agentleFS
Sign inStart free
ParadevAIParadevAI/Paradev/.agents/skills/redesign/SKILL.md

redesign

Skill16k starsChanged 11 days agoMITView on GitHub

Critique and improve the visual design of an existing UI component with concrete implementation guidance. Use when the user asks to redesign, restyle, reimagine, polish, or improve a component, screen, or interface, especially in React and Tailwind codebases.

12 other projects use a version of this; 1 new project in the last 4 weeks, against 0 the 4 before.

Adopted by

Surging: 1 new project took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data

Week of Sep 13: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 20: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 27: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 4: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 11: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 18: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 25: 0 new projectsWeek of Nov 1: 1 new project
Sep 2026Oct 2026Nov 2026
New projects taking a version of this file each week, over the 8 weeks our latest run read: only 1 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend.

Most recently taken up by

Who's talking about ParadevAI/Paradev

The biggest 5 of 64 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.

See all 64

Talked about on GitHub, the web, Bluesky and YouTube (64 times).

On GitHub · 50

45 more on GitHub

On the web · 11

6 more on the web

Used with

Projects with it also use critique and polish.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • GoogleSkill

    critique

    Expertise in auditing and fixing repository scripts and GitHub Actions workflows to ensure technical robustness and security.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • HK-hubSkill

    polish

    Performs a final quality pass fixing alignment, spacing, consistency, and micro-detail issues before shipping. Use when the user mentions polish, finishing touches, pre-launch review, something looks off, or wants to go from good to great.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 11 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If implementation was requested, make the changes and verify them using the repository's required UI workflow.

    line 16
  2. Distinctive:

    Keep the critique concise and grounded in the current code.

    line 18

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 11 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Redesign

Inspect the real component and its surrounding layout before proposing changes. Reuse the repository's existing design tokens, primitives, and component conventions.

Respond in this order:

  1. Identify the component and file being redesigned.
  2. Name three concrete visual or interaction issues, such as hierarchy, spacing, contrast, alignment, responsiveness, or affordance.
  3. Propose specific layout, token, component, and Tailwind changes for each issue.
  4. Show a short before-and-after excerpt containing only the meaningful class or structure changes.
  5. If implementation was requested, make the changes and verify them using the repository's required UI workflow.

Keep the critique concise and grounded in the current code. Do not invent a new visual language when the repository already provides one.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free