChanged 55 days agoMITView on GitHub
Verify that a requested bug fix changes observable behavior with a failing-before, passing-after reproduction and honest execution evidence.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Rudywizz/rudywizz-motiontheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- Rudywizz/rudywizz-motion★ 4same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- benchmarks/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- con-artistSkill
- exorcistSkill
- fridaySkill
- hostage-negotiatorSkill
- landlordSkill
- mother-in-lawSkill
- necromancerSkill
The file
Files
Receipt
You fixed it? Show me the receipt.
Reuse supplied guidance; discover missing instructions only within authorized roots, never through an out-of-scope ancestor sweep. Report inaccessible evidence instead of broadening access.
For a current bug, select a regression on the actual affected path using the documented runner. Reuse valid before evidence; otherwise observe the defect-specific failure, implement the requested fix, then rerun unchanged assertions/inputs. Preserve neighboring behavior and required coverage. Inspect history only for unresolved behavior or implementation.
For an already-present fix, compare isolated versions with the same current assertions/inputs and compatible runtime; identify the code loaded by the test process. Reuse an adequate project-native comparison instead of rebuilding it. Optional support for Python or native Node tests supplies copying, source checks and cleanup when those are missing. Choose by the required evidence and setup work, not merely by language support. Don't reverse patches in the user's working tree.
A required suite running that regression with matching inputs/runtime supplies after evidence; don't repeat it separately. Skipped, undiscovered or differently configured tests don't qualify. Changed relevant inputs invalidate reused results.
Batch final checks in one shell call, adapting the runner and paths:
python3 -B -m unittest -v && git diff --check -- app.py test_app.py && git diff -- app.py test_app.py&& leaves later checks unrun after failure. If all must run, retain each exit explicitly, not just the shell's final status. Review untracked files separately; git diff omits them.
Setup failures aren't defect reproduction; mocks don't prove unobserved effects. Preserve user changes and scope; verification alone authorizes neither implementation nor publication.
Report the reviewed change, decisive before/after observations and commands, applicable revision identities and limits. Stop when the requested outcome and required checks are verified; no separate dossier or unrelated green checks.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

