verify
Skill173 starsChanged 17 days agoMITView on GitHub
Answer "is this shippable / done?" with evidence before a commit or PR — fires on "verify", "is this done", "ready to ship?", pre-commit or pre-PR. Part of the Agentsmith harness; runs the project's verify phases and never claims "passing" without showing the output (R5).
188 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Doist/todoist-aitheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- udecode/better-convextheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- pytorch/heliontheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- amir20/dozzletheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Doist/todoist-clitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use instinct-export, instinct-import and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
TheKREATORSSkillinstinct-export
Export instincts from project/global scope to a file
Also in 3 projects that use this
TheKREATORSSkillinstinct-import
Import instincts from file or URL into project/global scope
Also in 3 projects that use this
AviadPSkillrisk-assess
Assess the risk and blast radius of a proposed code change before implementing it. Evaluates CI impact, framework-wide vs localized scope, rollback path, and identifies blindspots. Use when user says "what's the risk", "is this safe", "assess the impact", "risk assess", "blast radius", or before applying framework-wide or CI-affecting changes. Do NOT use for code quality review (use code-quality) or plan validation (use design-validator).
Also in 3 projects that use this
diego-tobalinaSkillbuild-fix
Fix build and compilation errors systematically. Run when build fails.
Also in 6 projects that use this
AaravChadhaSkillsecure
Security review with a confidence gate - a finding exists only with a concrete exploit scenario and a high/medium/low confidence rating; everything else goes to a worth-hardening list, never inflated. Sweeps five surfaces: auth gates, secrets hygiene, injection and unsafe sinks, unsafe deserialization/crypto/transport, and LLM tool-use trust boundaries. Reports only, never fixes. Use when the user asks for a security review or to check vulnerabilities, secrets, or auth.
Also in 3 projects that use this
ArvorCoSkillspecify
Create feature specification from natural language description. Use when starting a new feature or creating a spec. Triggers on: create spec, specify feature, new feature spec.
Also in 10 projects that use this
- +1 more from TheKREATORS
Other versions188 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 188
- react/react★ 252ksame name
- facebook/react★ 252ksame name
- garrytan/gstack★ 141ksame name
- oven-sh/bun★ 97ksame name
- anthropics/financial-services★ 41ksame name
- anthropics/financial-services-plugins★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphus★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode★ 41ksame name
- anthropics/claude-quickstarts★ 19ksame name
- NVIDIA-NeMo/Speech★ 19ksame name
178 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- autonomous-runSkill
- example-skillSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- handoffSkill
- harness-doctorSkill
- harness-helpSkill
- new-feedbackSkill
- new-researchSkill
- wayfinderSkill
- writing-rulesSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 167 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 21
Run agentsmith verify (or the installed-project shim .agentsmith/agentsmith verify on macOS/Linux and .agentsmith\\agentsmith.cmd verify on …
- Distinctive: line 41
Run the obvious checks for this project directly and show their output: build, test, lint, link/render check, a dry-run.
- Very specific: line 44
If nothing is wired yet, propose the phases this project needs and offer to write .harness/verify.conf — but still run the checks by hand …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 167 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Verify — evidence before "done"
"Verified" is not a feeling; it's output you can point at. Never claim passing without showing it (R5 + verification-before-completion).
When this fires
"verify" / "is this done / shippable / ready to merge?" / just before a commit or PR.
Runtime neutrality
The verification runner and evidence standard are client-neutral. Never infer the active agent
from this skill's install path: portable canonical content may be copied into a required client
adapter such as .claude/skills. Use canonical AGENTS.md when an instruction is relevant.
Fast path — if the Agentsmith CLI is available
- Run
agentsmith verify(or the installed-project shim.agentsmith/agentsmith verifyon macOS/Linux and.agentsmith\\agentsmith.cmd verifyon Windows). It runs every phase in.harness/verify.confand stops at the first failure).--listshows the phases;--only <tag>iterates just one. Add--record <directory> --tree-class <clean-clone|disposable-fixture|linked-worktree|operator-worktree>when deterministic command evidence needs a durable local receipt. The explicit class keeps a dirty operator tree from masquerading as clean-checkout evidence;clean-clonerefuses a dirty tree. The destination must be new; relative paths resolve from the project target. Record mode redacts secret-shaped console and sidecar output before either is emitted. - On a failure: read the label + command it printed, explain in plain language what broke, and
point at that phase's line in
.harness/verify.confto fix or refine. - Report the actual pass/fail output — not a summary of intent.
The v1 receipt covers deterministic commands only. Keep screenshots, videos, manual assertions, published results, and real runtime or visual checks as separately referenced artifacts. A green receipt does not satisfy an end-to-end gate that requires those observations.
Fallback — no runner or no conf
- Say so plainly. With the CLI but no conf,
agentsmith verify discover --save <plan>proposes phases from the project; review the plan, thenagentsmith verify apply --plan <plan>. - Run the obvious checks for this project directly and show their output: build, test, lint, link/render check, a dry-run. For non-code work, "verify" = open the artifact and confirm it renders / the numbers reconcile / the links resolve.
- If nothing is wired yet, propose the phases this project needs and offer to write
.harness/verify.conf— but still run the checks by hand this time.
Output you can quote as proof
- Run it raw. An output-rewriting hook (a token-saving shell wrapper on Bash, for example)
can summarise, empty or re-code test, lint, search and git output, and report its own exit
status. Run any command whose output you quote through the wrapper's bypass (for
rtk:rtk proxy <command>).agentsmith doctorreports such hooks. - Absence needs an untruncated, count-based check. "No match" from a truncated or summarised search is not proof that something is absent.
- CI is green when pending == 0 and failing == 0 on the matching head SHA, read from step conclusions. A cancelled, missing or not-yet-registered check is not green; don't wait for a fixed number of checks.
Report
State each check and its evidence: "build ok, 42 tests green, lint clean" — with the output, not "should pass". Anything skipped is "deferred: reason", never silence.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

