agentleFS
PeiiiiPeiiii/nextclaw/skills/impeccable/SKILL.md

impeccable

Skill263 starsChanged 35 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when the user wants distinctive, production-grade frontend design, anti-generic AI aesthetics, UX critique, technical UI audits, or final polish through bundled Impeccable references and an optional upstream detector CLI.

  • Installs packages

168 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use cloud-architecture-diagram, shelra-workspace-quality and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • MicrosoftSkill

    cloud-architecture-diagram

    Create, edit, or troubleshoot Azure-first architecture diagrams as editable draw.io files, with AWS and multicloud topology support and identity, API, and CI/CD flow diagrams. Use for architecture visualization, network boundaries, interaction flows, or missing diagram icons. Not for deploying infrastructure, live cloud discovery, security certification, or unrelated charts.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • ShelraSkill

    shelra-workspace-quality

    Audit or refine ShelraCode's main OpenTUI coding workspace when chat activity, live status, plan/context sidebar, agent visibility, or verification UX must match a supplied visual specification. Do not use for onboarding, settings, or unrelated screens.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • owshq-mecSkill

    layout

    Improve layout, spacing, and visual rhythm. Fixes monotonous grids, inconsistent spacing, and weak visual hierarchy. Use when the user mentions layout feeling off, spacing issues, visual hierarchy, crowded UI, alignment problems, or wanting better composition.

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • FldicoahkiinSkill

    contribute-catalog

    Author a new HyperFrames registry block (caption style, VFX block, transition, lower third) or component (text effect, overlay, snippet) and ship it as an upstream PR to the hyperframes repo. Use ONLY when the user wants to CONTRIBUTE to the public catalog — for in-project caption/transition authoring use the `hyperframes` skill, for installing existing registry items use the `hyperframes-registry` skill.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • HK-hubSkill

    overdrive

    Pushes interfaces past conventional limits with technically ambitious implementations — shaders, spring physics, scroll-driven reveals, 60fps animations. Use when the user wants to wow, impress, go all-out, or make something that feels extraordinary.

    Also in 11 projects that use this

  • HK-hubSkill

    bolder

    Amplify safe or boring designs to make them more visually interesting and stimulating. Increases impact while maintaining usability. Use when the user says the design looks bland, generic, too safe, lacks personality, or wants more visual impact and character.

    Also in 12 projects that use this

  • +3 more from HK-hub

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

30 rules. 0 are common, 21 are distinctive, and 9 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 167 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 21

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 9

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use this skill when the user wants stronger frontend design quality inside NextClaw.

    line 10
  2. Very specific:

    Do not present third-party detector output as built-in NextClaw capability.

    line 26
  3. Distinctive:

    Do not pretend the detector is ready when it is not.

    line 27
  4. Distinctive:

    Always distinguish these paths:

    line 51
  5. Distinctive:

    When this skill triggers, follow this order.

    line 66
  6. Distinctive:

    If any of these checks fail, the skill is not correctly installed in the current workspace.

    line 78
  7. Distinctive:

    Before doing meaningful design work, confirm these minimum inputs:

    line 95
  8. Distinctive:

    Do not infer these from code alone.

    line 101
  9. Very specific:

    If the user already supplied them in the current conversation, proceed.

    line 103
  10. Very specific:

    If not, ask the smallest number of targeted questions needed to unblock the work.

    line 104
  11. Very specific:

    If the user wants this context persisted for future sessions, ask before writing a local .impeccable.md.

    line 105
  12. Distinctive:

    Prefer the smallest relevant asset instead of reading everything:

    line 109
  13. Distinctive:

    Only use the upstream detector when the user wants automated anti-pattern evidence, or when audit or critique would materially benefit from …

    line 149
  14. Very specific:

    If impeccable is already installed, verify it with:

    line 161
  15. Distinctive:

    If the CLI is missing:

    line 167
  16. Distinctive:

    keep going with the bundled references when the user only needs design guidance,

    line 170
  17. Very specific:

    ask before any install or download step because npm install -g impeccable or npx impeccable ...

    line 171
  18. Distinctive:

    If the detector is available, prefer a read-only smoke before a large scan:

    line 173
  19. Very specific:

    Use --fast for large directories.

    line 179
  20. Distinctive:

    If the issue sounds implementation-heavy rather than experiential, prefer:

    line 201
  21. Distinctive:

    Do not start real design work until the minimum design context is known.

    line 238
  22. Distinctive:

    Prefer shaping before large greenfield frontend work.

    line 239
  23. Distinctive:

    Prefer read-only critique or audit before sweeping rewrites when the problem is still unclear.

    line 241
  24. Very specific:

    Ask before writing .impeccable.md or installing/downloading the detector runtime.

    line 242
  25. Distinctive:

    Treat detector findings as evidence, not unquestionable truth.

    line 243
  26. Distinctive:

    Keep recommendations grounded in the user's product, not a stock aesthetic template.

    line 245
  27. Distinctive:

    Ask the smallest targeted question set needed to recover the audience, use case, and tone.

    line 252
  28. Distinctive:

    Follow the stricter local system.

    line 262
  29. Distinctive:

    Use Impeccable as a quality and taste layer, not as authority to override established product rules.

    line 263
  30. Distinctive:

    Keep the detector result as a signal, but prioritize verified user impact and visual judgment.

    line 268

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 167 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Impeccable

Overview

Use this skill when the user wants stronger frontend design quality inside NextClaw.

This marketplace skill adapts the upstream pbakaus/impeccable project into a single installable NextClaw skill package with:

  • one top-level workflow router,
  • bundled local references for typography, color and contrast, layout, motion, interaction, responsive design, and UX writing,
  • bundled workflow guides for shaping, crafting, critique, audit, polish, and design-system extraction,
  • and an optional upstream impeccable detector CLI for deterministic anti-pattern scans.

Be explicit about the boundary:

  • This skill owns design-context gating, workflow selection, expectation-setting, and detector readiness guidance.
  • The bundled local references own the detailed design vocabulary.
  • The optional upstream impeccable CLI owns deterministic anti-pattern detection.
  • NextClaw, the current repository rules, and the active runtime own actual implementation and execution.

Do not present third-party detector output as built-in NextClaw capability. Do not pretend the detector is ready when it is not.

What This Skill Covers

  • design context setup before UI work,
  • feature shaping before code is written,
  • distinctive frontend implementation guidance that avoids generic AI aesthetics,
  • focused passes on typography, color, layout, motion, interaction, responsive behavior, and microcopy,
  • design critique and technical UI audit,
  • final polish before shipping,
  • design-system extraction from repeated patterns,
  • optional detector-assisted anti-pattern scans when the upstream CLI is available.

What This Skill Does Not Cover

  • inferring the real audience or brand tone purely from code,
  • silently installing npm packages or downloading the detector runtime,
  • claiming detector-based evidence when Node/npm or the CLI are unavailable,
  • overriding a stricter local design system or project rulebook,
  • turning every design request into the same maximalist or marketing-style aesthetic,
  • pretending that an upstream multi-command ecosystem maps one-to-one onto NextClaw command surfaces.

Install Boundary

Always distinguish these paths:

  • NextClaw marketplace install: nextclaw skills install impeccable
  • Installed NextClaw skill assets: <workspace>/skills/impeccable/
  • Optional upstream detector runtime: npm install -g impeccable
  • Upstream standalone bundles for other tools: https://github.com/pbakaus/impeccable

Installing the marketplace skill does not install the upstream detector automatically.

Deterministic First-Use Workflow

When this skill triggers, follow this order.

Step 0: Verify the bundled assets exist

Check:

test -f skills/impeccable/SKILL.md
test -f skills/impeccable/references/typography.md
test -f skills/impeccable/workflows/critique.md

If any of these checks fail, the skill is not correctly installed in the current workspace.

Step 1: Classify the user's need

Choose the smallest matching workflow:

  • design context setup,
  • feature shaping,
  • build or redesign,
  • design critique,
  • technical audit,
  • final polish,
  • design-system extraction,
  • focused pass: typography, color, layout, motion, interaction, responsive behavior, or UX copy.

Step 2: Gate on design context before real design work

Before doing meaningful design work, confirm these minimum inputs:

  • target audience,
  • primary use cases or jobs to be done,
  • brand personality or interface tone.

Do not infer these from code alone.

If the user already supplied them in the current conversation, proceed. If not, ask the smallest number of targeted questions needed to unblock the work. If the user wants this context persisted for future sessions, ask before writing a local .impeccable.md.

Step 3: Load only the matching local workflow

Prefer the smallest relevant asset instead of reading everything:

  • feature shaping: workflows/shape.md
  • build or redesign: workflows/craft.md
  • design critique: workflows/critique.md
  • technical audit: workflows/audit.md
  • final polish: workflows/polish.md
  • design-system extraction: workflows/extract.md

For focused passes, load only the relevant references:

  • typography: references/typography.md
  • color and contrast: references/color-and-contrast.md
  • layout and spacing: references/spatial-design.md
  • motion: references/motion-design.md
  • interaction: references/interaction-design.md
  • responsive behavior: references/responsive-design.md
  • UX writing: references/ux-writing.md

For critique scoring or persona framing, also load:

  • references/critique-cognitive-load.md
  • references/critique-heuristics-scoring.md
  • references/critique-personas.md

Step 4: Treat the detector CLI as optional runtime, not a default assumption

Only use the upstream detector when the user wants automated anti-pattern evidence, or when audit or critique would materially benefit from it.

First verify runtime prerequisites:

command -v node
node --version
command -v npm
command -v npx
command -v impeccable

If impeccable is already installed, verify it with:

impeccable --help

If the CLI is missing:

  • explain that the bundled NextClaw skill is ready, but the optional detector runtime is not,
  • keep going with the bundled references when the user only needs design guidance,
  • ask before any install or download step because npm install -g impeccable or npx impeccable ... changes local machine state.

If the detector is available, prefer a read-only smoke before a large scan:

impeccable detect --fast --json <target>

Use --fast for large directories. Narrow scope before scanning very large repos.

Workflow Routing Guidance

New feature or major redesign

Start with:

  • workflows/shape.md

Then continue with:

  • workflows/craft.md

Load the minimum supporting references based on the brief.

Existing UI needs feedback

Use:

  • workflows/critique.md

If the issue sounds implementation-heavy rather than experiential, prefer:

  • workflows/audit.md

Existing UI is close but not finished

Use:

  • workflows/polish.md

Existing product has repeated patterns that should become a design system

Use:

  • workflows/extract.md

Focused fixes without a full redesign

Choose the smallest relevant reference and stay scoped:

  • typography issue only: references/typography.md
  • color or contrast issue only: references/color-and-contrast.md
  • spacing or layout issue only: references/spatial-design.md
  • motion or transition issue only: references/motion-design.md
  • form, state, or affordance issue only: references/interaction-design.md
  • mobile or responsive issue only: references/responsive-design.md
  • unclear labels, errors, or empty states: references/ux-writing.md

Safe Usage Rules

  • Do not start real design work until the minimum design context is known.
  • Prefer shaping before large greenfield frontend work.
  • Preserve the existing design system when the user is working within an established product.
  • Prefer read-only critique or audit before sweeping rewrites when the problem is still unclear.
  • Ask before writing .impeccable.md or installing/downloading the detector runtime.
  • Treat detector findings as evidence, not unquestionable truth; false positives must be called out.
  • Be honest when the result still feels generic or AI-generated.
  • Keep recommendations grounded in the user's product, not a stock aesthetic template.

Troubleshooting

Design context is missing

  • Stop guessing.
  • Ask the smallest targeted question set needed to recover the audience, use case, and tone.

The user wants critique or audit, but the detector CLI is unavailable

  • Continue with the bundled critique or audit workflow.
  • Be explicit that the result is expert review without detector evidence.
  • Offer the optional detector install path only if the user wants it.

The current repo already has a stricter design system

  • Follow the stricter local system.
  • Use Impeccable as a quality and taste layer, not as authority to override established product rules.

Detector output conflicts with good product judgment

  • Say so plainly.
  • Keep the detector result as a signal, but prioritize verified user impact and visual judgment.

Success Criteria

This skill is working correctly when:

  • design work starts from explicit audience, use case, and tone rather than guesswork,
  • the smallest relevant workflow or reference is loaded,
  • the resulting interface avoids obvious generic AI aesthetics,
  • critique and audit outputs are specific, prioritized, and actionable,
  • optional detector scans are only used when their runtime is actually ready,
  • and the skill raises the design bar without hiding setup reality.

Attribution

This skill adapts the upstream pbakaus/impeccable project for the NextClaw marketplace.

Source mapping is documented in references/SOURCES.md.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.