agentleFS
RostislavDuginRostislavDugin/postgresus/.agents/skills/openspec-propose/SKILL.md

openspec-propose

Skill9.1k starsChanged 42 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

23 rules. 5 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.

  • 5

    Common

    Most of the 150 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 10

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 8

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    When the user is ready to implement, they must start the apply workflow explicitly.

    line 29
  2. Distinctive:

    If no clear input is provided, ask the user (open-ended, no preset options):

    line 41
  3. Common:

    IMPORTANT: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.

    line 46
  4. Distinctive:

    If the request contains ambiguity that would materially affect scope, externally observable behavior, compatibility, or acceptance …

    line 48
  5. Distinctive:

    Use the configured default schema unless the user explicitly requests a different workflow.

    line 52
  6. Distinctive:

    Use a todo list to track progress through the artifacts.

    line 86
  7. Distinctive:

    Read any completed dependency files for context - always re-read them from disk, even if you saw them earlier in the conversation (the user …

    line 103
  8. Very specific:

    If the instruction field delegates creation to a specific skill or command, invoke it to produce the artifact instead of writing the file …

    line 104
  9. Very specific:

    After creating each artifact, re-run openspec status --change "<name>" --json

    line 110
  10. Distinctive:

    Create every artifact in the required set that is missing, then re-check - creating one can unblock others

    line 114
  11. Very specific:

    Stop when every artifact in the required set is done, skipped, or was deliberately skipped

    line 117
  12. Distinctive:

    Ask the user to clarify

    line 120
  13. Common:

    After completing all artifacts, summarize:

    line 130
  14. Very specific:

    Follow the instruction field from openspec instructions for each artifact type - it is the authoritative guidance, even for familiar …

    line 138
  15. Very specific:

    If the instruction field directs you to use a specific skill or command to create the artifact, invoke it instead of writing the artifact …

    line 139
  16. Common:

    Read dependency artifacts for context before creating new ones

    line 141
  17. Very specific:

    Use template as the structure for your output file - fill in its sections

    line 142
  18. Very specific:

    Do NOT copy <context>, <rules>, <project_context> blocks into the artifact

    line 144
  19. Very specific:

    Create every artifact the apply phase transitively depends on, not just the ids listed in apply.requires

    line 149
  20. Distinctive:

    Always read dependency artifacts before creating a new one - re-read from disk, not from conversation memory (files may have changed since …

    line 150
  21. Distinctive:

    Ask about ambiguities that would materially change scope, externally observable behavior, compatibility, or acceptance criteria.

    line 151
  22. Common:

    If a change with that name already exists, ask if user wants to continue it or create a new one

    line 152
  23. Common:

    Verify each artifact file exists after writing before proceeding to next

    line 153

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 150 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Humanizer preflight

Before starting this workflow, read the sibling ../humanizer/SKILL.md completely. This preflight is mandatory before any message or action. Apply the skill in embedded mode to every user-facing message and all prose written to OpenSpec artifacts. Preserve exact commands, code, paths, identifiers, schema keywords, templates, quotations, user-provided text, facts, scope, and technical meaning.

Propose a new change - create the change and generate all artifacts in one step.

Planning boundary: This workflow creates planning artifacts only. The user request that selected or triggered this workflow authorizes planning only, even if it asks to build or fix something. Do not edit project code. After the planning artifacts are complete, stop. Do not start implementation in the same response, even if the initial request asks for it. Wait for a new user request after the artifacts are presented; then start the apply workflow.

I'll create a change with the artifacts your schema defines. With the default spec-driven schema that is:

  • proposal.md (what & why)
  • specs/<capability-path>/spec.md (what the system must do - a delta, not the main spec)
  • design.md (how)
  • tasks.md (implementation steps)

<capability-path> is the spec directory relative to specs/ (for example, user-auth or identity/user-auth). Preserve an existing capability's full path and follow the project's established organization for new capabilities.

When the user is ready to implement, they must start the apply workflow explicitly.


Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context, schemas, view). Once selected, treat --store <id> as sticky for the rest of the workflow. Every unscoped example of those commands below is shorthand: before running it, append the flag. For example, run openspec status --change "<name>" --json --store "<id>", not the unscoped form shown below. Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.

Input: The user's request should include a change name (kebab-case) OR a description of what they want to build.

Steps

  1. Understand the request and clarify material ambiguity

    If no clear input is provided, ask the user (open-ended, no preset options):

    "What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."

    From their description, derive a kebab-case name (e.g., "add user authentication" → add-user-auth).

    IMPORTANT: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.

    If the request contains ambiguity that would materially affect scope, externally observable behavior, compatibility, or acceptance criteria, ask the user before creating the change. For minor details, make a reasonable assumption and record it in the planning artifacts.

  2. Determine the workflow schema

    Use the configured default schema unless the user explicitly requests a different workflow.

    Use a different schema only if the user:

    • Explicitly requests a specific schema by name → use --schema <schema-name>
    • Asks to "show workflows" or asks "what workflows" exist → resolve the authoritative root by running openspec context --json from the current working directory. If the user explicitly selected a registered store, use openspec context --json --store "<store-id>". Then run openspec schemas --json with its working directory set to the returned root.path and let them choose. This preserves roots selected by a local store: pointer or the global defaultStore; when a registered store was explicitly selected, append --store "<store-id>" to openspec schemas --json as well. If context reports only no_openspec_root, run openspec schemas --json from the current working directory instead. Do not use this fallback for invalid or unavailable stores.

    Otherwise, omit --schema to preserve the configured default.

  3. Create the change directory

    Choose one schema form below. If a registered store is selected, append --store "<store-id>" to that command and each later OpenSpec command shown below that accepts --store.

    Using the configured default:

    openspec new change "<name>"

    Using an explicitly requested schema:

    openspec new change "<name>" --schema "<schema-name>"

    This creates a scaffolded change in the planning home resolved by the CLI with .openspec.yaml.

  4. Get the artifact build order
    openspec status --change "<name>" --json
    Parse the JSON to get:
    • applyRequires: array of artifact IDs needed before implementation (e.g., ["tasks"])
    • artifacts: list of all artifacts, each with its status and its requires edges (the artifact IDs it directly depends on)
    • planningHome, changeRoot, artifactPaths, and actionContext: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.
  5. Create every artifact in the required set

    Use a todo list to track progress through the artifacts.

    Loop through artifacts in dependency order (artifacts with no pending dependencies first):

    a. For each artifact that is ready (dependencies satisfied):

    • Get instructions:
      openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json
    • The instructions JSON includes:
      • context: Project background (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)
      • rules: Artifact-specific rules (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)
      • template: The structure to use for your output file
      • instruction: Schema-specific guidance for this artifact type
      • skipped/warning: present when the change declares skip_specs and this artifact must NOT be created - stop and pick another artifact
      • resolvedOutputPath: Resolved path or pattern to write the artifact
      • dependencies: Completed artifacts to read for context
    • Read any completed dependency files for context - always re-read them from disk, even if you saw them earlier in the conversation (the user may have edited them)
    • If the instruction field delegates creation to a specific skill or command, invoke it to produce the artifact instead of writing the file yourself, then verify the artifact file exists at resolvedOutputPath
    • Otherwise create the artifact file using template as the structure and write it to resolvedOutputPath. If resolvedOutputPath is a glob, follow instruction to choose the concrete file path
    • Apply context and rules as constraints - but do NOT copy them into the file
    • Show brief progress: "Created <artifact-id>"

    b. Continue until every artifact in the required set exists (not just apply.requires)

    • After creating each artifact, re-run openspec status --change "<name>" --json
    • The required set is applyRequires plus every artifact reachable from those by following the requires edges in status --json - walk them transitively (spec-driven closes over proposal, specs, design, tasks). Leave artifacts outside that set alone
    • status is file-existence only, so an applyRequires artifact reading done does NOT mean its dependencies exist - writing tasks.md early marks tasks done while specs was never written. Use each artifact's requires edges, not its status, to build the required set: a done artifact still lists what it depends on
    • An artifact already reading status: "skipped" is satisfied: the change declares skip_specs in .openspec.yaml, so its files must NOT exist. Never try to create one
    • Create every artifact in the required set that is missing, then re-check - creating one can unblock others
    • Skip one only when status already reports it skipped, or when its own instruction says it is conditional: run openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json and skip only if its instruction field marks it optional (e.g. "create only if..."). Spec-driven's design.md qualifies; specs qualifies only via the skipped status above, never by your own judgment. Tell the user, and do not reconsider it
    • Dependencies are enablers, not gates: if a required artifact is still blocked only because you skipped a conditional dependency, write it anyway
    • Stop when every artifact in the required set is done, skipped, or was deliberately skipped

    c. If an artifact requires user input (unclear context):

    • Ask the user to clarify
    • Then continue with creation
  6. Show final status
    openspec status --change "<name>"

Output

After completing all artifacts, summarize:

  • Change name and location
  • List of artifacts created with brief descriptions, plus any conditional artifact you skipped and why
  • What's ready: "All artifacts needed for implementation are ready."
  • Prompt: "The artifacts are ready for review. When you are ready, run $openspec-apply-change (Codex) or /openspec-apply-change (other agents) or ask me to apply this change."

Artifact Creation Guidelines

  • Follow the instruction field from openspec instructions for each artifact type - it is the authoritative guidance, even for familiar artifact names
  • If the instruction field directs you to use a specific skill or command to create the artifact, invoke it instead of writing the artifact directly
  • The schema defines what each artifact should contain - follow it
  • Read dependency artifacts for context before creating new ones
  • Use template as the structure for your output file - fill in its sections
  • IMPORTANT: context and rules are constraints for YOU, not content for the file
    • Do NOT copy <context>, <rules>, <project_context> blocks into the artifact
    • These guide what you write, but should never appear in the output

Guardrails

  • The request that invoked this workflow authorizes planning only. Any implementation or apply instruction in that request does not carry forward. Do NOT implement the change, start the apply workflow, or edit project code during this workflow. After presenting the artifacts, stop and wait for a new user request to start the apply workflow
  • Create every artifact the apply phase transitively depends on, not just the ids listed in apply.requires
  • Always read dependency artifacts before creating a new one - re-read from disk, not from conversation memory (files may have changed since you last saw them)
  • Ask about ambiguities that would materially change scope, externally observable behavior, compatibility, or acceptance criteria; for minor details, make reasonable assumptions and record them
  • If a change with that name already exists, ask if user wants to continue it or create a new one
  • Verify each artifact file exists after writing before proceeding to next

Download now (ZIP)

Trending

Quiet since July.thin dataabout the whole repository

Dec 2025: 4 mentionsJan 2026: 1 mentionFeb 2026: 0 mentionsMar 2026: 0 mentionsApr 2026: 0 mentionsMay 2026: 0 mentionsJun 2026: 0 mentionsJul 2026: 1 mentionAug 2026: 0 mentionsSep 2026: 0 mentionsOct 2026: 0 mentionsNov 2026: 0 mentions
Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Mentions a month of the RostislavDugin/postgresus repository that our weekly crawl found: only 10 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend. There is no adoption data for this file yet.

Who's talking about RostislavDugin/postgresus

The biggest 5 of 10 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.

See all 10

Talked about on GitHub and Bluesky (10 times).

On GitHub · 7

2 more on GitHub
  • Other versions153 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 150

    1. Fission-AI/OpenSpec★ 73k61% same
    2. halo-dev/halo★ 40k71% same
    3. gogf/gf★ 13k64% same
    4. databasus/databasus★ 9.2k100% same
    5. fonoster/fonoster★ 8.1k66% same
    6. fleetdm/fleet★ 7.1k64% same
    7. KunAgent/Kun★ 6.3k64% same
    8. XingYu-Zhong/DeepSeek-GUI★ 6.3k64% same
    9. aiogram/aiogram★ 5.9k71% same
    10. akkadotnet/akka.net★ 5.1k64% same

    140 more not listed

    Wrote their own version · 3

    1. studyzy/OpenSpec-cn★ 1.2ksame name
    2. henhen6/mdp★ 133same name
    3. beautifulSoup/speccoding-template★ 62same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • Used alongsideProjects with it also use source-command-opsx-apply, source-command-opsx-archive and 9 more.

    Other files people use alongside this one.

    Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
    • antech2-asyncSkill

      source-command-opsx-apply

      Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change (Experimental)

      Also in 5 projects that use this

    • antech2-asyncSkill

      source-command-opsx-archive

      Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow

      Also in 5 projects that use this

    • studyzySkill

      draft-openspec-docs

      OpenSpec 文档的协作式页面起草模式。在目标页面内部构建一份草稿计划(目的、结构、编号起草步骤),与用户一起迭代,然后按已批准的步骤逐章节起草,并在完成后清理自身。在页面需要从头重写,或一个新区块需要用户参与塑形时使用。

      Also in 3 projects that use this

    • studyzySkill

      release-openspec

      Use this skill when releasing OpenSpec: audit merged work and changeset coverage, decide whether a catch-up changeset PR is needed, prepare or resume the Changesets Version Packages PR, cut a beta or stable release, verify publishing, and polish GitHub release notes. Also use when asked whether an open release PR is complete, what the next release step is, or to continue a release paused for human approval.

      Also in 3 projects that use this

    • ElasticSkill

      openspec-verify-change

      Verify implementation matches change artifacts. Use when the user wants to validate that implementation is complete, correct, and coherent before archiving.

      Also in 39 projects that use this

    • ElasticSkill

      openspec-continue-change

      Continue working on an OpenSpec change by creating the next artifact. Use when the user wants to progress their change, create the next artifact, or continue their workflow.

      Also in 27 projects that use this

    • +2 more from antech2-async
    • +2 more from studyzy
  • In this repository18 other files it gives its agents.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

Reviews can't be read right now.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.