friday
Skill14 starsChanged 55 days agoMITView on GitHub
Review a planned deployment or release diff for rollback feasibility, mixed-version compatibility, migrations, and configuration readiness without deploying it.
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- sammollaei/law-firm-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- heyitsgoad/guardian-council-skillstheir own version, first seen Jun 16, 2026
- er1chu/claude-skills-weeklytheir own version, first seen Mar 3, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- er1chu/claude-skills-weekly★ 3same name
- sammollaei/law-firm-skills★ 1same name
- heyitsgoad/guardian-council-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- benchmarks/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- con-artistSkill
- exorcistSkill
- hostage-negotiatorSkill
- landlordSkill
- mother-in-lawSkill
- necromancerSkill
- receiptSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Use the release diff and documented rollout/rollback order to identify reachable states, old/new artifacts, configuration and consumers.
- Distinctive: line 30
Stop when scoped compatibility and recovery paths are assessed.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Friday
Can Monday-you undo this?
Read Monday's incident report early
When discovery is needed, combine it with reading supplied release notes/contracts and available project instructions, then batch the discovered relevant inputs. Avoid a listing-only round trip when supplied inputs are already readable. Keep Git internals out of file discovery (for example, rg --files --hidden -g '!.git'); use Git commands for relevant history. Reopen files when changed, incomplete or needed for an unresolved question.
Use the release diff and documented rollout/rollback order to identify reachable states, old/new artifacts, configuration and consumers. Consult history for unresolved versions, contracts or ordering, not redundant commit metadata. Do not impose rolling deployment or zero downtime on another strategy.
For each reachable state, check active readers/writers against data and configuration, including new-version writes before rollback. Select witnesses from actual branches, representation boundaries and transitions; enumerate finite inputs only when value-dependent behavior or requested assurance warrants it. Reuse a pairing's evidence while code, inputs and relevant state remain unchanged: phase labels alone need no rerun, but changed data, configuration, effects or ordering require affected pairings to be rechecked. Include queued/external effects when their contract changes.
Combine compatible coverage obligations into representative sequences instead of multiplying every value by every version/operation. For latest-value contracts, existing representative records can undergo successive writes; retain distinct records when earlier payloads or interactions must survive. Check observations after each relevant transition and final recovery; expand combinations when branches, cross-record effects or requested assurance require them. Fewer witnesses must not mean reusing stale observations.
Code rollback is not data recovery: down migrations can lose data, and backups need restore evidence. Consider expand/migrate/contract when destructive schema changes must coexist with older consumers.
Find the first incompatible/irreversible step and last recoverable state; tie blockers to the smallest compatible ordering or prerequisite. Local SQL is not production-readiness evidence; staging requires authorization.
Choose execution from the contract: exercise actual application writers, transactions and connections when they matter. For repeated SQL-only SQLite reader checks, use the optional in-memory matrix; read its guide only for that path, and implementation for trust/adaptation/troubleshooting. Use existing runners for simple checks. The matrix cannot substitute for application/runtime evidence or another database engine.
Deliver and stop
Lead with ready, ready with conditions, or blocked by evidence. Missing runtime/configuration evidence is unknown, not safe. Give each finding's step, failure, evidence and mitigation, not repeated full logs.
Stop when scoped compatibility and recovery paths are assessed; no generic infrastructure audit. Preserve user changes and requirements. Review does not authorize implementation, deployment, production migration, restore drills or publication. If asked to fix, verify the scoped correction without releasing it.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

