agentleFS
RostislavDuginRostislavDugin/postgresus/.agents/skills/openspec-update-change/SKILL.md

openspec-update-change

Skill9.1k starsChanged 42 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Update an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

13 rules. 9 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • 9

    Common

    Most of the 74 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Common:

    If a name is provided, use it.

    line 29
  2. Very specific:

    If ambiguous, run openspec list --json to get available changes sorted by most recently modified, and ask the user to select one

    line 32
  3. Common:

    When prompting, present the top 3-4 most recently modified changes as options, showing:

    line 34
  4. Very specific:

    Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., $openspec-update-change (Codex) or /openspec-update-change (other …

    line 42
  5. Common:

    If the user asked for a specific revision ("the design now uses X"), that is the starting edit.

    line 59
  6. Common:

    If they only said "update" / "make this coherent", treat it as a coherence review: read the existing artifacts and check them against each …

    line 60
  7. Common:

    Read the artifact(s) the request touches and the change's other existing artifacts.

    line 63
  8. Common:

    If the change is already coherent, say so and make no edits.

    line 67
  9. Common:

    If the user rejects a revision, do not write it - leave that artifact unchanged.

    line 71
  10. Common:

    When a substantial rewrite is needed, get that artifact's rules and template first:

    line 72
  11. Common:

    After each invocation, show:

    line 84
  12. Very specific:

    Use the artifact ids and paths reported by openspec status.

    line 91
  13. Very specific:

    Do not advance the build frontier: no new artifacts, no new files under glob artifacts - that is $openspec-continue-change (Codex) or …

    line 93

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 74 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Humanizer preflight

Before starting this workflow, read the sibling ../humanizer/SKILL.md completely. This preflight is mandatory before any message or action. Apply the skill in embedded mode to every user-facing message and all prose written to OpenSpec artifacts. Preserve exact commands, code, paths, identifiers, schema keywords, templates, quotations, user-provided text, facts, scope, and technical meaning.

Revise a change's existing planning artifacts and keep them coherent. Never edit code.

Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context, schemas, view). Once selected, treat --store <id> as sticky for the rest of the workflow. Every unscoped example of those commands below is shorthand: before running it, append the flag. For example, run openspec status --change "<name>" --json --store "<id>", not the unscoped form shown below. Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.

Input: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.

$openspec-continue-change (Codex) or /openspec-continue-change (other agents) is an optional workflow and may not be installed. Before suggesting it anywhere below, verify that it is available. If it is unavailable, openspec status --change "<name>" --json shows the next artifact and openspec instructions "<artifact-id>" --change "<name>" --json explains how to create it.

Steps

  1. Select the change

    If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:

    • Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
    • Auto-select if only one active change exists
    • If ambiguous, run openspec list --json to get available changes sorted by most recently modified, and ask the user to select one

    When prompting, present the top 3-4 most recently modified changes as options, showing:

    • Change name
    • Schema (from schema field if present, otherwise "spec-driven")
    • Status (e.g., "0/5 tasks", "complete", "no tasks")
    • How recently it was modified (from lastModified field)

    Mark the most recently modified change as "(Recommended)" since it's likely what the user wants to update.

    Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., $openspec-update-change (Codex) or /openspec-update-change (other agents) <other>).

  2. Get the change's artifacts

    openspec status --change "<name>" --json

    Parse the JSON to understand current state. The response includes:

    • schemaName: The workflow schema being used (e.g., "spec-driven")
    • artifacts: Array of artifacts with their status ("done", "skipped", "ready", "blocked")
    • isPlanningComplete: Boolean indicating if all planning artifacts are complete. Older CLI versions expose the same value as isComplete.
    • planningHome, changeRoot, artifactPaths, and actionContext: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.

    The artifact ids and paths come from the active schema - do NOT assume them, and do NOT branch on hardcoded artifact names. Custom schemas must work unchanged.

    The files to edit are artifactPaths.<id>.existingOutputPaths - the concrete files that exist on disk, already glob-expanded for glob artifacts (e.g. specs/**/*.md). Do NOT write to resolvedOutputPath: for a glob artifact it is still the glob pattern, not a real file.

  3. Understand the request
    • If the user asked for a specific revision ("the design now uses X"), that is the starting edit.
    • If they only said "update" / "make this coherent", treat it as a coherence review: read the existing artifacts and check them against each other for contradictions, gaps, and duplication.
  4. Read and reconcile
    • Read the artifact(s) the request touches and the change's other existing artifacts.
    • Apply the requested edit. Then check every other existing artifact against it - in ANY direction: an edit to a later artifact may require revising an earlier one, not only the other way around. Build order is a useful reading order, not a constraint on which artifacts may be revised.
    • Note everything that is now inconsistent, missing, or contradictory.
    • Revise only files that already exist (existingOutputPaths). Do NOT create artifacts that don't exist yet, and do NOT invent new files under a glob artifact - note them and point the user to $openspec-continue-change (Codex) or /openspec-continue-change (other agents) to create them.
    • If the change is already coherent, say so and make no edits.
  5. Confirm and apply, one artifact at a time
    • Show each proposed revision and why. Write only after the user confirms.
    • If the user rejects a revision, do not write it - leave that artifact unchanged.
    • When a substantial rewrite is needed, get that artifact's rules and template first:
      openspec instructions "<artifact-id>" --change "<name>" --json
  6. Point to the next step (guidance only - NEVER act on it)
    • Artifacts still missing -> suggest $openspec-continue-change (Codex) or /openspec-continue-change (other agents) to create them.
    • Change already implemented (tasks checked off / already applied) -> the code may no longer match the revised plan; suggest $openspec-apply-change (Codex) or /openspec-apply-change (other agents) to carry the delta into code.
    • Everything done and implemented -> suggest $openspec-archive-change (Codex) or /openspec-archive-change (other agents).

Output

After each invocation, show:

  • Which artifacts were revised (and which proposed revisions were rejected)
  • Anything deferred to $openspec-continue-change (Codex) or /openspec-continue-change (other agents) (not-yet-created artifacts or files)
  • Where the change stands and the recommended next command

Guardrails

  • Planning artifacts only - NEVER edit implementation code. If the revised plan implies code changes, stop and point to $openspec-apply-change (Codex) or /openspec-apply-change (other agents).
  • Use the artifact ids and paths reported by openspec status; never branch on hardcoded artifact names.
  • Edit only the concrete files in existingOutputPaths; never write to a glob resolvedOutputPath.
  • Do not advance the build frontier: no new artifacts, no new files under glob artifacts - that is $openspec-continue-change (Codex) or /openspec-continue-change (other agents)'s job.
  • Confirm every edit with the user before writing.
  • If the request changes the change's intent rather than refining it, first verify whether the optional $openspec-new-change (Codex) or /openspec-new-change (other agents) workflow is available. If it is, recommend starting fresh with $openspec-new-change (Codex) or /openspec-new-change (other agents) (the "Update vs. Start Fresh" heuristic). If it is unavailable, ask for a distinct unused change name and recommend openspec new change "<new-change-name>" instead.

Download now (ZIP)

Trending

Quiet since July.thin dataabout the whole repository

Dec 2025: 4 mentionsJan 2026: 1 mentionFeb 2026: 0 mentionsMar 2026: 0 mentionsApr 2026: 0 mentionsMay 2026: 0 mentionsJun 2026: 0 mentionsJul 2026: 1 mentionAug 2026: 0 mentionsSep 2026: 0 mentionsOct 2026: 0 mentionsNov 2026: 0 mentions
Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Mentions a month of the RostislavDugin/postgresus repository that our weekly crawl found: only 10 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend. There is no adoption data for this file yet.

Who's talking about RostislavDugin/postgresus

The biggest 5 of 10 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.

See all 10

Talked about on GitHub and Bluesky (10 times).

On GitHub · 7

2 more on GitHub
  • Other versions75 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 74

    1. Fission-AI/OpenSpec★ 73k46% same
    2. halo-dev/halo★ 40k86% same
    3. databasus/databasus★ 9.2k94% same
    4. aiogram/aiogram★ 5.9k86% same
    5. MCSManager/MCSManager★ 5k46% same
    6. Azure/azure-cli★ 4.7k86% same
    7. owncloud/android★ 4.2k93% same
    8. BytePioneer-AI/codex-host★ 3k46% same
    9. belav/csharpier★ 2.3k86% same
    10. arabold/docs-mcp-server★ 1.8k60% same

    64 more not listed

    Wrote their own version · 1

    1. studyzy/OpenSpec-cn★ 1.2ksame name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • Used alongsideProjects with it also use draft-openspec-docs, release-openspec and 8 more.

    Other files people use alongside this one.

    Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
    • studyzySkill

      draft-openspec-docs

      OpenSpec 文档的协作式页面起草模式。在目标页面内部构建一份草稿计划(目的、结构、编号起草步骤),与用户一起迭代,然后按已批准的步骤逐章节起草,并在完成后清理自身。在页面需要从头重写,或一个新区块需要用户参与塑形时使用。

      Also in 3 projects that use this

    • studyzySkill

      release-openspec

      Use this skill when releasing OpenSpec: audit merged work and changeset coverage, decide whether a catch-up changeset PR is needed, prepare or resume the Changesets Version Packages PR, cut a beta or stable release, verify publishing, and polish GitHub release notes. Also use when asked whether an open release PR is complete, what the next release step is, or to continue a release paused for human approval.

      Also in 3 projects that use this

    • ElasticSkill

      openspec-verify-change

      Verify implementation matches change artifacts. Use when the user wants to validate that implementation is complete, correct, and coherent before archiving.

      Also in 20 projects that use this

    • MicrosoftSkill

      openspec-onboard

      Guided onboarding for OpenSpec - walk through a complete workflow cycle with narration and real codebase work.

      Also in 13 projects that use this

    • MicrosoftSkill

      openspec-ff-change

      Fast-forward through OpenSpec artifact creation. Use when the user wants to quickly create all artifacts needed for implementation without stepping through each one individually.

      Also in 13 projects that use this

    • ElasticSkill

      openspec-continue-change

      Continue working on an OpenSpec change by creating the next artifact. Use when the user wants to progress their change, create the next artifact, or continue their workflow.

      Also in 13 projects that use this

    • +2 more from studyzy
    • +1 more from elastic
    • +1 more from microsoft
  • In this repository18 other files it gives its agents.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.