test-driven-development
Skill24 starsChanged 24 days agoMITView on GitHub
Enforce RED-GREEN-REFACTOR discipline for every implementation task. Use for all new features, bug fixes, and refactors. The core rule — if you didn't watch the test fail, you don't know if it tests the right thing.
190 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- DemonDamon/AgenticXtheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- chrysogonus/power-agentstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ishandutta2007/Awesome-Agent-Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- roundpilot/superpowers-antigravitytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- REPOZY/superpowers-optimizedtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lingyired/status-triotheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use chinese-code-review, chinese-commit-conventions and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Leodorareluctant259Skillchinese-code-review
中文代码审查规范——在保持专业严谨的同时,用符合国内团队文化的方式给出有效反馈
Also in 8 projects that use this
Leodorareluctant259Skillchinese-commit-conventions
中文 Git 提交规范 — 适配国内团队的 commit message 规范和 changelog 自动化
Also in 8 projects that use this
obraSkilldiagnosing-superpowers
Use when a superpowers session went wrong and your human partner wants to know why — repeated work, ignored plans, stumbles, poor results, a skill that didn't fire, "it took too long", "why is it so expensive", "what is it doing" — or wants to build a bug report for the superpowers maintainers, for the current session or a past one identified by id or path, on any harness.
Also in 19 projects that use this
LLl0k0laDSkillusing-agent-skills
Use when starting a session or when you need to discover which skill applies to the current task. This is the meta-skill that governs how all other skills are discovered and invoked.
Also in 39 projects that use this
LLl0k0laDSkillgit-workflow-and-versioning
Use when making any code change. Use when committing, branching, resolving conflicts, or when you need to organize work across multiple parallel streams.
Also in 47 projects that use this
MrCipherSmithSkillconstraint-driven-development
Use when a project needs a persistent, measurable quality bar — starting a project without documented standards, 'set up constraints', or when coverage/perf/a11y thresholds get re-debated per-PR. Produces CONSTRAINTS.md with enforceable numbers, ratchets, and a guard against silent weakening. NOT for throwaway prototypes or a one-off CI setup.
Also in 15 projects that use this
- +3 more from Leodorareluctant259
- +3 more from LLl0k0laD
Other versions190 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 190
- obra/superpowers★ 314ksame name
- NousResearch/hermes-agent★ 262ksame name
- addyosmani/agent-skills★ 114ksame name
- cloudflare/computer★ 9.9ksame name
- jnMetaCode/superpowers-zh★ 8.4ksame name
- openai/plugins★ 7.8ksame name
- farm-fe/farm★ 5.6ksame name
- microsoft/FluidFramework★ 4.9ksame name
- mikeyobrien/ralph-orchestrator★ 3.2ksame name
- crbnos/carbon★ 2.8ksame name
180 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository22 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .claude/rules/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- api-contract-firstSkill
- architecture-auditSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- data-migrationSkill
- dispatching-parallel-agentsSkill
- executing-plansSkill
- finishing-a-development-branchSkill
- five-whysSkill
- incident-responseSkill
- performance-auditSkill
- skill-duplication-auditSkill
- smart-initSkill
- subagent-driven-developmentSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- using-a-teamSkill
- using-git-worktreesSkill
- verification-before-completionSkill
- writing-plansSkill
- writing-skillsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. 0 are common, 12 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 178 edited versions we read keep these.
12
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 20
Write the test FIRST. Not after.
- Distinctive: line 42
If the test passes before you write the implementation: the test is wrong.
- Distinctive: line 46
Write the smallest possible code that makes the test pass.
- Distinctive: line 48
No extra features "while I'm here"
- Distinctive: line 50
No handling of edge cases not yet covered by tests
- Distinctive: line 67
If it still fails: read the error message carefully.
- Distinctive: line 80
No new behavior — only structural improvement
- Distinctive: line 81
If tests go red: undo the last change, understand why
- Distinctive: line 85
After GREEN for the first case, expand coverage:
- Distinctive: line 131
After each feature or bug fix, verify coverage meets the project minimum:
- Distinctive: line 138
If coverage drops below threshold: add tests before moving on.
- Distinctive: line 149
If you catch yourself rationalizing any of these: stop, revert to the last green state, and start the RED phase properly.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 178 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Test-Driven Development
The Core Rule
IF YOU DIDN'T WATCH THE TEST FAIL, YOU DON'T KNOW IF IT TESTS THE RIGHT THING.A green test you've never seen red is not a test — it's a decoration.
The Three Phases (Non-Negotiable)
Phase RED — Write a Failing Test
Write the test FIRST. Not after. Not "I'll add it later." First.
The test must:
- Describe the behavior you want, not the implementation
- Be specific enough to fail for the right reason
- Cover the exact scenario you're about to implement
// RED: Write this BEFORE writing the function
test('returns empty array when no users match the filter', () => {
const result = filterActiveUsers([])
expect(result).toEqual([])
})Run it. Watch it fail.
npm test -- --testPathPattern="user-filter"
# Expected: FAIL (function doesn't exist yet)If the test passes before you write the implementation: the test is wrong. Rewrite it.
Phase GREEN — Write Minimal Implementation
Write the smallest possible code that makes the test pass. Nothing more.
- No extra features "while I'm here"
- No optimization
- No handling of edge cases not yet covered by tests
- Ugly code that passes is better than beautiful code that doesn't exist yet
// GREEN: Minimal implementation that passes the test
function filterActiveUsers(users: User[]): User[] {
return users.filter(u => u.active)
}Run it. Watch it pass.
npm test -- --testPathPattern="user-filter"
# Expected: PASSIf it still fails: read the error message carefully. Fix only what the message tells you.
Phase REFACTOR — Improve Without Breaking
Now clean up. Rename, extract, simplify — while keeping tests green.
# Run tests continuously during refactor
npm test -- --watch --testPathPattern="user-filter"Rules during refactor:
- Tests must stay green at every step
- No new behavior — only structural improvement
- If tests go red: undo the last change, understand why
Adding More Tests (Expand-Contract Pattern)
After GREEN for the first case, expand coverage:
RED → watch new test fail
GREEN → minimal code to pass
RED → add next edge case test
GREEN → handle the edge case
...
REFACTOR → clean up all at once when coverage is completeCover in order:
- Happy path (basic success case)
- Empty / null inputs
- Boundary values (min, max, exactly-at-limit)
- Error paths (invalid input, dependency failure)
- Concurrent / race conditions if applicable
What to Test vs. What NOT to Test
Test:
- Public API surface (exported functions, class methods, HTTP endpoints)
- Business logic decisions
- Data transformations
- Error handling
Do NOT test:
- Implementation details (private functions, internal state)
- Third-party library behavior
- Framework internals
Mocking External Dependencies
External dependencies (database, APIs, file system) must be mocked in unit tests:
// Mock the DB before testing the service
jest.mock('../db/users')
const mockFindUser = db.findUser as jest.MockedFunction<typeof db.findUser>
mockFindUser.mockResolvedValue({ id: '1', name: 'Alice', active: true })Integration tests should hit real dependencies — but unit tests must be fast and isolated.
Coverage Gate
After each feature or bug fix, verify coverage meets the project minimum:
npm run test:coverage
# Required: ≥ 80% branches, functions, lines, statementsIf coverage drops below threshold: add tests before moving on.
TDD Red Flags — You're Doing It Wrong
- Writing the implementation before writing the test
- Running the test only after implementation (never seeing it red)
- Writing tests that test the implementation, not the behavior
- Skipping the refactor phase ("it works, ship it")
- Writing multiple failing tests before making any pass
- Adding edge cases without first making them fail
If you catch yourself rationalizing any of these: stop, revert to the last green state, and start the RED phase properly.
Integration with A Team Workflow
TDD fits into the full workflow:
brainstorming→ spec approvedwriting-plans→ plan with test strategy includedtest-driven-development← you are here, per tasksubagent-driven-development→ each subagent runs TDD internallyverification-before-completion→ final proof before claiming donefinishing-a-development-branch→ branch wrap-up
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

