feature-engineering
Skill3 starsChanged 18 days agoMITView on GitHub
Transforms raw game, player, and goalie data into model-ready features with built-in leakage detection. Use when user asks about feature construction, rolling windows, home/away splits, SOS adjustment, goalie features, Elo as features, or opponent-adjusted metrics. Strictly enforces .shift(1) before any rolling calculation. Do not use for raw data exploration -- see game-lookup or team-analysis. Do not use for understanding hockey metrics -- see hockey-analytics. Do not use for xG feature construction -- see xg-model-building.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 11 edited versions we read keep these.
7
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 56
Your own data: If user provides CSV/JSON:
- Very specific: line 57
Verify required columns: game_date, home_team, away_team, result columns, and stat columns
- Distinctive: line 58
Verify ISO 8601 date format (YYYY-MM-DD)
- Distinctive: line 64
Before building features, establish:
- Distinctive: line 102
Run sensitivity analysis: does the model's walk-forward accuracy change meaningfully when you swap window sizes?
- Distinctive: line 127
Do NOT use simple opponent win% as SOS.
- Distinctive: line 149
Use pre-game Elo (before the game's result updates the rating)
- Distinctive: line 171
All features become single signed values.
- Very specific: line 175
Before handing features to model-building, audit every feature:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 11 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Feature Engineering
Default data tool: PuckAPI (
puckapi-tool). Useget_gamesfor game results (5 credits),get_team_statsfor team-level stats (5 credits),get_goalie_statsfor goalie data (5 credits). For user's own CSV/JSON: skip the tool, work with the file directly -- no credits consumed.
You are an expert in sports feature engineering. Your goal is to construct model-ready features from raw sports data while guaranteeing zero temporal leakage. This is where 80% of beginners fail.
When to Use
- User wants to prepare data for a prediction model
- User asks about rolling windows, moving averages, or recent form metrics
- User asks about home/away splits, rest-day features, or back-to-backs
- User asks about strength-of-schedule adjustment
- User asks about goalie quality features (SV%, GSAA, recent form)
- User asks how to incorporate Elo ratings as model features
- User asks about opponent-adjusted metrics
When NOT to Use
- Raw data exploration (looking up scores, stats) -- see
game-lookuporteam-analysis - Understanding what Corsi, Fenwick, or PDO mean -- see
hockey-analytics - Building expected goals (xG) features specifically -- see
xg-model-building - Training or evaluating the model itself -- see
model-buildingandwalk-forward-validation
Commands Available
| Command | What It Does | Credits |
get_games | Historical game results for rolling calculations | 5 |
get_team_stats | Season and split team stats | 5 |
get_goalie_stats | Starter SV%, GSAA, recent starts | 5 |
get_head_to_head | Head-to-head history for matchup features | 10 |
Commands That Do NOT Exist
| Not Available | Use Instead |
get_team_rolling_stats | Compute rolling stats manually from get_games results |
get_sos | Compute iterative SOS from get_standings + get_team_stats |
get_rest_days | Compute from game date sequences in get_games output |
get_goalie_recent_form | Compute from get_goalie_stats with manual window |
Data Source
PuckAPI (default): Pull historical game log via get_games for the team and date range needed. Sort ascending by date before any calculation.
Your own data: If user provides CSV/JSON:
- Verify required columns:
game_date,home_team,away_team, result columns, and stat columns - Verify ISO 8601 date format (YYYY-MM-DD)
- Flag missing rows -- do not silently drop
- Note: credits are not consumed
Initial Assessment
Before building features, establish:
- What is the prediction target? (win/loss, goal differential, over/under)
- What data is available? (game logs, team stats, player/goalie data)
- What historical depth is available? (seasons of data determines valid window sizes)
How It Works
Step 0: Establish Temporal Ordering
Sort all data ascending by game_date. This is non-negotiable. Every calculation that follows depends on correct order. Verify sort before proceeding.
Step 1: Apply .shift(1) Before ANY Rolling Calculation
The single most important rule in this skill.
For every stat column that will enter a rolling window:
df['stat_shifted'] = df.groupby('team_id')['stat'].shift(1)This ensures game N uses only games 1 through N-1. Without .shift(1), game N includes its own outcome in its own feature -- that is leakage.
Even season-level aggregate stats must be lagged. If you join season stats as a static feature, those season stats include the current game's outcome. Lag them.
Step 2: Rolling Window Statistics
Compute rolling windows at multiple sizes. The "right" window is an empirical question, not a convention.
Required windows to test: 5, 10, 20, 40, 82 games
for window in [5, 10, 20, 40, 82]:
df[f'goals_for_roll{window}'] = (
df.groupby('team_id')['goals_for_shifted']
.transform(lambda x: x.rolling(window, min_periods=window//2).mean())
)Run sensitivity analysis: does the model's walk-forward accuracy change meaningfully when you swap window sizes? If 5-game and 20-game produce similar accuracy, prefer the shorter window (less data required, works earlier in season). Document which window was chosen and why.
Step 3: Home/Away Splits and Rest-Day Features
Compute all features separately for home context and away context. A team's road performance is a different signal than home performance.
Rest-day feature:
df['rest_days'] = df.groupby('team_id')['game_date'].diff().dt.days - 1
df['back_to_back'] = (df['rest_days'] == 0).astype(int)
df['rest_bucket'] = pd.cut(df['rest_days'], bins=[-1, 0, 1, 2, 99],
labels=['b2b', '1day', '2day', '3plus'])Back-to-backs carry measurable performance impact in NHL (PuckCast: ~1.5 percentage point win rate drop). Always include.
Step 4: Strength of Schedule Adjustment (Iterative)
Simple opponent win% is not SOS. It double-counts easy schedules. Use iterative SOS:
- Initialize each team's strength rating as their win%
- Each team's SOS = mean(opponents' current strength ratings)
- Each team's adjusted rating = f(own record, SOS)
- Repeat steps 2-3 until ratings converge (typically 10-20 iterations)
Do NOT use simple opponent win% as SOS. It underestimates the difficulty of facing strong opponents who themselves faced strong opponents.
Pull opponent records via get_standings. Recompute per-fold in walk-forward validation -- never use full-season SOS as a feature (that leaks final standings into early-season predictions).
Step 5: Goalie Quality Features
Goalie variance is the single largest source of randomness in NHL game outcomes. Features:
- Starter SV% (season to date, lagged): from
get_goalie_stats - Recent form SV% (last 5 starts, lagged): rolling on starts, not games
- GSAA (Goals Saved Above Average) (season to date, lagged): measures goalie quality net of shot quality
- Confirmed starter flag: 1 if starter announced, 0 if uncertain
# GSAA formula: (league_avg_sv_pct - goalie_sv_pct) * shots_faced_against
# Negative GSAA = goalie is below average (worse than expected)Step 6: Elo Ratings as Features
Reference elo-engineering skill for Elo calculation details. As a feature input:
- Use pre-game Elo (before the game's result updates the rating)
- Elo difference (home_elo - away_elo) is often more predictive than raw Elo values
- Elo captures recent form implicitly -- no need to separately include win streak if Elo is in the model
Step 7: Opponent-Adjusted Metrics
Raw goals-for is partially a function of opponent quality. Subtract opponent average:
df['adj_goals_for'] = df['goals_for_roll10'] - df['opp_goals_against_roll10']This isolates the team's contribution from the matchup context. PuckCast uses home-minus-away differences for all 158 features -- this encodes opponent context directly.
Step 8: Construct Home-Minus-Away Differences
For matchup prediction, compute the difference between home team feature and away team feature:
df['goal_diff_feature'] = df['home_goals_for_roll10'] - df['away_goals_for_roll10']All features become single signed values. This reduces dimensionality by half and encodes matchup context directly. PuckCast proved this representation across 158 features.
Step 9: Leakage Audit
Before handing features to model-building, audit every feature:
- Does it use data from the game being predicted? -> Leakage
- Does it use data from after the game being predicted? -> Leakage
- Was
.shift(1)applied before any rolling calculation? -> If no, leakage - Were season-level stats lagged? -> If no, leakage
See feature-catalog.md for the full recommended feature list with leakage risk ratings.
Credit Usage
| Operation | Credits | Notes |
get_games per season | 5 | Pull full season game log |
get_team_stats | 5 | Season splits per team |
get_goalie_stats | 5 | Per goalie per season |
| Full NHL season feature build | ~475 | 32 teams * 5 (stats) + 32 * 5 (goalies) + games |
Anti-patterns
| Rationalization | Why It's Wrong | Do This Instead |
| "k-fold is fine for feature selection" | k-fold on time series leaks future folds into training, inflating feature importance scores by 5-15% | Use walk-forward fold structure for all feature selection |
| "40-game window is standard" | 40 is arbitrary; the right window depends on your data | Test 5/10/20/40/82 windows, report sensitivity, pick empirically |
| "Elo is redundant with rolling win%" | Elo updates after every game and weights recent games more; win% is equally weighted across the season | Include Elo; it captures momentum that win% misses |
| "Don't need .shift(1) for season-level stats" | Season stats include the current game's outcome; that is leakage | Lag every stat, including season-level aggregates |
| "I'll add shift(1) at the end" | Rolling windows applied before shift include game N in game N's feature | Shift first, then roll. Order is not flexible. |
| "Opponent win% is a fine SOS proxy" | Simple opponent win% double-counts easy schedules | Use iterative SOS -- run convergence loop on opponent ratings |
| "More features can't hurt" | More features increase overfitting risk in small sports datasets | Use feature importance from walk-forward folds to prune aggressively |
| "I'll just use this season's stats for the whole season" | Future games in the season leak into early-season features | Rebuild SOS and aggregate stats per fold in walk-forward |
Output Format
Feature engineering produces:
- Feature matrix (
X): rows = games, columns = home-minus-away feature differences. All numeric. No nulls (handle early-season NaN with fill strategy: season average or 0 with a "sufficient data" flag column). - Target vector (
y): 1 = home win, 0 = away win. For totals modeling: total goals. - Game index: game_id and game_date for temporal sorting in walk-forward splits.
- Feature audit log: each feature name, window size, shift applied (Y/N), leakage risk (from catalog).
Hand this output directly to walk-forward-validation or model-building.
What to Do Next
| What You Found | Next Action | Skill |
| Features built, need to evaluate a model | Validate with temporal splits | walk-forward-validation |
| Features built, ready to train | Train with walk-forward methodology baked in | model-building |
| Suspect a feature has leakage | Audit shift/roll order, check leakage risk in catalog | feature-engineering (re-run Step 9) |
| Want to add Elo as a feature | Build Elo ratings first | elo-engineering |
| Want expected goals features | xG requires shot-level data and a separate process | xg-model-building |
| Features look good, want to backtest a strategy | Backtesting adds bankroll simulation on top | backtesting |
Other versions13 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 13
- skforecast/skforecast★ 1.5ksame name
- agiprolabs/claude-trading-skills★ 366same name
- brainbytes-dev/everything-claude-trading★ 16same name
- ffsshhttiikk/opencode-agents-skills★ 2same name
- gmanch94/claude-code-aidlc-template★ 2same name
- Harrypatria/data-mining-ml★ 2same name
- Lu1sDV/skillsmd★ 2same name
- noahowsh/acesapi-mcp★ 1same name
- berriosb/data-analytics-agents★ 0same name
- IngAs8/ClaudeSkill★ 0same name
3 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use mean-reversion and position-sizing.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
agiprolabsSkillmean-reversion
Mean-reversion strategy tools including Hurst exponent, half-life estimation, z-score signals, ADF testing, and Ornstein-Uhlenbeck modeling
Also in 3 projects that use this
Bhala-SrinivashSkillposition-sizing
Calculate optimal position sizes for NSE/BSE equity trades using fixed fractional, ATR-based, and Kelly criterion methods. Includes portfolio constraints and leverage adjustments.
Also in 3 projects that use this
In this repository28 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- ai-hockey-workflowSkill
- backtestingSkill
- bet-trackerSkill
- daily-cardSkill
- data-pipelineSkill
- dispatchSkill
- edge-detectionSkill
- elo-engineeringSkill
- game-lookupSkill
- game-previewSkill
- goalie-analysisSkill
- hockey-analyticsSkill
- model-buildingSkill
- nl-to-querySkill
- odds-analysisSkill
- odds-explorerSkill
- player-scoutingSkill
- playoff-simulationSkill
- probability-calibrationSkill
- prop-modelingSkill
- puckapi-toolSkill
- team-analysisSkill
- totals-modelingSkill
- visualizationSkill
- walk-forward-validationSkill
- war-gar-decompositionSkill
- xg-model-buildingSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

