agentleFS
RBraga01RBraga01/builder-ai/skills/ai-cost-audit/SKILL.md

ai-cost-audit

Skill2 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use before launching any LLM feature or when monthly API costs are growing unexpectedly. Requires token count measurement, call volume analysis, and cost projection at 10× scale. Blocks "it's cheap enough now" completions.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈8

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Before launching any LLM feature (pre-launch projection)

    line 20
  2. Distinctive:

    When monthly API bill increased > 20% with no obvious cause

    line 21
  3. Distinctive:

    Before scaling a feature to a new user segment

    line 22
  4. Distinctive:

    Before committing to a model or provider for a high-volume use case

    line 23
  5. Distinctive:

    When total monthly API cost is guaranteed < $50 regardless of 10× scale — skip the audit, check the bill quarterly

    line 29
  6. Distinctive:

    Do not estimate. Count:

    line 35
  7. Distinctive:

    If 10× monthly cost exceeds your budget threshold, optimise before scaling.

    line 88
  8. Distinctive:

    When ai-cost-audit is satisfied, state it like this:

    line 155

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

AI Cost Audit

The Law

EVERY LLM FEATURE HAS A COST TRAJECTORY. DISCOVER IT BEFORE 10× SCALE DISCOVERS YOU.
"It's cheap enough now" is a claim about current volume, not future volume.
"The API has reasonable pricing" is not a projection.
Token counts + call volume + cost at 10× scale IS a cost audit.

When to Use

Trigger:

  • Before launching any LLM feature (pre-launch projection)
  • When monthly API bill increased > 20% with no obvious cause
  • Before scaling a feature to a new user segment
  • Before committing to a model or provider for a high-volume use case

When NOT to Use

  • Internal one-off scripts or developer tools with < 50 calls/day — cost is negligible; write the call, move on
  • Features still in prototype where the call structure will change significantly before launch — audit after the design stabilises
  • When total monthly API cost is guaranteed < $50 regardless of 10× scale — skip the audit, check the bill quarterly

The Process

Step 1 — Count Tokens Precisely

Do not estimate. Count:

import tiktoken

enc = tiktoken.get_encoding("cl100k_base")  # cl100k for GPT/Claude

def count_tokens(text: str) -> int:
    return len(enc.encode(text))

# Measure each segment separately
print("System prompt:", count_tokens(system_prompt))
print("Avg context:", count_tokens(avg_context_sample))
print("Avg user message:", count_tokens(avg_user_message_sample))
print("Avg output:", count_tokens(avg_output_sample))

Get real samples from logs or representative test data — not the "hello world" example.

Step 2 — Measure Call Volume

Calls per user session: N
Sessions per day: M
Background/batch calls per day: K
Retry rate: R% (from logs or estimate)
Total calls per day: (N × M) + K × (1 + R/100)

Step 3 — Calculate Current Cost

COST_PER_1K_INPUT  = 0.003   # $/1k tokens — replace with actual model pricing
COST_PER_1K_OUTPUT = 0.015

def cost_per_call(input_tokens, output_tokens):
    return (input_tokens / 1000 * COST_PER_1K_INPUT
          + output_tokens / 1000 * COST_PER_1K_OUTPUT)

daily_cost    = cost_per_call(avg_input, avg_output) * calls_per_day
monthly_cost  = daily_cost * 30

Step 4 — Project at 10× Scale

Scale is never gradual — launches cause spikes. Always project at 10×:

ScaleCalls/dayMonthly costVerdict
Current (1×)N$XBaseline
10×10N$10XMust be under budget
100×100N$100XDirectional awareness

If 10× monthly cost exceeds your budget threshold, optimise before scaling.

Step 5 — Identify Top Cost Drivers

Rank by token contribution:

1. Context injection (RAG chunks): 3,200 tokens avg — 68% of input cost
2. System prompt: 800 tokens — 17% of input cost
3. User message: 200 tokens — 4% of input cost
4. Output: 400 tokens — 11% of total cost

Optimise the top driver first. The others compound on the same multiplier.

Step 6 — Apply Reduction Levers

LeverTypical SavingApply When
Prompt caching50–90% on cached inputSystem prompt > 500 tokens and stable
Reduce top_k in RAG20–50% input token reductionContext injection is top cost driver
Downgrade model tier3–10× cost reductionQuality meets threshold at lower tier (see model-benchmarking)
Semantic caching30–70% call reductionHigh repeat query rate
Pipeline splitting5–10× cost reductionFrontier model doing pre-processing tasks
Output cap10–30% output costmax_tokens not set or set too high

Step 7 — Document

Store in cost-audit/<feature>/<date>.md:

## AI Cost Audit — <feature> — <date>

Token breakdown (averages from N samples):
  System prompt: X tokens
  Context: Y tokens
  User message: Z tokens
  Output: W tokens
  Total per call: T tokens

Call volume: N calls/day (M sessions × P calls + K background)
Retry rate: R%

Cost at current volume: $X/month
Cost at 10× volume: $10X/month

Top driver: <context injection — Y tokens, Z%>

Reductions applied:
  1. <lever> — estimated saving: X%
  2. <lever> — estimated saving: Y%

Post-optimization projection: $X'/month at 10×

Rationalization Red Flags

These thoughts mean no cost audit was done — stop:

  • "It's cheap enough now" — at what volume? with what growth rate?
  • "We'll deal with costs when they're a problem" — you'll deal with them at 3am after the billing alert fires
  • "The model pricing is reasonable" — "reasonable" has no units; calculate the monthly figure
  • "It's not a consumer product so usage will be low" — internal tools get the most surprising usage
  • "The context is only a few paragraphs" — a few paragraphs is 400–800 tokens; multiply by call volume

Completion Statement Format

When ai-cost-audit is satisfied, state it like this:

Cost audit complete.
Avg input: N tokens (system: A, context: B, user: C)
Avg output: M tokens
Calls/day: D (retry rate: R%)

Current cost: $X/month
Cost at 10× scale: $Y/month (budget threshold: $Z/month ✓/⚠️)

Top cost driver: <driver> (N% of input cost)
Reductions planned: <levers> — projected saving: X%
Post-reduction projection at 10×: $Y'/month

Token samples from: <N representative calls from logs / test data — not estimated>
Stored: cost-audit/<feature>/<date>.md ✓

Why This Matters

LLM API costs are invisible until they aren't. A feature that costs $200/month at launch costs $20,000/month after a growth event. The audit takes two hours. The surprise does not.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.