AGENT-GLOBAL-BASE / telescope
CLAUDE.md2 starsChanged 2 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Cross-department pointer for the workspace's three department research archives, plus the home for research that is genuinely workspace-wide in scope. Read this before documenting any investigation, or before deciding which department's telescope a new investigation belongs in. Research direction is documented separately per department, each with its own dedicated archive: This folder is not a general document repository. It holds only: Applied at the time a research investigation is commissioned: 1. Default: file it under the requesting or most-affected department's…
In this repository27 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- academic-neural-unit-00/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- company/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- core-component-00/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- studio/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- activate-org-agentSkill
- android-engineeringSkill
- audio-engineeringSkill
- backend-engineeringSkill
- cross-platform-engineeringSkill
- cyberspace-securitySkill
- data-analyticsSkill
- engineeringSkill
- frontend-engineeringSkill
- game-developmentSkill
- ios-engineeringSkill
- legalSkill
- live-operationsSkill
- llm-engineeringSkill
- localizationSkill
- product-designSkill
- product-managementSkill
- quality-assuranceSkill
- recruitmentSkill
- technology-strategySkill
- visual-arts-and-animationSkill
The file
We split this CLAUDE.md into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 33
Cross-cutting exception: if the investigation's findings affect workspace-wide governance or shared configuration used by every department …
- Distinctive: line 37
When a cross-cutting report is filed here, cross-link it from any department instance's index it materially concerns, so it isn't siloed …
- Very specific: line 59
Only create a report directly in this folder if it meets the cross-cutting exception above.
- Very specific: line 62
Create a new folder: YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>/
- Distinctive: line 65
Add an entry to README.md (the cross-department index) and cross-link from any department index it concerns
- Very specific: line 103
Every report lives in a YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>/ folder containing research-report.md.
- Distinctive: line 104
Every report is indexed in its instance's README.md.
- Distinctive: line 105
Use the shared template — do not invent alternative formats.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 26,980 CLAUDE.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
telescope/ — Cross-Department Research Index
Cross-department pointer for the workspace's three department research archives, plus the home for research that is genuinely workspace-wide in scope. Read this before documenting any investigation, or before deciding which department's telescope a new investigation belongs in.
What This Is
Research direction is documented separately per department, each with its own dedicated archive:
| Instance | Scope | Owner |
core-component-00/telescope/ | Engineering + cutting-edge LLM research | Dr. Elias Vance, Lab Director |
company/telescope/ | Product-oriented research | Marcus Tran-Yoshida, CPO |
studio/casual-games/telescope/ | Game-design / competitive / live-ops / market research | Marcus Vogel, Studio Director |
telescope/ (this folder) | Cross-department index + workspace-wide governance research | Organizer / CEO |
This folder is not a general document repository. It holds only:
- This index/pointer documentation
- Research that is genuinely cross-cutting — see the classification rule below
- The canonical
template/(each department instance also keeps its own copy)
Classification Rule — Where Does a New Investigation Go?
Applied at the time a research investigation is commissioned:
- Default: file it under the requesting or most-affected department's instance.
- Cross-cutting exception: if the investigation's findings affect workspace-wide governance
or shared configuration used by every department (e.g.
.claude/config, a workspace-wide rule likemcp-governance.md, or cross-cutting infrastructure no single department owns), it stays here at the workspace root instead. - When a cross-cutting report is filed here, cross-link it from any department instance's index it materially concerns, so it isn't siloed from departments that rely on its findings.
Directory Structure
telescope/
├── README.md ← Cross-department index — see this for the full picture
└── template/ ← Canonical report template (each department instance mirrors this)
├── research-report.md
└── qa-document.mdA cross-cutting investigation gets its own YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>/ folder under this root per the
rule above.
Creating a New Research Report Here
Only create a report directly in this folder if it meets the cross-cutting exception above.
Otherwise, go to the relevant department's telescope/ instance and follow its CLAUDE.md.
- Create a new folder:
YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>/ - Copy the template:
template/research-report.md→YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>/research-report.md - Complete the report in the new folder
- Add an entry to
README.md(the cross-department index) and cross-link from any department index it concerns
Telescope Conventions
These rules apply to every telescope instance — root and all three departments.
Report Shape — two canonical forms
- Simple — a single
research-report.md(+ optionalqa-document.md) at the investigation folder root. Nothing else. Use this for any self-contained investigation. - Programme — a top-level
research-report.md(required; the consolidated synthesis) and optionalqa-document.md, plus exactly onesupporting/folder holding everything ancillary: diagrams, deployment/migration plans, sub-investigation reports, implementation plans. No other subfolder name is permitted at the investigation root. A sub-investigation's own report still lives atsupporting/<sub-slug>/research-report.md, and stays fully template-conformant. No inventing new folder names per report.
Status Lifecycle — four states
In Progress / Complete / Superseded / Abandoned. An investigation's Status must be
updated in both its own research-report.md metadata table and its instance README.md
index entry in the same commit — the README is the authoritative "what's active" view; do not
rely on opening every folder to find out. Any In Progress investigation untouched for 90+ days
must be reviewed by the instance owner (Lab Director / CPO / Studio Director-or-delegate) and
reclassified as Complete, Abandoned, or recommitted with a new note — it may not sit silently
as "active" indefinitely.
No physical archive//running/ subfolders. Status-based physical reorganization forces a
file move on every status change, which fights the append-only rule below and churns git history
without improving retrieval — the README Status column already does this job.
Rules (unchanged across all telescope instances)
- Every report lives in a
YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>/folder containingresearch-report.md. - Every report is indexed in its instance's
README.md. - Use the shared template — do not invent alternative formats.
- This archive is append-oriented. Do not edit published reports except to correct factual errors (note the correction with a date in the report's metadata), and do not delete completed research reports without explicit direction from the User.
- Template skeleton (Metadata, Executive Summary, Investigation Scope, Research Questions, Methodology, Findings, Analysis, Recommendations, References, optional Appendices/Research Log/Open Questions) is fixed across all instances for citation and ADR-linkage consistency. Departments may add optional domain-specific addenda without forking the core structure.
Related Documentation
| Document | Purpose |
telescope/README.md | Full cross-department index |
core-component-00/telescope/CLAUDE.md | Lab research archive charter |
company/telescope/CLAUDE.md | Company research archive charter |
studio/casual-games/telescope/CLAUDE.md | Studio research archive charter |
.claude/rules/mcp-governance.md | Workspace MCP governance policy |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

