planning-docs
Skill5 starsChanged 16 days agoMITView on GitHub
Planning skill for documentation - no changelog updates
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- veronicani/claude-code-configtheir own version, first seen Feb 23, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- veronicani/claude-code-config★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository50 other files it gives its agents.
- analyze-pr-commentsSkill
- architecture-analyzeSkill
- architecture-tradeoffSkill
- askSkill
- code-smellsSkill
- debugging-rocprof-sysSkill
- exploration-explore-codeSkill
- git-commitSkill
- git-gh-clientSkill
- git-prepare-pull-requestSkill
- git-pull-request-statusSkill
- gitSkill
- grill-meSkill
- library-amd-smiSkill
- notify-meSkill
- planning-architectureSkill
- planning-baseSkill
- planning-bugfixSkill
- planning-featureSkill
- planning-refactorSkill
- programming-cmake-best-practicesSkill
- programming-cpp-constexprSkill
- programming-cpp-design-patternsSkill
- programming-cpp-naming-rulesSkill
- programming-cpp-policy-based-diSkill
- programming-cppSkill
- programming-cpp-stl-algorithmsSkill
- programming-pythonSkill
- pr-review-interactiveSkill
- pr-reviewSkill
- radisha-create-skillSkill
- radisha-helpSkill
- radisha-improve-skillSkill
- radisha-skillsSkill
- radisha-updateSkill
- refactoring-techniquesSkill
- review-architectureSkill
- rocprofsys-buildSkill
- rocprofsys-configureSkill
- rocprofsysSkill
- static-analysisSkill
- testing-gtest-gmockSkill
- testing-pytestSkill
- testing-testplanSkill
- therock-build-to-commitSkill
- therock-commit-in-buildSkill
- therock-first-build-with-commitSkill
- update-pr-descriptionSkill
- verify-pmc-metricsSkill
- watchSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Use this skill when creating or updating documentation.
- Distinctive: line 13
Follow all base planning rules, plus the documentation-specific rules below.
- Distinctive: line 32
Consider who will read this documentation:
- Distinctive: line 42
Use clear headings and hierarchy
- Distinctive: line 44
Add diagrams for complex concepts
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Documentation Planning
Use this skill when creating or updating documentation.
<IMPORTANT>
**Prerequisites:** Invoke `planning-base` skill first if not already loaded. It provides the core planning phases (0-5).Follow all base planning rules, plus the documentation-specific rules below.
Documentation changes do NOT require changelog updates.
</IMPORTANT>
Documentation-Specific Requirements
Documentation Type
Identify what type of documentation is being created/updated:
- API Documentation - Endpoint descriptions, parameters, responses
- User Guide - How-to instructions for end users
- Developer Guide - Setup, architecture, contribution guidelines
- Code Comments - Inline documentation, JSDoc/Doxygen
- README - Project overview, quick start
- Architecture - System design, data flow, diagrams
Audience Analysis
Consider who will read this documentation:
- Who is the audience? - Developers, users, administrators?
- What do they need to know? - Concepts, procedures, references?
- What is their skill level? - Beginner, intermediate, expert?
Content Structure
Plan the documentation structure before writing:
- Use clear headings and hierarchy
- Include code examples where helpful
- Add diagrams for complex concepts
- Provide links to related documentation
Plan File Format
Save to planning/docs-<name>.md:
# Documentation: <Doc Name>
## Goal
<What documentation is being created/updated>
## Type
<API/User Guide/Developer Guide/Code Comments/README/Architecture>
## Audience
<Who will read this, their skill level, what they need>
## Analysis
<Current state, gaps, related docs>
## Tasks
- [ ] Task 1
- [ ] Task 2
- [ ] Review for clarity
## Structure
<Outline of documentation sections>
## Notes
<Style guides, templates to follow, related links>Example
User request: "Document the authentication flow"
Planning output:
# Documentation: Authentication Flow
## Goal
Create comprehensive documentation of the authentication system
## Type
Developer Guide + Architecture
## Audience
- Backend developers integrating with auth system
- New team members understanding the codebase
- Skill level: Intermediate developers
## Analysis
- Current state: Only inline code comments exist
- Gaps: No flow diagrams, no token lifecycle explanation
- Related: API docs mention auth but don't explain it
## Tasks
- [ ] Create auth flow diagram (login, refresh, logout)
- [ ] Document token lifecycle and storage
- [ ] Explain role-based access control
- [ ] Add code examples for common auth operations
- [ ] Review and link from main README
## Structure
1. Overview
2. Authentication Flow Diagram
3. Token Management
- Access tokens
- Refresh tokens
- Token storage
4. Role-Based Access Control
5. Code Examples
6. Troubleshooting
## Notes
- Use Mermaid for diagrams
- Follow existing docs/STYLE_GUIDE.md
- Link to API docs for endpoint detailsDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

