agentleFS
PromptPartnerPromptPartner/agentsmith/skills/verify/SKILL.md

verify

Skill173 starsChanged 17 days agoMITView on GitHub

Answer "is this shippable / done?" with evidence before a commit or PR — fires on "verify", "is this done", "ready to ship?", pre-commit or pre-PR. Part of the Agentsmith harness; runs the project's verify phases and never claims "passing" without showing the output (R5).

188 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use instinct-export, instinct-import and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • TheKREATORSSkill

    instinct-export

    Export instincts from project/global scope to a file

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • TheKREATORSSkill

    instinct-import

    Import instincts from file or URL into project/global scope

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • AviadPSkill

    risk-assess

    Assess the risk and blast radius of a proposed code change before implementing it. Evaluates CI impact, framework-wide vs localized scope, rollback path, and identifies blindspots. Use when user says "what's the risk", "is this safe", "assess the impact", "risk assess", "blast radius", or before applying framework-wide or CI-affecting changes. Do NOT use for code quality review (use code-quality) or plan validation (use design-validator).

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • diego-tobalinaSkill

    build-fix

    Fix build and compilation errors systematically. Run when build fails.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • AaravChadhaSkill

    secure

    Security review with a confidence gate - a finding exists only with a concrete exploit scenario and a high/medium/low confidence rating; everything else goes to a worth-hardening list, never inflated. Sweeps five surfaces: auth gates, secrets hygiene, injection and unsafe sinks, unsafe deserialization/crypto/transport, and LLM tool-use trust boundaries. Reports only, never fixes. Use when the user asks for a security review or to check vulnerabilities, secrets, or auth.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • ArvorCoSkill

    specify

    Create feature specification from natural language description. Use when starting a new feature or creating a spec. Triggers on: create spec, specify feature, new feature spec.

    Also in 10 projects that use this

  • +1 more from TheKREATORS

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 167 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Run agentsmith verify (or the installed-project shim .agentsmith/agentsmith verify on macOS/Linux and .agentsmith\\agentsmith.cmd verify on …

    line 21
  2. Distinctive:

    Run the obvious checks for this project directly and show their output: build, test, lint, link/render check, a dry-run.

    line 41
  3. Very specific:

    If nothing is wired yet, propose the phases this project needs and offer to write .harness/verify.conf — but still run the checks by hand …

    line 44

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 167 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Verify — evidence before "done"

"Verified" is not a feeling; it's output you can point at. Never claim passing without showing it (R5 + verification-before-completion).

When this fires

"verify" / "is this done / shippable / ready to merge?" / just before a commit or PR.

Runtime neutrality

The verification runner and evidence standard are client-neutral. Never infer the active agent from this skill's install path: portable canonical content may be copied into a required client adapter such as .claude/skills. Use canonical AGENTS.md when an instruction is relevant.

Fast path — if the Agentsmith CLI is available

  1. Run agentsmith verify (or the installed-project shim .agentsmith/agentsmith verify on macOS/Linux and .agentsmith\\agentsmith.cmd verify on Windows). It runs every phase in .harness/verify.conf and stops at the first failure). --list shows the phases; --only <tag> iterates just one. Add --record <directory> --tree-class <clean-clone|disposable-fixture|linked-worktree|operator-worktree> when deterministic command evidence needs a durable local receipt. The explicit class keeps a dirty operator tree from masquerading as clean-checkout evidence; clean-clone refuses a dirty tree. The destination must be new; relative paths resolve from the project target. Record mode redacts secret-shaped console and sidecar output before either is emitted.
  2. On a failure: read the label + command it printed, explain in plain language what broke, and point at that phase's line in .harness/verify.conf to fix or refine.
  3. Report the actual pass/fail output — not a summary of intent.

The v1 receipt covers deterministic commands only. Keep screenshots, videos, manual assertions, published results, and real runtime or visual checks as separately referenced artifacts. A green receipt does not satisfy an end-to-end gate that requires those observations.

Fallback — no runner or no conf

  1. Say so plainly. With the CLI but no conf, agentsmith verify discover --save <plan> proposes phases from the project; review the plan, then agentsmith verify apply --plan <plan>.
  2. Run the obvious checks for this project directly and show their output: build, test, lint, link/render check, a dry-run. For non-code work, "verify" = open the artifact and confirm it renders / the numbers reconcile / the links resolve.
  3. If nothing is wired yet, propose the phases this project needs and offer to write .harness/verify.conf — but still run the checks by hand this time.

Output you can quote as proof

  • Run it raw. An output-rewriting hook (a token-saving shell wrapper on Bash, for example) can summarise, empty or re-code test, lint, search and git output, and report its own exit status. Run any command whose output you quote through the wrapper's bypass (for rtk: rtk proxy <command>). agentsmith doctor reports such hooks.
  • Absence needs an untruncated, count-based check. "No match" from a truncated or summarised search is not proof that something is absent.
  • CI is green when pending == 0 and failing == 0 on the matching head SHA, read from step conclusions. A cancelled, missing or not-yet-registered check is not green; don't wait for a fixed number of checks.

Report

State each check and its evidence: "build ok, 42 tests green, lint clean" — with the output, not "should pass". Anything skipped is "deferred: reason", never silence.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.