fallback-required
Skill2 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use before merging any PR that adds an LLM API call. Every call must handle timeout, malformed output, low confidence, and refusal — with a defined, user-safe fallback for each. Blocks "add error handling later" completions.
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- ai-cost-auditSkill
- ai-safety-reviewSkill
- context-optimizationSkill
- eval-before-shipSkill
- model-benchmarkingSkill
- prompt-versioningSkill
- rag-pipeline-designSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 32
Every LLM call must handle all four:
- Distinctive: line 45
Before writing the LLM call, answer: *what does this feature return when the model fails?*
- Distinctive: line 113
When fallback-required is satisfied, state it like this:
- Distinctive: line 126
All four modes required. A partially-handled call is an unhandled call.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Fallback Required
The Law
LLM CALLS WITHOUT FALLBACKS ARE TICKING FAILURES.
Every model times out. Every model returns garbage sometimes.
"The model is reliable" is a claim about averages — users experience tails.
A defined, tested fallback path for each failure mode IS reliability.When to Use
Trigger on every PR that:
- Adds a new LLM API call
- Changes existing error handling on a model call
- Adds streaming or async generation
- Introduces tool use or agentic function calls
When NOT to Use
- Offline batch jobs where failures can be retried with human review and no user is waiting
- Exploratory prototypes not going to production
The Four Failure Modes
Every LLM call must handle all four:
| Failure Mode | What Happens | Required Response |
| Timeout / API error | Network down, provider outage, slow response | Retry with exponential backoff (max 3), then graceful degradation |
| Malformed output | Wrong format, truncated JSON, schema violation | Schema validation → fallback to rule-based default |
| Low confidence | Model expresses uncertainty, output score below threshold | Route to fallback model, simpler rule, or human review |
| Refusal | Model declines to answer, content filter triggered | Detect refusal pattern → user-friendly error, do not surface raw refusal |
The Process
Step 1 — Define the Fallback Before Writing the Call
Before writing the LLM call, answer: what does this feature return when the model fails?
The fallback must be:
- User-safe — no error stack traces, no raw model output
- Defined — not "we'll figure it out" but a concrete response or behaviour
- Logged — every fallback invocation records the reason
Step 2 — Implement All Four Handlers
async def call_llm(prompt: str) -> Result:
for attempt in range(MAX_RETRIES):
try:
response = await llm.complete(
prompt, timeout=TIMEOUT_SECONDS
)
parsed = parse_and_validate(response) # raises OutputParseError on bad schema
if parsed.confidence < CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD: # default 0.7; use 0.85 for high-stakes domains
log_fallback("low_confidence", attempt)
return fallback_result(reason="low_confidence")
return parsed
except TimeoutError:
if attempt == MAX_RETRIES - 1:
log_fallback("timeout", attempt)
return fallback_result(reason="timeout")
await backoff(attempt)
except OutputParseError:
log_fallback("malformed_output", attempt)
return fallback_result(reason="malformed_output")
except RefusalError:
log_fallback("refused", attempt)
return fallback_result(reason="refused")
return fallback_result(reason="max_retries_exceeded")Step 3 — Write Tests for Each Failure Mode
def test_returns_fallback_on_timeout():
with mock_llm_timeout():
result = call_llm("...")
assert result.is_fallback is True
assert result.reason == "timeout"
def test_returns_fallback_on_malformed_output():
with mock_llm_response("not valid json{{{"):
result = call_llm("...")
assert result.is_fallback is TrueA fallback without a test is a promise, not an implementation.
Step 4 — Configure Alerting
Set an alert if fallback rate exceeds threshold (e.g., > 5% of calls in 5 min). High fallback rates signal prompt regressions, provider incidents, or input distribution shifts — none of which should be silent.
Rationalization Red Flags
These thoughts mean fallback handling is incomplete — stop:
- "The model is reliable enough" — p99 reliability at 100 calls/day is 3.65 failures/year; at 10,000 calls/day it is 365
- "We can add error handling after launch" — you will add it at 2am after the first incident
- "It's an internal tool, nobody will notice" — internal users file bugs when things fail silently
- "The API has its own retry logic" — provider retries don't produce your application's fallback response
- "The model almost never refuses" — "almost never" is a production incident waiting for volume
Completion Statement Format
When fallback-required is satisfied, state it like this:
Fallbacks implemented.
Timeout/API error: retry (max N, backoff Xs–Ys), then fallback_result("timeout") ✓
Malformed output: schema validation → fallback_result("malformed_output") ✓
Low confidence: threshold = X (default 0.7; 0.85 for medical/legal/financial) → fallback_result("low_confidence") ✓
Refusal: refusal pattern detection → fallback_result("refused") ✓
Tests: 4 failure-mode tests passing ✓
Fallback logging: reason field → <log destination> ✓
Alert: fallback rate > N% triggers <alert channel> ✓All four modes required. A partially-handled call is an unhandled call.
Why This Matters
LLM products fail differently than deterministic software. Timeouts spike under load. Output schemas break when models update. Confidence degrades on edge-case inputs. The fallback IS the product's reliability — the model is just the happy path.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

