task-closeout
Skill0 starsChanged yesterdayMITView on GitHub
Close out a task before saying it is done; remove the scratch files it created, check the diff for private material and unsupported claims, write a handoff, or retire a branch or worktree. Use when finishing work, when asked for a handoff or session summary, or before deleting a branch. Not for where docs belong (documentation-hygiene).
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Hypercubed/Agent-Knowledge-Starter-Kittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- linchpin/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- Hypercubed/Agent-Knowledge-Starter-Kit★ 7same name
- linchpin/skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository34 other files it gives its agents.
- astroSkill
- bun-standardsSkill
- postgresSkill
- react-engineeringSkill
- rust-standardsSkill
- spring-bootSkill
- tailwind-v4Skill
- typescript-standardsSkill
- vitest-testingSkill
- api-designSkill
- architecture-reviewSkill
- benchmark-readiness-reviewSkill
- cli-designSkill
- codebase-scoutingSkill
- code-review-findingsSkill
- config-projection-reviewSkill
- documentation-hygieneSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- formal-verificationSkill
- implementation-planningSkill
- orchestration-workflowSkill
- problem-clarificationSkill
- product-copySkill
- refactorSkill
- repository-text-hygieneSkill
- researchSkill
- security-scope-reviewSkill
- setup-canastaSkill
- system-designSkill
- tddSkill
- technical-writingSkill
- upstream-contributionSkill
- writing-issuesSkill
- writing-prSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
Leave the tree with the task's useful changes and nothing else, and leave the next person what they cannot reconstruct.
- Distinctive: line 20
Stop and remove what you started: Stop the processes, servers and watchers the task started, and close its browser tabs, also when the task …
- Very specific: line 36
Docs: When the task touched documentation, finish documentation-hygiene's close-out checks.
- Distinctive: line 40
Learn from repeats: When the same correction came up again, find why the existing feedback missed it and propose a safeguard where it …
- Distinctive: line 56
every file the task created is kept with a reason, or removed.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Task closeout
Leave the tree with the task's useful changes and nothing else, and leave the next person what they cannot reconstruct. Apply this to the files this task created or changed; finishing a task does not authorize a repository-wide cleanup.
- Inventory. Inspect the diff and new files, including untracked ones. Mark each as kept, removed, or someone else's.
- Stop and remove what you started. Stop the processes, servers and watchers the task started, and close its browser tabs, also when the task failed or was cancelled. Delete task-created scratch files and generated media that have no remaining use. Keep user work and files of unknown origin until their owner and disposition are known. Never use broad clean or reset commands to make the tree look clean. Honor legal, audit, release and repository retention requirements.
- Check what goes public. Review additions for private material (personal paths, credentials, session context, private project or client names, and internal infrastructure: secret-store names and what they hold, private repositories and their paths, hosts, accounts) and for completion claims no check supports. Editing published text doesn't remove it: hosts such as GitHub keep earlier versions, so delete, close and replace, or rewrite an unmerged branch. If sensitive material is already committed or published, removing the working copy does not repair it: surface it for a security response without reproducing it.
- Docs. When the task touched documentation, finish
documentation-hygiene's close-out checks. - Report. Give the useful changes, the checks run with their results, and the material gaps in the reply. Not a new cleanup report by default.
- Learn from repeats. When the same correction came up again, find why the existing feedback missed it and propose a safeguard where it belongs (a validation rule, clearer ownership, better instructions), with what it would catch and what it leaves to judgment. Get approval before adding enforcement beyond the task.
Load a reference only for its task:
- A handoff or session summary for whoever continues: handoff.md.
- Retiring a branch, worktree or remote ref: branch-retirement.md. Local and remote deletion each need their own explicit authorization.
Done when
- every file the task created is kept with a reason, or removed;
- the diff holds no private material and no unsupported claim;
- the reply lists the checks run and the gaps left.
This procedure grants no publication, history-rewrite or deletion authority beyond the user's task.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

