architecture-map
Skill1 starsChanged 7 days agoMITView on GitHub
Explain a repository's architecture, request flow, data lineage, or change impact using source-backed diagrams. Use on mapping requests, not routine edits.
7 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- DMcSweeney/ClaudeSkillstheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- kevintsai1202/architecture-maptheir own version, first seen Oct 2, 2026
- cristian-robert/claude-code-harnesstheir own version, first seen Sep 15, 2026
- almendili/skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 18, 2026
- Mesteriis/Engineering-Bible-AItheir own version, first seen Jun 28, 2026
- zanthrash/skillstheir own version, first seen May 20, 2026
Other versions7 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 7
- almendili/skills★ 382same name
- cristian-robert/claude-code-harness★ 2same name
- zanthrash/skills★ 1same name
- DMcSweeney/ClaudeSkills★ 0same name
- kevintsai1202/architecture-map★ 0same name
- mde-pach/claude-skills★ 0same name
- Mesteriis/Engineering-Bible-AI★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository16 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- adaptive-workflowSkill
- browser-diagnosticsSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- feature-discoverySkill
- lean-senior-engineeringSkill
- release-readinessSkill
- research-plan-implementSkill
- skill-security-guardSkill
- spec-to-code-verificationSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- transaction-safe-engineeringSkill
- ui-design-intelligenceSkill
- ui-implementationSkill
- ui-quality-verificationSkill
- verification-before-completionSkill
The file
Files
Architecture Map
Answer a specific architecture question using source evidence. User instructions and the actual code define the scope. Mapping a flow does not authorize refactoring it.
Select and trace
Resolve the requested flow: a screen action, endpoint, background task, import, or whole-system overview. Inspect actual entry points, callers, dependencies, and configuration. Trace input validation, authorization where present, state changes, reads/writes, external calls, and failure or retry paths relevant to the question.
Distinguish observed execution from inferred static paths. Label conditional and asynchronous edges. State unresolved dynamic routing or unavailable services. Do not invent infrastructure from directory names, package dependencies, or an outdated design document.
For a whole-repository request, produce an overview first and show which areas were sampled. Expand when needed to answer the question; do not imply exhaustive tracing from a partial scan.
Make the explanation inspectable
Choose the smallest useful format:
- Sequence diagram for ordered calls or asynchronous interaction.
- Flowchart for branches, retry loops, or state transitions.
- Component diagram for service ownership or boundaries.
- Table for field-to-field transformations or storage mappings.
Use Mermaid in Markdown by default. Use an HTML/SVG artifact when interaction or richer annotation is useful and supported. Keep generated artifacts self-contained when practical; do not upload source material to a third-party renderer. Check syntax with an available renderer, or disclose if rendering was not verified.
Give important nodes or edges identifiers and connect them to real file locations in an evidence table. Use repository-relative links in saved portable documents; use the host's clickable file convention in chat.
Explain consequences
State the answer in plain language, then show the diagram and supporting code. For data-processing questions, describe origin, transformations, destination, side effects, and failure behaviour. For change-impact questions, identify affected callers, contracts, tables, and tests; distinguish confirmed dependencies from candidates.
Report missing evidence and the next read-only check that would resolve it. Do not claim runtime timing, scale, or deployed topology without measurements or environment evidence.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

