openspec-propose
Skill9.1k starsChanged 42 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
23 rules. 5 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.
5
Common
Most of the 150 edited versions we read keep these.
10
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
8
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 29
When the user is ready to implement, they must start the apply workflow explicitly.
- Distinctive: line 41
If no clear input is provided, ask the user (open-ended, no preset options):
- Common: line 46
IMPORTANT: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.
- Distinctive: line 48
If the request contains ambiguity that would materially affect scope, externally observable behavior, compatibility, or acceptance …
- Distinctive: line 52
Use the configured default schema unless the user explicitly requests a different workflow.
- Distinctive: line 86
Use a todo list to track progress through the artifacts.
- Distinctive: line 103
Read any completed dependency files for context - always re-read them from disk, even if you saw them earlier in the conversation (the user …
- Very specific: line 104
If the instruction field delegates creation to a specific skill or command, invoke it to produce the artifact instead of writing the file …
- Very specific: line 110
After creating each artifact, re-run openspec status --change "<name>" --json
- Distinctive: line 114
Create every artifact in the required set that is missing, then re-check - creating one can unblock others
- Very specific: line 117
Stop when every artifact in the required set is done, skipped, or was deliberately skipped
- Distinctive: line 120
Ask the user to clarify
- Common: line 130
After completing all artifacts, summarize:
- Very specific: line 138
Follow the instruction field from openspec instructions for each artifact type - it is the authoritative guidance, even for familiar …
- Very specific: line 139
If the instruction field directs you to use a specific skill or command to create the artifact, invoke it instead of writing the artifact …
- Common: line 141
Read dependency artifacts for context before creating new ones
- Very specific: line 142
Use template as the structure for your output file - fill in its sections
- Very specific: line 144
Do NOT copy <context>, <rules>, <project_context> blocks into the artifact
- Very specific: line 149
Create every artifact the apply phase transitively depends on, not just the ids listed in apply.requires
- Distinctive: line 150
Always read dependency artifacts before creating a new one - re-read from disk, not from conversation memory (files may have changed since …
- Distinctive: line 151
Ask about ambiguities that would materially change scope, externally observable behavior, compatibility, or acceptance criteria.
- Common: line 152
If a change with that name already exists, ask if user wants to continue it or create a new one
- Common: line 153
Verify each artifact file exists after writing before proceeding to next
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 150 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Humanizer preflight
Before starting this workflow, read the sibling ../humanizer/SKILL.md completely. This preflight is mandatory before any message or action. Apply the skill in embedded mode to every user-facing message and all prose written to OpenSpec artifacts. Preserve exact commands, code, paths, identifiers, schema keywords, templates, quotations, user-provided text, facts, scope, and technical meaning.
Propose a new change - create the change and generate all artifacts in one step.
Planning boundary: This workflow creates planning artifacts only. The user request that selected or triggered this workflow authorizes planning only, even if it asks to build or fix something. Do not edit project code. After the planning artifacts are complete, stop. Do not start implementation in the same response, even if the initial request asks for it. Wait for a new user request after the artifacts are presented; then start the apply workflow.
I'll create a change with the artifacts your schema defines. With the default spec-driven schema that is:
- proposal.md (what & why)
specs/<capability-path>/spec.md(what the system must do - a delta, not the main spec)- design.md (how)
- tasks.md (implementation steps)
<capability-path> is the spec directory relative to specs/ (for example, user-auth or identity/user-auth). Preserve an existing capability's full path and follow the project's established organization for new capabilities.
When the user is ready to implement, they must start the apply workflow explicitly.
Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context, schemas, view). Once selected, treat --store <id> as sticky for the rest of the workflow. Every unscoped example of those commands below is shorthand: before running it, append the flag. For example, run openspec status --change "<name>" --json --store "<id>", not the unscoped form shown below. Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.
Input: The user's request should include a change name (kebab-case) OR a description of what they want to build.
Steps
Understand the request and clarify material ambiguity
If no clear input is provided, ask the user (open-ended, no preset options):
"What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."
From their description, derive a kebab-case name (e.g., "add user authentication" →
add-user-auth).IMPORTANT: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.
If the request contains ambiguity that would materially affect scope, externally observable behavior, compatibility, or acceptance criteria, ask the user before creating the change. For minor details, make a reasonable assumption and record it in the planning artifacts.
Determine the workflow schema
Use the configured default schema unless the user explicitly requests a different workflow.
Use a different schema only if the user:
- Explicitly requests a specific schema by name → use
--schema <schema-name> - Asks to "show workflows" or asks "what workflows" exist → resolve the authoritative root by running
openspec context --jsonfrom the current working directory. If the user explicitly selected a registered store, useopenspec context --json --store "<store-id>". Then runopenspec schemas --jsonwith its working directory set to the returnedroot.pathand let them choose. This preserves roots selected by a localstore:pointer or the globaldefaultStore; when a registered store was explicitly selected, append--store "<store-id>"toopenspec schemas --jsonas well. If context reports onlyno_openspec_root, runopenspec schemas --jsonfrom the current working directory instead. Do not use this fallback for invalid or unavailable stores.
Otherwise, omit
--schemato preserve the configured default.- Explicitly requests a specific schema by name → use
Create the change directory
Choose one schema form below. If a registered store is selected, append
--store "<store-id>"to that command and each later OpenSpec command shown below that accepts--store.Using the configured default:
openspec new change "<name>"Using an explicitly requested schema:
openspec new change "<name>" --schema "<schema-name>"This creates a scaffolded change in the planning home resolved by the CLI with
.openspec.yaml.- Get the artifact build order
Parse the JSON to get:openspec status --change "<name>" --jsonapplyRequires: array of artifact IDs needed before implementation (e.g.,["tasks"])artifacts: list of all artifacts, each with itsstatusand itsrequiresedges (the artifact IDs it directly depends on)planningHome,changeRoot,artifactPaths, andactionContext: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.
Create every artifact in the required set
Use a todo list to track progress through the artifacts.
Loop through artifacts in dependency order (artifacts with no pending dependencies first):
a. For each artifact that is
ready(dependencies satisfied):- Get instructions:
openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json - The instructions JSON includes:
context: Project background (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)rules: Artifact-specific rules (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)template: The structure to use for your output fileinstruction: Schema-specific guidance for this artifact typeskipped/warning: present when the change declares skip_specs and this artifact must NOT be created - stop and pick another artifactresolvedOutputPath: Resolved path or pattern to write the artifactdependencies: Completed artifacts to read for context
- Read any completed dependency files for context - always re-read them from disk, even if you saw them earlier in the conversation (the user may have edited them)
- If the
instructionfield delegates creation to a specific skill or command, invoke it to produce the artifact instead of writing the file yourself, then verify the artifact file exists atresolvedOutputPath - Otherwise create the artifact file using
templateas the structure and write it toresolvedOutputPath. IfresolvedOutputPathis a glob, followinstructionto choose the concrete file path - Apply
contextandrulesas constraints - but do NOT copy them into the file - Show brief progress: "Created
<artifact-id>"
b. Continue until every artifact in the required set exists (not just
apply.requires)- After creating each artifact, re-run
openspec status --change "<name>" --json - The required set is
applyRequiresplus every artifact reachable from those by following therequiresedges instatus --json- walk them transitively (spec-driven closes over proposal, specs, design, tasks). Leave artifacts outside that set alone statusis file-existence only, so anapplyRequiresartifact readingdonedoes NOT mean its dependencies exist - writingtasks.mdearly markstasksdone whilespecswas never written. Use each artifact'srequiresedges, not itsstatus, to build the required set: adoneartifact still lists what it depends on- An artifact already reading
status: "skipped"is satisfied: the change declaresskip_specsin.openspec.yaml, so its files must NOT exist. Never try to create one - Create every artifact in the required set that is missing, then re-check - creating one can unblock others
- Skip one only when
statusalready reports itskipped, or when its owninstructionsays it is conditional: runopenspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --jsonand skip only if itsinstructionfield marks it optional (e.g. "create only if..."). Spec-driven'sdesign.mdqualifies;specsqualifies only via theskippedstatus above, never by your own judgment. Tell the user, and do not reconsider it - Dependencies are enablers, not gates: if a required artifact is still
blockedonly because you skipped a conditional dependency, write it anyway - Stop when every artifact in the required set is
done,skipped, or was deliberately skipped
c. If an artifact requires user input (unclear context):
- Ask the user to clarify
- Then continue with creation
- Get instructions:
- Show final status
openspec status --change "<name>"
Output
After completing all artifacts, summarize:
- Change name and location
- List of artifacts created with brief descriptions, plus any conditional artifact you skipped and why
- What's ready: "All artifacts needed for implementation are ready."
- Prompt: "The artifacts are ready for review. When you are ready, run
$openspec-apply-change (Codex) or /openspec-apply-change (other agents)or ask me to apply this change."
Artifact Creation Guidelines
- Follow the
instructionfield fromopenspec instructionsfor each artifact type - it is the authoritative guidance, even for familiar artifact names - If the
instructionfield directs you to use a specific skill or command to create the artifact, invoke it instead of writing the artifact directly - The schema defines what each artifact should contain - follow it
- Read dependency artifacts for context before creating new ones
- Use
templateas the structure for your output file - fill in its sections - IMPORTANT:
contextandrulesare constraints for YOU, not content for the file- Do NOT copy
<context>,<rules>,<project_context>blocks into the artifact - These guide what you write, but should never appear in the output
- Do NOT copy
Guardrails
- The request that invoked this workflow authorizes planning only. Any implementation or apply instruction in that request does not carry forward. Do NOT implement the change, start the apply workflow, or edit project code during this workflow. After presenting the artifacts, stop and wait for a new user request to start the apply workflow
- Create every artifact the apply phase transitively depends on, not just the ids listed in
apply.requires - Always read dependency artifacts before creating a new one - re-read from disk, not from conversation memory (files may have changed since you last saw them)
- Ask about ambiguities that would materially change scope, externally observable behavior, compatibility, or acceptance criteria; for minor details, make reasonable assumptions and record them
- If a change with that name already exists, ask if user wants to continue it or create a new one
- Verify each artifact file exists after writing before proceeding to next
Trending
Quiet since July.thin dataabout the whole repository
Who's talking about RostislavDugin/postgresus
- @its-me-rhk.bsky.social“🗄️ Postgresus — Alat open-source untuk monitoring & backup database PostgreSQL dengan antarmuka web. ⚡ …”Bluesky · Oct 30, 2025 · 3 likes
- Dokploy/templates“Postgresus template seems outdated – project renamed to Databasus”GitHub · Jan 19, 2026 · 1 reactions
- truenas/apps“[App Request]: Postgresus / Databasus”GitHub · Dec 19, 2025 · 1 reactions
- @mariuskimmina.com“"Postgresus" is just peak project naming (and it also seems really awesome) github.com/RostislavDug...”Bluesky · Dec 6, 2025 · 1 likes
- @harungecit.dev“PostgreSQL kullanıyorsan ama yedekleme & izleme seni yoruyorsa: 💡 Postgresus tam sana göre! 🕒 Otomatik …”Bluesky · Oct 30, 2025 · 1 likes
The biggest 5 of 10 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.
See all 10
Talked about on GitHub and Bluesky (10 times).
On GitHub · 7
- Jan 19, 2026Postgresus template seems outdated – project renamed to Databasus — Dokploy/templates1 reaction
- Dec 19, 2025[App Request]: Postgresus / Databasus — truenas/apps1 reaction
- Jul 14, 2026fix: add Databasus template (Postgresus was renamed upstream) — Dokploy/templates0 reactions · 1 comment
- Dec 11, 2025Redirect to https://postgresus.com/storages/google-oauth instead of my hosted Postgresus domain — databasus/databasus0 reactions · 2 comments
- Dec 7, 2025Email Notifier Password can't be empty when creating — databasus/databasus0 reactions · 2 comments
2 more on GitHub
- Nov 17, 2025Databasus — community-scripts/DevScripts0 reactions · 6 comments
- Sep 14, 2025Update PostgreSQL badge in README — pgmq/pgmq0 reactions
On Bluesky · 3
- Oct 30, 2025🗄️ Postgresus — Alat open-source untuk monitoring & backup database PostgreSQL dengan antarmuka web. ⚡ Fitur utama: jadwal backup,… — @its-me-rhk.bsky.social3 likes and reposts
- Dec 6, 2025"Postgresus" is just peak project naming (and it also seems really awesome) github.com/RostislavDug... — @mariuskimmina.com1 likes and repost
- Oct 30, 2025PostgreSQL kullanıyorsan ama yedekleme & izleme seni yoruyorsa: 💡 Postgresus tam sana göre! 🕒 Otomatik yedekler ☁️ S3, Drive, NAS desteği… — @harungecit.dev1 likes and repost
Other versions153 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 150
- Fission-AI/OpenSpec★ 73k61% same
- halo-dev/halo★ 40k71% same
- gogf/gf★ 13k64% same
- databasus/databasus★ 9.2k100% same
- fonoster/fonoster★ 8.1k66% same
- fleetdm/fleet★ 7.1k64% same
- KunAgent/Kun★ 6.3k64% same
- XingYu-Zhong/DeepSeek-GUI★ 6.3k64% same
- aiogram/aiogram★ 5.9k71% same
- akkadotnet/akka.net★ 5.1k64% same
140 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 3
- studyzy/OpenSpec-cn★ 1.2ksame name
- henhen6/mdp★ 133same name
- beautifulSoup/speccoding-template★ 62same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use source-command-opsx-apply, source-command-opsx-archive and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
antech2-asyncSkillsource-command-opsx-apply
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change (Experimental)
Also in 5 projects that use this
antech2-asyncSkillsource-command-opsx-archive
Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow
Also in 5 projects that use this
studyzySkilldraft-openspec-docs
OpenSpec 文档的协作式页面起草模式。在目标页面内部构建一份草稿计划(目的、结构、编号起草步骤),与用户一起迭代,然后按已批准的步骤逐章节起草,并在完成后清理自身。在页面需要从头重写,或一个新区块需要用户参与塑形时使用。
Also in 3 projects that use this
studyzySkillrelease-openspec
Use this skill when releasing OpenSpec: audit merged work and changeset coverage, decide whether a catch-up changeset PR is needed, prepare or resume the Changesets Version Packages PR, cut a beta or stable release, verify publishing, and polish GitHub release notes. Also use when asked whether an open release PR is complete, what the next release step is, or to continue a release paused for human approval.
Also in 3 projects that use this
ElasticSkillopenspec-verify-change
Verify implementation matches change artifacts. Use when the user wants to validate that implementation is complete, correct, and coherent before archiving.
Also in 39 projects that use this
ElasticSkillopenspec-continue-change
Continue working on an OpenSpec change by creating the next artifact. Use when the user wants to progress their change, create the next artifact, or continue their workflow.
Also in 27 projects that use this
- +2 more from antech2-async
- +2 more from studyzy
In this repository18 other files it gives its agents.
- adr/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- backend/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- frontend/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- website/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- adr/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- backend/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- frontend/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- website/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- git-commitsSkill
- how-to-communicateSkill
- openspec-apply-changeSkill
- openspec-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-exploreSkill
- openspec-sync-specsSkill
- openspec-update-changeSkill
- humanizerSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

