slide-deck-builder
Skill1 starsChanged 38 days agoMITView on GitHub
Structure a persuasive slide deck - narrative arc, one-idea-per-slide discipline, and headlines written as takeaways not labels. Use when building any presentation that must move an audience to a decision.
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- vicfromthegtmclub/gtmskillstheir own version, first seen Aug 10, 2026
- Hassaan146/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 25, 2026
- pb-jwhitlock/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Jun 2, 2026
- l3mpire/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Apr 13, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- Hassaan146/claude-skills★ 18same name
- l3mpire/claude-skills★ 9same name
- vicfromthegtmclub/gtmskills★ 1same name
- pb-jwhitlock/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
15 rules. 0 are common, 15 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
15
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Before writing a single slide, answer three questions in writing:
- Distinctive: line 23
Default structure for a decision-driving deck:
- Distinctive: line 28
Ask - the specific decision or action requested
- Distinctive: line 30
Never start with the ask. Never bury the complication in slide 9.
- Distinctive: line 36
If a slide requires a sub-bullet to be understood, it has two ideas.
- Distinctive: line 38
Do not use slides as documents.
- Distinctive: line 42
Every headline should be a complete, opinionated sentence - not a topic label - and short enough to read in one glance (about 12 words is …
- Distinctive: line 67
Read the bad chain and you learn nothing.
- Distinctive: line 80
No live slide exceeds one idea or 40 words of body.
- Distinctive: line 86
Do not open the slide tool before the headline chain is written - building slides first locks in a structure the argument then has to fight.
- Distinctive: line 87
Do not paste dense tables or full paragraphs from the source document onto live slides.
- Distinctive: line 88
Do not soften or hide the ask to seem less presumptuous - an audience that cannot tell what you want will decide nothing.
- Distinctive: line 89
Do not write bullets you intend to read aloud verbatim.
- Distinctive: line 90
Do not let appendix content creep into the main flow "just in case someone asks" - that is what the appendix is for.
- Distinctive: line 91
Do not reuse a deck built for one audience on another.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Slide Deck Builder
A slide deck is an argument, not a filing cabinet. Every structural choice either advances or dilutes the central point. Build the narrative before touching any slide.
Build the spine first
Before writing a single slide, answer three questions in writing:
- What does the audience believe now?
- What should they believe or do after?
- What is the single most important thing standing between those two states?
That gap is the deck's job. Every slide serves the journey across it. A deck that does not answer all three is not ready to build.
Narrative arc
Default structure for a decision-driving deck:
- Situation - shared context the audience already holds as true
- Complication - what changed or what is broken; the tension
- Resolution - the proposed path forward
- Proof - evidence the resolution works
- Ask - the specific decision or action requested
Never start with the ask. Never bury the complication in slide 9.
Size the deck to the meeting: budget roughly 2 minutes of talk time per slide, so a 30-minute decision meeting supports 10-15 slides - anything past that is appendix material.
One idea per slide
If a slide requires a sub-bullet to be understood, it has two ideas. Split it. The test: cover the body and read only the headline. If the point still lands, the slide is right. If the body is doing the work, the headline is wrong.
Do not use slides as documents. If content requires more than 40 words to be understood, it belongs in an appendix or a leave-behind - not on a live slide.
Headlines as takeaways
Every headline should be a complete, opinionated sentence - not a topic label - and short enough to read in one glance (about 12 words is the ceiling).
- Wrong: 'Market Analysis'
- Right: 'The market is growing 3x faster than our current capacity'
A reader who only reads headlines should get the whole argument. If the headlines form a logical chain, the deck is structurally sound.
Worked example: the headline chain
The fastest structural check is reading only the headlines aloud.
Bad (topic labels - no argument):
- Background
- Market Overview
- Our Product
- Financials
- Next Steps
Good (each headline a claim, and the sequence is the argument):
- Support tickets doubled in two quarters while headcount stayed flat
- Manual triage is the bottleneck: 60% of agent time goes to routing, not solving
- Auto-triage cuts routing time to near zero in the three teams that piloted it
- Rolling it out company-wide costs $200k and pays back in under two quarters
- We're asking for approval to start the rollout next sprint
Read the bad chain and you learn nothing. Read the good chain and you could make the decision without seeing a single slide body - which is exactly the standard.
Slides to audit before finalizing
- Slide 1 (title): Does it name the audience's problem, not the presenter's topic?
- Agenda slide: Cut it unless the deck is longer than 20 slides or the audience is unfamiliar with each other.
- 'About us' slide: Move it to the appendix unless credibility is genuinely in question.
- Last slide: The final slide should show the ask, not 'Thank You'.
Quality bar
- The three spine questions are answered in writing before slide one exists.
- Reading only the headlines, in order, delivers the complete argument.
- No live slide exceeds one idea or 40 words of body.
- The final slide is the ask, stated as a specific decision or action.
- The slide count fits the meeting length at ~2 minutes per slide.
Do NOT
- Do not open the slide tool before the headline chain is written - building slides first locks in a structure the argument then has to fight.
- Do not paste dense tables or full paragraphs from the source document onto live slides; excerpt the one number or claim that matters and move the rest to the appendix.
- Do not soften or hide the ask to seem less presumptuous - an audience that cannot tell what you want will decide nothing.
- Do not write bullets you intend to read aloud verbatim; the slide supports the talk, it is not the script.
- Do not let appendix content creep into the main flow "just in case someone asks" - that is what the appendix is for.
- Do not reuse a deck built for one audience on another; the spine questions have different answers, so the deck must too.
Escape hatches
For conference talks, lead with the resolution - audiences came to learn, not to be convinced. For investor decks, follow the problem / solution / traction / team / ask sequence. For board updates, lead with the decision needed; context comes after.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

