sdd-verify
Skill10 starsChanged 20 days agoMITView on GitHub
Spec compliance verification for spec-driven development
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
10
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 9
Verify that the implementation matches the specification exactly.
- Distinctive: line 14
Set up the verification matrix: Create a checklist from the spec.
- Distinctive: line 20
Verify interface contracts: Check each function signature and behavior.
- Distinctive: line 27
Verify success criteria: Test each acceptance criterion.
- Distinctive: line 28
Write a test for each "Given/When/Then" in the spec if not already present
- Distinctive: line 29
Run the tests; each must pass
- Distinctive: line 30
If a criterion has no test, flag it as untested
- Distinctive: line 32
Verify edge case behavior: Test the edge case table.
- Distinctive: line 35
If any edge case is not tested, write a test and run it
- Distinctive: line 37
Verify non-functional requirements: Check constraints.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
SDD Verify Skill
Verify that the implementation matches the specification exactly. This is the final phase of the SDD pipeline: a systematic compliance check.
Steps
- Set up the verification matrix: Create a checklist from the spec.
- List every interface contract from the spec
- List every success criterion
- List every edge case behavior
- List every non-functional requirement
- Verify interface contracts: Check each function signature and behavior.
- Does the function exist with the correct signature?
- Does it return the correct types?
- Does it return the correct error types as specified?
- Are all side effects present?
- Are all invariants maintained?
- Verify success criteria: Test each acceptance criterion.
- Write a test for each "Given/When/Then" in the spec if not already present
- Run the tests; each must pass
- If a criterion has no test, flag it as untested
- Verify edge case behavior: Test the edge case table.
- For each row in the spec's Edge Case Behavior table, confirm the implementation produces the specified behavior
- If any edge case is not tested, write a test and run it
- Verify non-functional requirements: Check constraints.
- Performance: run a benchmark if latency/throughput was specified
- Security: verify input validation for all untrusted inputs
- Reliability: check retry and timeout behavior if specified
- Identify deviations: Flag any mismatch between spec and implementation.
- Omission: spec item not implemented
- Addition: behavior not in spec was added
- Deviation: behavior differs from what spec says
- Ambiguity: spec is unclear; implementation made an assumption
- Produce the verification report: Summarize findings for the orchestrator.
Output Format
## Verification Report: <feature name>
### Interface Contracts
| Contract | Status | Notes |
|----------|--------|-------|
| FunctionName signature | ✓ PASS | |
| FunctionName error types | ✓ PASS | |
| SideEffect X | ✗ FAIL | Missing in implementation |
### Success Criteria
| Criterion | Test | Status |
|-----------|------|--------|
| Given X, when Y, then Z | TestFunctionName_Z | ✓ PASS |
### Edge Cases
| Condition | Expected | Actual | Status |
|-----------|----------|--------|--------|
| empty input | return ErrEmpty | returns nil | ✗ FAIL |
### Non-Functional Requirements
| Requirement | Verified By | Status |
|-------------|-------------|--------|
| latency < 100ms | BenchmarkFunctionName | ✓ PASS |
### Deviations
1. **Omission**: <spec item> not implemented. Severity: blocking/non-blocking.
2. **Addition**: <behavior> not in spec. Should be removed or spec updated.
### Verdict
PASS / FAIL: <summary>
### Required Actions Before Merge
1. <action>Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 6
- Maicololiveras/praxisgenai-agent-orchestrator★ 1same name
- orrrrli/ai-engineering-stack★ 1same name
- svg153/skills★ 1same name
- callingcard1973/claude-skills★ 0same name
- monaccode/astromesh-sdd★ 0same name
- pchemguy/Skill-SDD-Manager★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository28 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- code-reviewSkill
- context-disciplineSkill
- find-skillsSkill
- pr-descriptionSkill
- sdd-applySkill
- sdd-designSkill
- sdd-exploreSkill
- sdd-proposeSkill
- sdd-specSkill
- sdd-tasksSkill
- sdd-verifySkill
- squadai-init-playbookSkill
- testingSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- context-disciplineSkill
- find-skillsSkill
- pr-descriptionSkill
- sdd-applySkill
- sdd-designSkill
- sdd-exploreSkill
- sdd-proposeSkill
- sdd-specSkill
- sdd-tasksSkill
- squadai-init-playbookSkill
- testingSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

