agentleFS
PedroMosqueraPedroMosquera/squadai/.agents/skills/sdd-explore/SKILL.md

sdd-explore

Skill10 starsChanged 20 days agoMITView on GitHub

Codebase analysis and context gathering for spec-driven development

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Trace data flow: Follow data through the system.

    line 19

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

SDD Explore Skill

Analyze an existing codebase to gather context before proposing solutions. This is the first phase of the SDD pipeline: understand before proposing.

Steps

  1. Identify entry points: Find where the relevant system behavior begins.
    • Main functions, HTTP handlers, CLI commands, event listeners
    • Public API surfaces (exported functions, interfaces)
    • Configuration loading points
  2. Trace data flow: Follow data through the system.
    • How does input enter the system?
    • What transformations does it undergo?
    • Where is data persisted or returned?
    • What are the side effects?
  3. Map dependencies: Understand what depends on what.
    • Internal package dependencies
    • External library dependencies
    • Interface boundaries and their implementations
    • Circular dependency risks
  4. Identify hotspots: Flag areas of concern.
    • Files changed frequently in git log
    • Code with high complexity or low test coverage
    • Undocumented magic behavior
    • Areas where the feature request will require changes
  5. Document constraints: Note existing commitments.
    • Public API contracts that must not break
    • Performance SLAs or resource limits
    • Security requirements (auth, input validation)
    • Compatibility requirements (old data formats, deprecated paths)
  6. Summarize for the Proposer: Produce a context document.
    • Overview of relevant system components
    • Key data structures and their relationships
    • Constraints the Proposer must respect
    • Open questions that need clarification

Output Format

## Exploration Report: <topic>

### Entry Points
- <file/function>: <description of role>

### Data Flow
<brief description or diagram>

### Key Data Structures
- <type>: <description and purpose>

### Constraints
- <constraint>: <why it exists>

### Hotspots
- <area>: <risk or complexity reason>

### Open Questions
1. <question needing clarification before proposing>

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.