agentleFS
RaditteAnggoroRaditteAnggoro/skill-for-lazy-developer/AGENTS.md

skill-for-lazy-developer

AGENTS.md1 starsChanged 7 days agoMITView on GitHub

This repository distributes instructions, examples, and small validation tools. Keep changes focused on a demonstrated workflow need. The consuming-project snippet is AGENTS.snippet.md; do not confuse it with this maintenance guide. Use the configured Python environment. Required checks after skill or tooling changes: For packaging changes, also run python scripts/build_release.py and inspect its archive contents. Local checks use temporary fixtures and have no production access. Fix failures caused by the requested change and rerun affected checks without seeking confirmation at each…

The file

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Keep one focused goal and a precise triggering description per skill.

    line 7
  2. Distinctive:

    Read only relevant supporting references.

    line 8
  3. Distinctive:

    Do not claim a tool, browser, hook, test result, or integration is available merely because instructions mention it.

    line 11
  4. Distinctive:

    Use the configured Python environment.

    line 16
  5. Very specific:

    Keep developer-specific paths, secrets, private source, local artifacts, and build output out of commits.

    line 29

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md

Maintaining Codex Developer Skills

This repository distributes instructions, examples, and small validation tools. Keep changes focused on a demonstrated workflow need. The consuming-project snippet is AGENTS.snippet.md; do not confuse it with this maintenance guide.

Skill changes

  • Keep one focused goal and a precise triggering description per skill.
  • Read only relevant supporting references; avoid copying the same procedure into several skills.
  • Preserve the user's explicit intent: a diagnosis, review, or planning request must not silently become implementation.
  • Preserve useful autonomy for authorized implementation. Do not add routine approval gates.
  • Do not claim a tool, browser, hook, test result, or integration is available merely because instructions mention it.
  • Cite and retain applicable license notices for imported third-party material.

Verification

Use the configured Python environment. Required checks after skill or tooling changes:

python scripts/validate_skills.py
python -m unittest discover -s tests -v

For packaging changes, also run python scripts/build_release.py and inspect its archive contents. Local checks use temporary fixtures and have no production access. Fix failures caused by the requested change and rerun affected checks without seeking confirmation at each step.

Structural tests do not prove skill quality. For significant workflow changes, try a representative request and record the observed outcome and limitations in the pull request. Do not invent evaluation results or promise efficiency gains.

Scope and artifacts

Keep developer-specific paths, secrets, private source, local artifacts, and build output out of commits. Update documentation and the changelog for user-visible changes. Increment VERSION only for an intended release. Creating or publishing a GitHub release remains a separate action from building an archive.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.